Model Uncertainty, State Uncertainty, and State-Space Models

Chapter
Part of the Statistics and Econometrics for Finance book series (SEFF, volume 1)

Abstract

State-space models have been increasingly used to study macroeconomic and financial problems. A state-space representation consists of two equations, a measurement equation which links the observed variables to unobserved state variables and a transition equation describing the dynamics of the state variables. In this chapter, we show that a classic linear-quadratic macroeconomic framework which incorporates two new assumptions can be analytically solved and explicitly mapped to a state-space representation. The two assumptions we consider are the model uncertainty due to concerns for model misspecification (robustness) and the state uncertainty due to limited information constraints (rational inattention). We show that the state-space representation of the observable and unobservable can be used to quantify the key parameters on the degree of model uncertainty. We provide examples on how this framework can be used to study a range of interesting questions in macroeconomics and international economics.

Keywords

Entropy Income Volatility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Luo thanks the Hong Kong GRF under grant No. 748209 and 749510 and HKU seed funding program for basic research for financial support. All errors are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed here are the opinions of the authors only and do not necessarily represent those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System.

References

  1. 1.
    Adam, Klaus (2007), “Optimal monetary policy with imperfect common knowledge,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier 54(2), 267–301.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angeletos, George-Marios and Jennifer La’O (2009), “Noisy Business Cycles,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2009, 319–378.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Backus, David K., Patrick J. Kehoe, and Finn E. Kydland (1992), “International Real Business Cycles,” Journal of Political Economy 101(4), 745–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backus, David K., Bryan R. Routledge, and Stanley E. Zin (2004), “Exotic Preferences forMacroeconomists,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004, 319–414.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohn, Henning (1990), Tax Smoothing with Financial Instruments, American Economic Review 80(5), 1217–1230.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gali, J., Monacelli, T., (2005), “Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy,”  Review of Economic Studies 72(3), 702–734.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barro, Robert J. (1979), “On the Determination of the Public Debt,” Journal of Political Economy 87, 940–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghosh, Atish R. (1995), “Intertemporal Tax-smoothing and the Government Budget Surplus: Canada and the United States,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27, 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, Robert E. (1978), “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Political Economy 86(6), 971–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen, Lars Peter and Thomas J. Sargent (1995), “Discounted Linear Exponential Quadratic Gaussian Control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 40, pp. 968–971.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen, Lars Peter, Thomas J. Sargent, and Thomas D. Tallarini, Jr. (1999), “Robust Permanent Income and Pricing,” Review of Economic Studies 66(4), 873–907.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hansen, Lars Peter and Thomas J. Sargent (2007), Robustness, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen, Lars Peter and Thomas J. Sargent (2007a), Robustness, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen, Lars Peter and Thomas J. Sargent (2007b), “Robust Estimation and Control without Commitment,” Journal of Economic Theory 136(1), 1–27.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen, Lars Peter, Thomas J. Sargent, and Neng Wang (2002), “Robust Permanent Income and Pricing with Filtering,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 6(1), 40–84.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, Chao-Hsi, Lin, Kenneth S. (1993), “Deficits, Government Expenditures and Tax Smoothing in the United States: 1929–1988,” Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacobson, David H. (1973), “Optimal Stochastic Linear Systems with Exponential Performance Criteria and Their Relation to Deterministic Differential Games,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 18, 124–131.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leitemo, Kai, Ulf Soderstrom (2008), “Robust Monetary Policy in the New Keynesian Framework,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 12 (supplement 1), 126–135.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leitemo, Kai, Ulf Soderstrom (2008), “Robust Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32, 3218–3252.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lucas, Robert E., Jr. (1972), “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money,” Journal of Economic Theory 4, 103–24.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luo, Yulei (2008), “Consumption Dynamics under Information Processing Constraints,” Review of Economic Dynamics 11(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luo, Yulei and Eric R. Young (2010), “Risk-sensitive Consumption and Savings under Rational Inattention,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(4), 281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo, Yulei, Jun Nie, and Eric R. Young (2011a), “Robustness, Information-processing Constraints, and the Current Account in Small Open Economies,” forthcoming, Journal of International Economics 88(1), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luo, Yulei, Jun Nie, and Eric R. Young (2011b), “Robust Control, Informational Frictions, and International Consumption Correlations,” Manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo, Yulei, Jun Nie, and Eric R. Young (2011c), “Model Uncertainty and Intertemporal Tax Smoothing,” Manuscript.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morris, Stephen and Hyun Song Shin (2002), “The Social Value of Public Information,” American Economic Review 92, 1521–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muth, John F. (1960), “Optimal Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 55: 299–306.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sims, Christopher A. (2003), “Implications of Rational Inattention,” Journal of Monetary Economics 50(3), 665–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sims, Christopher A. (2006), “Rational Inattention: Beyond the Linear-Quadratic Case,” American Economic Review 96(2), 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Svensson, L.E.O. (2000), “Open-economy inflation targeting,” Journal of International Economics 50(1), 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walsh, Carl E. (2004), “Robust optimal instrument rules and robust control: An equivalent result,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 36(6), 1105–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whittle, Peter (1981), “Risk-Sensitive Linear/Quadratic/Gaussian Control,” Advances in Applied Probability 13, 764–777.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  2. 2.Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations