Advertisement

Ontologies

  • Grega JakusEmail author
  • Veljko Milutinović
  • Sanida Omerović
  • Sašo Tomažič
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Computer Science book series (BRIEFSCOMPUTER)

Abstract

The term “ontology” originates in philosophy, where it refers to the study of being or existence and the organization of reality (Guarino and Giaretta 1995; Studer et al. 1998). The term was introduced into engineering through the field of artificial intelligence where it refers to the representation of the real world in computer programs.

Keywords

Generic Ontology Natural Language Processing Semantic Relation Software Agent Domain Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alani H, Kim S, Millard D, Weal M, Hall W, Lewis P, Shadbolt N (2003) Automatic ontology-based knowledge extraction from web documents. IEEE Intell Syst 18(1):14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barforoush AA, Rahnama A (2012) Ontology learning: revisited. J Web Eng 11(4):269–289Google Scholar
  3. Beale S, Nirenburg S, Mahesh K (1995) Semantic analysis in the Mikrokosmos machine translation project. In: Proceedings of the second symposium on natural language processing (SNLP-95), Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  4. Biebow B, Szulman S, Clément A (1999) TERMINAE: a linguistics-based tool for the building of a domain ontology. In: Knowledge acquisition, modeling and management. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1621. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–66Google Scholar
  5. Blaschke C, Valencia A (2002) Automatic ontology construction from the literature. Genome Inform 13:201–213Google Scholar
  6. Borst WN (1997) Construction of engineering ontologies for knowledge sharing and reuse. Dissertation, Centre for Telematics and Information TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozsak E, Ehrig M, Handschuh S, Hotho A, Maedche A, Motik B, Oberle D, Schmitz C, Staab S, Stojanovic L, Stojanovic N, Studer R, Stumme G, Sure Y, Tane J, Volz R, Zacharias V (2002) KAON—towards a large scale semantic web. In: E-commerce and web technologies. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2455. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–248Google Scholar
  8. Brachman RJ, Schmolze J (1985) An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Sci 9(2):171–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandrasekaran B, Josephson J, Benjamins V (1999) What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell Syst App 14(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen H, Finin T, Joshi A (2003a) An ontology for context aware pervasive computing environments. Knowl Eng Rev 18(3):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen H, Finin T, Joshi A (2003) An intelligent broker for context-aware systems. In: Adjunct proceedings of Ubicomp, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  12. Common Logic Working Group (2012) Common logic working group documents. http://cl.tamu.edu. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  13. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2012) DCMI Home: Dublin core metadata initiative (DCMI). http://dublincore.org/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  14. DogmaModeler (2012) http://www.jarrar.info/Dogmamodeler/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  15. Fensel D, Harmelen F, Horrocks I, McGuinness D, Patel-Schneider P (2001) OIL: an ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortuna B, Grobelnik M, Mladenić D (2007) OntoGen: semi-automatic ontology editor. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on human interface, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  17. Gal A, Modica G, Jamil H (2004) OntoBuilder: fully automatic extraction and consolidation of ontologies from web sources. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on data engineering, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Gangemi A, Guarino N, Masolo C, Oltramari A, Schneider L (2002) Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Knowledge engineering and knowledge management: ontologies and the semantic web. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2473. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 223–233Google Scholar
  19. Genesereth MR, Fikes RE (1992) Knowledge interchange format, version 3.0, reference manual. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomez-Perez A, Corcho O (2002) Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst 17(1):54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of formal ontology in information systems, Trento, June 1998Google Scholar
  23. Guarino N, Giaretta P (1995) Ontologies and knowledge bases, towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars NJI (ed) Towards very large knowledge bases. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  24. Guarino N, Welty C (2002) Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Commun ACM 45(2):61–65Google Scholar
  25. Heflin J, Hendler J, Luke S (1999) SHOE: a knowledge representation language for internet applications. Technical report, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  26. Hozo-Ontology Editor (2012) http://www.hozo.jp/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  27. Jaimes A, Smith JR (2003) Semi-automatic, data-driven construction of multimedia ontologies. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME), Baltimore, 6–9 July 2003Google Scholar
  28. Jarrar M, Meersman R (2002) Formal ontology engineering in the DOGMA approach. In: Meersman R, Tari Z (eds.) On the move to meaningful internet systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBAS. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2519. Springer, Berlin, pp 1238–1254Google Scholar
  29. KAON2 (2012) KAON2—Ontology management for the semantic web. http://kaon2.semanticweb.org/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  30. Karp R, Chaudhri V, Thomere J (1999) XOL: An XML-based ontology exchange language, version 0.4. http://www.ai.sri.com/pkarp/xol/xol.html. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  31. Khoo C, Na J-C (2006) Semantic relations in information science. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 40(1):157–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kietz JU, Maedche A, Volz R (2000) A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In: Proceedings of the EKAW workshop on ontologies and text, Juan-Les-Pins, Oct 2000Google Scholar
  33. Laboratory for Applied Ontology (2012) DOLCE. http://www.loa.istc.cnr.it/DOLCE.html. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  34. Lenat DB, Guha RV (1989) Building large knowledge-based systems: representation and inference in the Cyc project. Addison-Wesley Longman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu W, Weichselbraun A, Scharl A, Chang E (2005) Semi-automatic ontology extension using spreading activation. J Univ Knowl Manag 0(1):50–58Google Scholar
  36. MacGregor R, Bates R (1987) The loom knowledge representation language. Technical report ISI/RS-87-188, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  37. Maedche A, Staab S (2001) Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahesh K (1996) Ontology development for machine translation: ideology and methodology. Technical report, Computer Research Laboratory, New Mexico State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin D, Burstein M, Hobbs J, Lassila O, McDermott D, McIlraith S, Narayanan S, Paolucci M, Parsia B, Payne T, Sirin E, Srinivasan N, Sycara K (2004) OWL-S: semantic markup for web services, W3C member submission. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  40. Mizoguchi R, Sunagawa E, Kozaki K, Kitamura Y (2007) A model of roles within an ontology development tool: Hozo. Appl Ontol 2(2):159–179Google Scholar
  41. Navigli R, Velardi P (2004) Learning domain ontologies from document warehouses and dedicated web sites. Comput Linguist 30(2):151–179zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Navigli R, Velardi P, Gangemi A (2003) Ontology learning and its application to automated terminology translation. IEEE Intell Syst 18(1):22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Noy NF, Sintek M, Decker S, Crubézy M, Fergerson RW (2001) Creating semantic web contents with protege-2000. IEEE Intell Syst 16(2):60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. OntoClean Central (2012) http://www.ontoclean.org/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  45. OpenCyc.org (2012) http://www.opencyc.org/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  46. OWL Working Group (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language document overview. W3C recommendation 27 October 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-overview/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  47. The protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system (2012) http://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  48. Schreiber AT, Dubbeldam B, Wielemaker J, Wielinga B (2001) Ontology-based photo annotation. IEEE Intell Syst 16(3):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schreiber G (2008) Knowledge engineering. In: van Harmelen F, Lifschitz V, Porter B (eds) Handbook of knowledge representation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 929–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semafora systems (2012) OntoStudio. http://www.semafora-systems.com/en/products/ontostudio/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  51. Studer R, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl Eng 25(1–2):161–197zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) (2012) Ontology portal. http://www.ontologyportal.org/. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  53. Sure Y, Studer R (2002) On-to-knowledge methodology. In: Davies J, Fensel D, van Harmelen F (eds) On-to-knowledge: semantic web–enabled knowledge management. Wiley, New York, pp 33–46Google Scholar
  54. TerminaeWiki (2012) http://lipn.univ-paris13.fr/terminae/index.php/Main_Page. Accessed 25 Sep 2012
  55. Weiten M (2009) OntoSTUDIO® as a ontology engineering environment. In: Davies J, Grobelnik M, Mladenic D (eds) Semantic knowledge management: integrating ontology management, knowledge discovery, and human. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grega Jakus
    • 1
    Email author
  • Veljko Milutinović
    • 2
  • Sanida Omerović
    • 1
  • Sašo Tomažič
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.School of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations