Skip to main content

Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Reoperative Techniques and Management of Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 2271 Accesses

Abstract

Male stress incontinence is a relatively common and treatable condition which significantly impacts quality of life. For over 40 years, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has remained the gold standard therapy for moderate to large volume male stress urinary incontinence. Patients being considered for AUS placement should undergo a full preoperative history and physical examination with further studies, as clinically indicated. Despite excellent first-time success rates, a percentage of men managed with AUS will experience complications including urinary retention, urethral atrophy, erosion, and device malfunction, among others. Available surgical options for patients with either recurrent incontinence following initial AUS placement or those with prior AUS complications include placement of a tandem cuff, transcorporal cuff, cuff downsizing, reservoir upsizing, or tissue interposition with AUS. Here-in is a review of the available literature, as well as a clinical guide to management of AUS complications, and a visual and descriptive overview of reoperative techniques. In addition to technical advancements with the AUS, ongoing research with salvage therapies will continue to improve outcomes for patients experiencing stress incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AUS:

Artificial urinary sphincter

SIS:

Small intestinal submucosa

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TURP:

Transurethral resection of the prostate

References

  1. Malmsten UG, Milsom I, Molander U, et al. Urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: an epidemiological study of men aged 45 to 99 years. J Urol. 1997;158:1733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown MB, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urol. 1986;136:1022.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yarnell JW, St Leger AS. The prevalence, severity and factors associated with urinary incontinence in a random sample of the elderly. Age Ageing. 1979;8:81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulman C, Claes H, Matthijs J. Urinary incontinence in Belgium: a population-based epidemiological survey. Eur Urol. 1997;32:315.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;55:58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D. Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology. 1999;53:881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol. 2004;171:1212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eden CG, Arora A, Hutton A. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves. J Endourol. 2011;25:815–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Treiyer A, Anheuser P, Butow Z, et al. A single center prospective study: prediction of postoperative general quality of life, potency and continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011;185:1681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, et al. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007;177:1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML, et al. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008;71:90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166:1755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, et al. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol. 2008;179:1912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 2000;164:702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arai Y, Takei M, Nonomura K, et al. Current use of the artificial urinary sphincter and its long-term durability: a nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol. 2009;16:101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai HH, Hsu EI, Boone TB. Urodynamic testing in evaluation of postradical prostatectomy incontinence before artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2009;73:1264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol. 1998;159:1206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolf Jr JS, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. AUA best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179:1379–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Magera Jr JS, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter infection: causative organisms in a contemporary series. J Urol. 2008;180:2475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, et al. Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156:1975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2000;55:2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montague DK. The artificial urinary sphincter (AS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. J Urol. 1992;147:380.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raj GV, Peterson AC, Webster GD. Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175:2186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petero Jr VG, Diokno AC. Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175:605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elliott DS, Barrett DM, Gohma M, et al. Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen the risk of urethral atrophy? Urology. 2001;57:1051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahlon B, Baverstock RJ, Carlson KV. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5:268–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchell ME, et al. Use of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol. 1993;149:283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DiMarco DS, Elliott DS. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170:1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, et al. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002;167:2075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2008;72:825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hudak SJ, Morey AF. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2011;186:1962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahman NU, Minor TX, Deng D, et al. Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2005;95:824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. Elliott MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trost, L., Elliott, D.S. (2014). Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Reoperative Techniques and Management of Complications. In: Brandes, S., Morey, A. (eds) Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7708-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics