Advertisement

Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Algorithmic Approach to Patients

Chapter

Abstract

Identification of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is critical, as the treatment between infected and noninfected arthroplasties is fundamentally different and missing the diagnosis will lead to recurrent failure. Yet in the absence of a true gold standard, the diagnosis of PJI can often be elusive. Although every clinical scenario requires clinical judgment, by maintaining an algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of PJI, the clinician can most effectively use the battery of tests that are available for diagnosis. Relying on a patient’s risk factors, physical exam, and plain radiographs allows a particular patient to be stratified into either a high-probability or a low-probability category for PJI, which will allow better interpretation of subsequent tests and guide how aggressively the diagnosis of PJI is pursued. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) should be obtained in all patients where a revision is planned or if a source for pain is being sought. If positive or if the clinical suspicion for PJI is high, a joint aspiration should be performed and the fluid sent for a synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, differential, and culture. Intraoperative testing can be performed in cases where the diagnosis of PJI has not been confirmed or excluded preoperatively. Given the rising incidence of this problem and the growing infection burden anticipated in coming years, much effort is being put toward improving diagnostic tests for PJI. Emerging technology, such as synovial fluid biomarker analysis, PCR, and sonication, as well as the increasing availability of serum markers, such as IL-6, may improve our ability to identify PJI in the future.

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty Early Postoperative Period Periprosthetic Joint Infection Positive Likelihood Ratio Prosthetic Joint Infection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS); 2010. p. 286.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrack RL, Harris WH. The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75A:66–76.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, Bertot AJ. The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:8–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C, Saxena A, Moric M, Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. The Mark Coventry Award. Diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:34–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS, Osmon DR. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:1247–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernay I, Akinci M, Kitapci M, Tokgozoglu N, Erbengi G. The value of Tc-99m nanocolloid scintigraphy in the evaluation of infected total hip arthroplasties. Ann Nucl Med. 1993;7:215–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bilgen O, Atici T, Durak K, Karaeminogullari O, Bilgen MS. C-reactive protein values and erythrocyte sedimentation rates after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Int Med Res. 2001;29:7–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W, Becker K, Erren M, Gotze C. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89B:94–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:45–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91A:128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Newberg A, Zhuang H, Alavi A. FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1338–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Is closed-suction drain necessary in unicompartmental knee replacement? A prospective randomised study. Knee. 2004;11:399–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B. Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117:121–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabère MP, Lopez FM, Maury P, Taourel P. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology. 2002;224:477–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JW, Dietlein M, Schicha H, Eysel P. The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters III WC, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1355–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG. Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22 Suppl 2:90–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DiCesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF, Liu CJ. Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87A:1921–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:153–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dowsey MM, Choong PF. Obese diabetic patients are at substantial risk for deep infection after primary TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1577–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eisler T, Svensson O, Engström CF, Reinholt FP, Lundberg C, Wejkner B, Schmalholz A, Elmstedt E. Ultrasound for diagnosis of infection in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:1010–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ. The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85B:215–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P, Frommelt L. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90B:874–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Galat DD, McGovern SC, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Hanssen AD, Clarke HD. Surgical treatment of early wound complications following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91A:48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS, Sharkey PF, Keshavarzi N, Aggarwal A, Barrack RL. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90A:1637–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glithero PR, Grigoris P, Harding LK, Hesslewood SR, McMinn DJ. White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75B:371–4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    González DV, Slullitel G, Vestri R, Comba F, Buttaro M, Piccaluga F. No need for routine closed suction drainage in elective arthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized trial in 104 operations. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2004;75:30–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Wilson SD, McAlinden MG, Xu M, Duncan CP. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A:1409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huotari K, Lyytikainen O, Seitsalo S. Patient outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total hip and knee joint replacements. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:219–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jamsen E, Huhtala H, Puolakka T, Moilanen T. Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91A:38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jenny JY, Boeri C, Lafare S. No drainage does not increase complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation: a prospective, comparative, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:299–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johansson T, Engquist M, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Blood loss after total hip replacement: a prospective randomized study between wound compression and drainage. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:967–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP, Parks Jr PF, Homra L, Kaye JJ. Detection of occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using sequential technetium-99m HDP bone scintigraphy and indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:1347–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Joseph TN, Mujtaba M, Chen AL, Maurer SL, Zuckerman JD, Maldjian C, DiCesare PE. Efficacy of combined technetium-99m sulfur colloid/indium-111 leukocyte scans to detect infected total hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:753–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kamme C, Lindberg L. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;154:201–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khan LAK, Cowie JG, Ballantyne JA, Brenkel IJ. The complication rate and medium-term functional outcome after total hip replacement in smokers. Hip Int. 2009;19:47–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS. Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:156–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS. Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;347:188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kraemer WJ, Saplys R, Waddell JP, Morton J. Bone scan, gallium scan, and hip aspiration in the diagnosis of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:611–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:984–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry D, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:52–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Malchau H, Lau E. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89 Suppl 3:144–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lachiewicz PF, Rogers GD, Thomason HC. Aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive culture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78A:749–54.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Larsson S, Thelander U, Friberg S. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after elective orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:237–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Levitsky KA, Hozack WJ, Balderston RA, Rothman RH, Gluckman SJ, Maslack MM, Booth Jr RE. Evaluation of the painful prosthetic joint. Relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate, and joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:237–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, Krauss ES, Tronco GG, Bhargava KK, Nichols KJ, Palestro CJ. Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1864–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lubbeke A, Garavaglia G, Zurcher L, Hoffmeyer P. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;15:327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Magnuson JE, Brown ML, Hauser MF, Berquist TH, Fitzgerald Jr RH, Klee GG. In-111-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy in suspected orthopedic prosthesis infection: comparison with other imaging modalities. Radiology. 1988;168:235–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Malinzak RA, Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Olberding EM, Davis KE. Morbidly obese, diabetic, younger, and unilateral joint arthroplasty patients have elevated total joint arthroplasty infection rates. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):84–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Malhotra R, Morgan DA. Role of core biopsy in diagnosing infection before revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:78–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mulamba L, Ferrant A, Leners N, de NP, Rombouts JJ, Vincent A. Indium-111 leucocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:695–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mulcahy DM, Fenelon GC, McInerney DP. Aspiration arthrography of the hip joint. Its uses and limitations in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:64–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Murdoch DR, Roberts SA, Fowler Jr JV, Shah MA, Taylor SL, Morris AJ, Corey GR. Infection of orthopedic prostheses after Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:647–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Murray RP, Bourne MH, Fitzgerald Jr RH. Metachronous infections in patients who have had more than one total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73A:1469–74.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, Tateda K, Yamashita T. Diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90B:140–4.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA. Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:567–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after THA in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24 Suppl 1:105–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S. Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:317–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Does “excessive” anticoagulation predispose to periprosthetic infection? J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):24–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Patel VP, Walsh M, Sehgal B, Preston C, DeWal H, DiCesare PE. Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89A:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M. The Insall award paper: infection in total knee replacement—a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop. 2001;392:15–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pill SG, Parvizi J, Tang PH, Garino JP, Nelson C, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and (111)indium-white blood cell imaging in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection of the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21 Suppl 2:91–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pring DJ, Henderson RG, Rivett AG, Krausz T, Coombs RR, Lavender JP. Autologous granulocyte scanning of painful prosthetic joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68B:647–52.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pons M, Anglés F, Sánchez C, Matamala A, Cuchi E, Salavert M, Forcada P, Ferrer H. Infected total hip arthroplasty—the value of intraoperative histology. Int Orthop. 1999;23:34–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Potter HG, Foo LF. Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;37:361–73, vi-vii.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1710–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rand JA, Brown ML. The value of indium 111 leukocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful or infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;259:179–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Reing CM, Richin PF, Kenmore PI. Differential bone-scanning in the evaluation of a painful total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61A:933–6.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76A:35–8.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S, Bershadsky B, Kuskowski M, Gioe T, Robinson H, Schmidt R, McElfresh E. Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:506–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Savarino L, Baldini N, Tarabusi C, Pellacani A, Giunti A. Diagnosis of infection after total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;70:139–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Scher DM, Pak K, Lonner JH, Finkel JE, Zuckerman JD, DiCesare PE. The predictive value of indium-111 leukocyte scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee, or resection arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:295–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90A:1869–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Segura AB, Muñoz A, Brulles YR, Hernandez Hermoso JA, Díaz MC, Bajen Lazaro MT, Martín-Comín J. What is the role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses? Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:527–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Smabrekke A, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–2001. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:524–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:672–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sudanese A, Toni A, Busanelli L, Furno A, Montina PP, Marraro MD, Terzi S, Giunti A. Diagnostic protocol in prosthetic loosening. Chir Organi Mov. 1994;79:257–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Teller RE, Christie MJ, Martin W, Nance EP, Haas DW. Sequential indium-labeled leukocyte and bone scans to diagnose prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;373:241–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med. 2004;117:556–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:654–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Hill RM, Brenkel I. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87B:1397–401.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ward DT, Hansen EN, Takemoto SK, Bozic KJ. Cost and effectiveness of postoperative fever diagnostic evaluation in total joint arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:43–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, Merchant N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology. 2000;215:254–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I. The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:582–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wymenga AB, Van Horn JR, Theeuwes A, Muytjens HL, Slooff TJ. Perioperative factors associated with septic arthritis after arthroplasty. Prospective multicenter study of 362 knee and 2,651 hip operations. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63:665–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryLenox Hill HospitalNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations