Skip to main content

Customer Needs Based Product Family Sizing Design: The Viper Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design

Abstract

This study explores the issue of optimizing the size of a product family as well as designing the product variants of the family in the context of designing a stand for a unique electric violin known as the “Viper.” The study uses collected customer data in order to identify the optimal number of design variants in the product family, generate design alternatives, assign each design to the appropriate customer type, and verify the outcome. The methodology begins with data collection through a survey of Viper players which is analyzed using K-means clustering analysis and segmentation in order to determine the optimal number of variants in the product family. This analysis also defines each customer group and each group’s specific customer requirements. Quality function deployment (QFD) is used to fit design concepts (generated by the requirements and specifications) to synthesized design variants and assign to a customer group. Then, analytic network process (ANP) is used to substantiate the outcome of the study by further verifying each Product Family Member-Customer Group mapping as well as the number of variants. This is achieved by simultaneously fitting the generated design concepts to customer requirements and customer groups through ANP. The ultimate goal of this work is to provide a simple, easy to understand, easy to reproduce, and customizable method for making product family size and design decisions in any industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhandare S, Allada V (2009) Scalable product family design: case study of axial piston pumps. Int J Prod Res 47:585–620

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell BA, Bicknell KD (1995) The road map to repeatable success—using QFD to implement change. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan L-K, Wu M-L (2002) Quality function deployment: a comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Qual Eng 15(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu M, Gupta S,Okudan GE (2008) A multi-stakeholder quality function deployment approach to support design decision-making. In: Industrial engineering research conference, Vancouver, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus JB, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (2000) Modular product architecture. Des Stud 22(5):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K (2002) Product variety optimization under modular architecture. Comput Aid Des 34:953–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita KF, Sakaguchi H, Akagi S (1999) Product variety deployment and its optimization under modular architecture and modules communalization. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, 12–15 Sept 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JJ, Tzeng GH, Ong CS (2005) Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognit Lett 26:755–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Li L, Schulze L (2008) Genetic algorithm-based optimisation method for product family design with multi-level commonality. J Eng Des 19(5):401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Zhang Y (2005) Product portfolio identification based on association rule mining. Comput Aid Des 37:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Tseng MM, Dufty VG, Lin F (1998) Product family modeling for mass customization. Comput Ind Eng 35(3–4):495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Chen W, Simpson TW (2009) A market-driven approach to product family design. Int J Prod Res 47(1):71–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Feng Y, Tan J, Wei Z (2008) A methodology to support product platform optimization using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Trans Inst Measur Contr 30:295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on math, statistics, and probability, Berkeley, CA, pp 291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade L, Sarkis J (1998) Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process. Logist Transport Rev 34(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP (1997) The power of product platforms. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray S, Turi RH (1999) Determination of the number of clusters in K-means clustering and application in color image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on advances in pattern recognition and digital techniques, India, 2–3 (Sect. 3.2).

  • Saaty TL (2001) Decision making with the ANP and the national missile defense example. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on the AHP, ISAHP 2001, Bern, Switzerland, pp 365–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Salhieh SM (2007) A methodology to redesign heterogeneous product portfolios as homogeneous product families. Comput Aid Des 39:1065–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Super Decisions Software, http://www.superdecisions.com. Viewed on 20 Jul 2012

  • Tseng MM, Jiao J (1996) Design for mass customization. Ann CIRP 45(1):153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CS, Kim HM (2009) Data-driven decision tree classification for product portfolio design optimization. J Comput Inform Sci Eng 9:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff K, Rogers S, Schroedl S (2001) Constrained K-means clustering with background knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on machine learning, pp 577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha XF, Sriram RD (2006) Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach. Knowl Based Syst 19:524–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This product family design project was introduced during the 2010 offering of the Design Decision Making (IE/EDSGN 549) course at Penn State University. Some of the designs included within this chapter are inspired by the designs generated by students enrolled in IE/EDGSN 549. We acknowledge their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gül E. Okudan Kremer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sotos, C., Kremer, G.E.O., Akman, G. (2014). Customer Needs Based Product Family Sizing Design: The Viper Case Study. In: Simpson, T., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z., Hölttä-Otto, K. (eds) Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7936-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7937-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics