Advertisement

Introduction

  • Ilana Arnon
  • Jim Cottrill
  • Ed Dubinsky
  • Asuman Oktaç
  • Solange Roa Fuentes
  • María Trigueros
  • Kirk Weller
Chapter

Abstract

The acronym APOS stands for Action, Process, Object, and Schema. APOS Theory is a theory of how mathematical concepts can be learned. Rooted in the work of Jean Piaget, its fundamental ideas were first introduced in the early 1980s (Dubinsky 1984), and since that time, extensive development and application have been carried out by researchers, curriculum developers, and teachers in many countries throughout the world.

Keywords

Mathematical Concept Curriculum Development Mathematics Education Research Middle School Teacher Curriculum Developer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnon, I. (1998). In the mind’s eye: How children develop mathematical concepts—Extending Piaget’s theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Haifa University.Google Scholar
  2. Arnon, I., Nesher, P., & Nirenburg, R. (1999). What can be learnt about fractions only with computers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 33–40). Israel: Haifa.Google Scholar
  3. Arnon, I., Nesher, P., & Nirenburg, R. (2001). Where do fractions encounter their equivalents? Can this encounter take place in elementary school? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 247–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubinsky, E. (1984). The cognitive effect of computer experiences on learning abstract mathematical concepts. Korkeakoulujen Atk-Vutiset, 2, 41–47.Google Scholar
  6. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Piaget, J. (1975). Piaget’s theory (G. Cellerier & J. Langer, trans.). In P.B. Neubauer (Ed.), The process of child development (pp. 164–212). New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  8. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness (S. Wedgwood, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1974).Google Scholar
  9. Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2011). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion: Strength and stability of belief. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11, 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilana Arnon
    • 1
  • Jim Cottrill
    • 2
  • Ed Dubinsky
    • 3
  • Asuman Oktaç
    • 4
  • Solange Roa Fuentes
    • 5
  • María Trigueros
    • 6
  • Kirk Weller
    • 7
  1. 1.College of EducationGivat Washington AcademicTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsOhio Dominican UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.School of EducationUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Departamento de Matemática EducativaCinvestav-IPNMexico CityMexico
  5. 5.Escuela de MatemáticasUniversidad Industrial de SantanderBucaramangaColombia
  6. 6.Departamento de MatemáticasInstituto Tecnológico Autónomo de MéxicoSan AngelMexico
  7. 7.Department of MathematicsFerris State UniversityBig RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations