Skip to main content

Defining Modules for Platforms: An Overview of the Architecting Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design

Abstract

Product platforms have shown to provide significant cost and time savings while still allowing companies to offer a variety of products. As a result, a multitude of methods have been developed to design product platforms. These methods, however, have been developed independent of one another, and it can be daunting to try to compare the methods and understand which approach might be suitable when or how the methods might interlink, if at all. In this chapter, we review the platform architecting process and tie together several approaches introduced both in this book and the existing literature. A family of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) is used as an illustrative example to demonstrate several of these approaches and their integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albright RE (2002) Roadmapping for global platform products: product development and management association. Visions Magazine 26(4):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan A, Edenfeld D, Joyner WJ, Kahng A, Rodgers M, Zorian Y (2002) 2001 technology roadmap for semiconductors. Computer 35(1):42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(3):292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiriac N, Hölttä-Otto K, Suh E, Lysy D (2011) Three approaches to complex system decomposition. In: 13th international dependency and structure modelling conference, DSM’11, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA, Iacobucci D (2004) Marketing research: methodological foundations, 9th edn. South-Western College Publishing, ISBN: 0324201605

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmus JB, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (2001) Modular product architecture. Des Stud 22(5):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daima TU, Oliverb T (2008) Implementing technology roadmap process in the energy services sector: a case study of a government agency. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(5):687–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenfeld D, Kahng A, Rodgers M, Zorian Y (2004) 2003 technology roadmap for semiconductors. Computer 37(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger S, Whitney D, Smith R, Gebala D (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res Eng Des 6(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson A, Erixon G (1999) Controlling design variants: modular product platforms. ASME Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson JK, Prasad JK, Zhang Y (2004) Product modularity: measures and design methods. J Eng Des 15(1):33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Gershenson JK (2003) Comparison of modular measurement methods based on consistency analysis and sensitivity analysis. In: ASME 2003 design engineering technical conferences, Chicago, IL. ASME, Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48634

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Market Sci 12(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66(3):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer R, Yassine A, Meier C (2010) Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix. J Eng Des 21(6):647–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä-Otto K, Tang V, Otto K (2008) Analyzing module commonality for platform design using dendrograms. Res Eng Des 19(2):127–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INCOSE (2010) INCOSE systems engineering handbook v3.2. International Council on Systems Engineering. http://www.incose.org/

  • Kotler P, Keller KL (2009) Marketing management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Ishii K (2000) Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architecture. Res Eng Des 13(4):213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP (2000) The power of product platforms. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon SK, Kumara SR, Simpson TW (2006) Data mining and fuzzy clustering to support product family design. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences – design automation conference, Philadelphia, PA. ASME, Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99287

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering, systematic design, and new product development. Prentice-Hall, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW (2004) Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Siddique Z, Jiao J (2005) Product platform and product family design: methods and applications. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Marion T, de Weck O, Holtta-Otto K, Shooter SB (2006) Platform-based design and development: current trends and needs in industry. In: ASME 2006 international design engineering technical conferences, Philadelphia, PA. Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99229

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson TW, Brennan S, Slingerland LA, Bobuk A, Logan D, Reichard K (2012) From user requirements to commonality specifications: an integrated approach to product family design. Res Eng Des 23(2):141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward DT (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 28(3):71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000) A heuristic method for identifying modules in product architectures. Des Stud 21(1):5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh ES, Furst MR, Mihalyov KJ, de Weck O (2010) Technology infusion for complex systems: a framework and case Study. Syst Eng 13(2):186–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Thebeau RE (2001) Knowledge management of system interfaces and interactions for product development process. System design & management program. M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2004) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGrw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Willyard CH, McClees CW (1987) Motorola’s technology roadmap process. Res Manag 30(5):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu TL, Yassine A, Goldberg DE (2005) An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms. University of Illinois, Department of General Engineering. Urbana-Champlain: Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory IlliGAL

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu TL, Yassine AA, Goldberg DE (2007) An information theoretic method for developing modular architectures using genetic algorithms. Res Eng Des 18(2):91–109

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zamirowski EJ, Otto KN (1999) Identifying product family architecture modularity using function and variety heuristics. In: ASME design engineering technical conferences – 11th international conference on design theory and methodology, Las Vegas, NV. ASME, Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8760

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Jiao J, Ma Y (2007) Market segmentation for product family positioning based on fuzzy clustering. J Eng Des 18(3):227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Hölttä-Otto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hölttä-Otto, K., Otto, K.N., Simpson, T.W. (2014). Defining Modules for Platforms: An Overview of the Architecting Process. In: Simpson, T., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z., Hölttä-Otto, K. (eds) Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7936-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7937-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics