Abstract
Product platforms have shown to provide significant cost and time savings while still allowing companies to offer a variety of products. As a result, a multitude of methods have been developed to design product platforms. These methods, however, have been developed independent of one another, and it can be daunting to try to compare the methods and understand which approach might be suitable when or how the methods might interlink, if at all. In this chapter, we review the platform architecting process and tie together several approaches introduced both in this book and the existing literature. A family of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) is used as an illustrative example to demonstrate several of these approaches and their integration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albright RE (2002) Roadmapping for global platform products: product development and management association. Visions Magazine 26(4):19–22
Allan A, Edenfeld D, Joyner WJ, Kahng A, Rodgers M, Zorian Y (2002) 2001 technology roadmap for semiconductors. Computer 35(1):42–53
Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(3):292–306
Chiriac N, Hölttä-Otto K, Suh E, Lysy D (2011) Three approaches to complex system decomposition. In: 13th international dependency and structure modelling conference, DSM’11, Cambridge, MA
Churchill GA, Iacobucci D (2004) Marketing research: methodological foundations, 9th edn. South-Western College Publishing, ISBN: 0324201605
Dahmus JB, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (2001) Modular product architecture. Des Stud 22(5):409–424
Daima TU, Oliverb T (2008) Implementing technology roadmap process in the energy services sector: a case study of a government agency. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(5):687–720
Edenfeld D, Kahng A, Rodgers M, Zorian Y (2004) 2003 technology roadmap for semiconductors. Computer 37(1):47–56
Eppinger S, Whitney D, Smith R, Gebala D (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res Eng Des 6(1):1–13
Ericsson A, Erixon G (1999) Controlling design variants: modular product platforms. ASME Press, New York
Gershenson JK, Prasad JK, Zhang Y (2004) Product modularity: measures and design methods. J Eng Des 15(1):33–51
Guo F, Gershenson JK (2003) Comparison of modular measurement methods based on consistency analysis and sensitivity analysis. In: ASME 2003 design engineering technical conferences, Chicago, IL. ASME, Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48634
Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Market Sci 12(1):1–27
Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73
Helmer R, Yassine A, Meier C (2010) Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix. J Eng Des 21(6):647–675
Hölttä-Otto K, Tang V, Otto K (2008) Analyzing module commonality for platform design using dendrograms. Res Eng Des 19(2):127–141
INCOSE (2010) INCOSE systems engineering handbook v3.2. International Council on Systems Engineering. http://www.incose.org/
Kotler P, Keller KL (2009) Marketing management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Martin M, Ishii K (2000) Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architecture. Res Eng Des 13(4):213–235
Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP (2000) The power of product platforms. The Free Press, New York, NY
Moon SK, Kumara SR, Simpson TW (2006) Data mining and fuzzy clustering to support product family design. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences – design automation conference, Philadelphia, PA. ASME, Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99287
Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering, systematic design, and new product development. Prentice-Hall, New York, NY
Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, New York, NY
Simpson TW (2004) Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(1):3–20
Simpson TW, Siddique Z, Jiao J (2005) Product platform and product family design: methods and applications. Springer, New York, NY
Simpson TW, Marion T, de Weck O, Holtta-Otto K, Shooter SB (2006) Platform-based design and development: current trends and needs in industry. In: ASME 2006 international design engineering technical conferences, Philadelphia, PA. Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99229
Simpson TW, Brennan S, Slingerland LA, Bobuk A, Logan D, Reichard K (2012) From user requirements to commonality specifications: an integrated approach to product family design. Res Eng Des 23(2):141–153
Steward DT (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 28(3):71–74
Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000) A heuristic method for identifying modules in product architectures. Des Stud 21(1):5–31
Suh ES, Furst MR, Mihalyov KJ, de Weck O (2010) Technology infusion for complex systems: a framework and case Study. Syst Eng 13(2):186–203
Thebeau RE (2001) Knowledge management of system interfaces and interactions for product development process. System design & management program. M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2004) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGrw-Hill, New York, NY
Willyard CH, McClees CW (1987) Motorola’s technology roadmap process. Res Manag 30(5):13–19
Yu TL, Yassine A, Goldberg DE (2005) An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms. University of Illinois, Department of General Engineering. Urbana-Champlain: Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory IlliGAL
Yu TL, Yassine AA, Goldberg DE (2007) An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms. Res Eng Des 18(2):91–109
Zamirowski EJ, Otto KN (1999) Identifying product family architecture modularity using function and variety heuristics. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences – 11th international conference on design theory and methodology, Las Vegas, NV. ASME, Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8760
Zhang Y, Jiao J, Ma Y (2007) Market segmentation for product family positioning based on fuzzy clustering. J Eng Des 18(3):227–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hölttä-Otto, K., Otto, K.N., Simpson, T.W. (2014). Defining Modules for Platforms: An Overview of the Architecting Process. In: Simpson, T., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z., Hölttä-Otto, K. (eds) Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7936-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7937-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)