Abstract
Male stress incontinence is a relatively common and treatable condition which significantly impacts quality of life. For over 40 years, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has remained the gold standard therapy for moderate to large volume male stress urinary incontinence. Patients being considered for AUS placement should undergo a full preoperative history and physical examination with further studies, as clinically indicated. Despite excellent first-time success rates, a percentage of men managed with AUS will experience complications including urinary retention, urethral atrophy, erosion, and device malfunction, among others. Available surgical options for patients with either recurrent incontinence following initial AUS placement or those with prior AUS complications include placement of a tandem cuff, transcorporal cuff, cuff downsizing, reservoir upsizing, or tissue interposition with AUS. Here-in is a review of the available literature, as well as a clinical guide to management of AUS complications, and a visual and descriptive overview of reoperative techniques. In addition to technical advancements with the AUS, ongoing research with salvage therapies will continue to improve outcomes for patients experiencing stress incontinence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- AUS:
-
Artificial urinary sphincter
- SIS:
-
Small intestinal submucosa
- SUI:
-
Stress urinary incontinence
- TURP:
-
Transurethral resection of the prostate
References
Malmsten UG, Milsom I, Molander U, et al. Urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms: an epidemiological study of men aged 45 to 99 years. J Urol. 1997;158:1733.
Diokno AC, Brock BM, Brown MB, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urol. 1986;136:1022.
Yarnell JW, St Leger AS. The prevalence, severity and factors associated with urinary incontinence in a random sample of the elderly. Age Ageing. 1979;8:81.
Schulman C, Claes H, Matthijs J. Urinary incontinence in Belgium: a population-based epidemiological survey. Eur Urol. 1997;32:315.
Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;55:58.
Gray M, Petroni GR, Theodorescu D. Urinary function after radical prostatectomy: a comparison of the retropubic and perineal approaches. Urology. 1999;53:881.
Lepor H, Kaci L, Xue X. Continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy using self-reporting instruments. J Urol. 2004;171:1212.
Eden CG, Arora A, Hutton A. Cancer control, continence, and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy beyond the learning and discovery curves. J Endourol. 2011;25:815–9.
Treiyer A, Anheuser P, Butow Z, et al. A single center prospective study: prediction of postoperative general quality of life, potency and continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011;185:1681.
Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, et al. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007;177:1021.
O’Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML, et al. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008;71:90.
Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166:1755.
Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S, et al. Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol. 2008;179:1912.
Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 2000;164:702.
Arai Y, Takei M, Nonomura K, et al. Current use of the artificial urinary sphincter and its long-term durability: a nationwide survey in Japan. Int J Urol. 2009;16:101.
Lai HH, Hsu EI, Boone TB. Urodynamic testing in evaluation of postradical prostatectomy incontinence before artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2009;73:1264.
Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol. 1998;159:1206.
Wolf Jr JS, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. AUA best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179:1379–90.
Magera Jr JS, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter infection: causative organisms in a contemporary series. J Urol. 2008;180:2475.
Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, et al. Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156:1975.
Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2000;55:2.
Montague DK. The artificial urinary sphincter (AS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. J Urol. 1992;147:380.
Raj GV, Peterson AC, Webster GD. Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175:2186.
Petero Jr VG, Diokno AC. Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2006;175:605.
Elliott DS, Barrett DM, Gohma M, et al. Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen the risk of urethral atrophy? Urology. 2001;57:1051.
Kahlon B, Baverstock RJ, Carlson KV. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5:268–72.
Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchell ME, et al. Use of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol. 1993;149:283.
DiMarco DS, Elliott DS. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170:1252.
Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, et al. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002;167:2075.
Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2008;72:825.
Hudak SJ, Morey AF. Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2011;186:1962.
Rahman NU, Minor TX, Deng D, et al. Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2005;95:824.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trost, L., Elliott, D.S. (2014). Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Reoperative Techniques and Management of Complications. In: Brandes, S., Morey, A. (eds) Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7708-2_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7707-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7708-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)