Modeling Food Process, Quality and Safety: Frameworks and Challenges

Part of the Food Engineering Series book series (FSES)


Physics-based models provide increased understanding and predictive capabilities that can increase efficiency in food product, process, and equipment design; they also improve quality and safety. However, certain key food-specific developments are needed to enable widespread use of simulation technology in the food sector. First and foremost is the need to develop concise modeling frameworks (formulating various food-processing situations in mathematical models) for various classes of processes, as opposed to a custom model for each process, as mostly exists today. Deformable porous media with multiphase transport can provide such a framework, as will be discussed through examples of various processes that have been modeled by many researchers. The next critical piece is to have easy access to the properties that needed to be model. State-of-property prediction, starting from simple correlations and proceeding to multiscale modeling and thermodynamics-based and molecular dynamics, as is being pursued by researchers around the world, will be shared. Prediction beyond process to quality and safety is the third topic, where various approaches to modeling quality in a diffusion-reaction modeling framework will be presented. For safety, a practical approach that groups various food products, and thus provides an avenue to simulate safety for a large number of situations, will be shared. Finally, efforts to integrate modeling components into a novel, user-friendly software for increased use of modeling will be described.


Capillary Pressure Food Process Microwave Heating Food Material Solid Skeleton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This project was partially supported by National Research Initiative Grant 2008-35503-18657 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Competitive Grants program.


  1. Bargmann S, McBride AT, Steinmann P (2011) Models of solvent penetration in glassy polymers with an emphasis on case II diffusion. A comparative review. Appl Mech Rev 64(1). doi:10.1115/1.4003955Google Scholar
  2. Datta AK (2007) Porous media approaches to studying simultaneous heat and mass transfer in food processes. I: problem formulations. J Food Eng 80:80–95Google Scholar
  3. Dhall A, Datta AK (2011) Transport in deformable food materials: a poromechanics approach. Chem Eng Sci 66(24):6482–6497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Datta AK, van der Sman R, Gulati T, Warning A (2012) Soft matter approaches as enablers for food macroscale simulation. Faraday Discuss 158:435–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gulati T, Datta AK (2013) Enabling computer-aided food process engineering: property estimation equations for transport phenomena-based models. J Food Eng 116:483–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halder A, Datta AK (2012) Surface heat and mass transfer coefficients for multiphase porous media transport models with rapid evaporation. Food Bioprod Process 90(c3):475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halder A, Black DG, Davidson PM, Datta AK (2010) Development of associations and kinetic models for microbiological data to be used in comprehensive food safety prediction software. J Food Sci 75(6):R107–R120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halder A, Dhall A, Datta AK, Black DG, Davidson PM, Li J, Zivanovic S (2011a) User-friendly general-purpose predictive software package for food safety. J Food Eng 104:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halder A, Dhall A, Datta AK (2011b) Modeling transport in porous media with phase change: applications to food processing. J Heat Transf Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 133(3):031010-1–031010-13Google Scholar
  10. Ho QT, Carmeliet J, Datta AK, Defraeye T, Delele MA, Herremans E, Opara L, Ramon H, Tijskens E, van der Sman R, Van Liedekerke P, Verboven P, Nicolai BM (2013) Multiscale modeling in food engineering. J Food Eng 114(3):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicolai BM, Datta AK, Defraeye T, Delele MA, Ho QT, Opara L, Ramon H, Tijskens E, van der Sman R, Liedekerke PV, Verboven P (2012) Multiscale modeling in food engineering. J Food Eng (To be submitted)Google Scholar
  12. Pawan ST (2011) Hybrid mixture theory based moisture transport and stress development in corn kernels during drying: coupled fluid transport and stress equations. J Food Eng 105(4):663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rakesh V, Seo Y, Datta AK, McCarthy KL, McCarthy MJ (2010) Heat transfer during microwave combination heating: computational modeling and MRI experiments. Am Inst Chem Eng J 56(9):2468–2478Google Scholar
  14. Thussu S, Datta AK (2012) Texture prediction during deep frying: a mechanistic approach. J Food Eng 108:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van Boekel MAJS (2009) Kinetic modeling of reactions in foods. CRC/Francis & Taylor, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  16. van der Sman RGM (2007a) Soft condensed matter perspective on moisture transport in cooking meat. AIChE J 53(11):2986–2995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van der Sman RGM (2007b) Moisture transport during cooking of meat: an analysis based on Flory-Rehner theory. Meat Sci 76:730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van der Sman RGM (2012) Thermodynamics of meat proteins. Food Hydrocoll 27:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van der Sman RGM, Meinders MBJ (2011) Prediction of the state diagram of starch water mixtures using the Flory–Huggins free volume theory. Soft Matter 7(2):429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations