Skip to main content

Brownian Simulation of Langevin’s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Applied Mathematical Sciences ((AMS,volume 186))

Abstract

It was argued in Sect. 2.6 that mathematical Brownian motion (MBM) is the overdamped limit of the Langevin displacement process. It is tempting, therefore, to coarse-grain the two-dimensional phase space simulation of the overdamped one-dimensional Langevin equation into the one-dimensional configuration space of an MBM. This simplification, however, comes at a price: it inherits the artifacts of the MBM, such as the infinite rate of level crossing, with fatal consequences. An MBM that crosses a boundary (a point, a curve, or a surface) recrosses it infinitely many times in any time interval. Therefore, the number of recrossings of a boundary increases indefinitely as the step size of the simulation is decreased. Consequently, it becomes impossible to determine when a simulated trajectory is on one side of the boundary or the other. This phenomenon shows up, for example, in the simulation of ions in a given (small) volume in solution: simulated ionic trajectories have to enter and leave the simulation domain an unbounded number of times as the step size of the simulation decreases, leaving no room for determining the convergence of the simulation. Quoting Einstein (1956) in this context, “the movements of one and the same particle after different intervals of time must be considered as mutually independent processes, so long as we think of these intervals of time as being chosen not too small.” This means that the MBM idealization should be taken with a grain of salt; the time step in a simulation cannot be refined beyond a certain limit. This limit has to be determined from the more refined Langevin model of the Brownian movement in the limit of large damping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Allen, M.P. and D.J. Tildesley (1991), Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M.P. and D.J. Tildesley (editors) (1992), Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics, NATO ASI Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 397. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belch, A.C. and M. Berkowitz (1985), “Molecular dynamics simulations of TIPS2 water restricted by a spherical hydrophobic boundary,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 113, 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. and J.A. McCammon (1982), “Molecular dynamics with stochastic boundary conditions,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 90, 215–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R.S., S. Rice, and J. Ross (2000), Physical Chemistry, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C.L., III and M. Karplus (1983), “Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamics,” J. Chem. Phys., 79, 6312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S.G. (1986), The Kind of Motion We Call Heat, I, II, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillol, J.M. (1993), “A new potential for the numerical simulations of electrolyte solutions on a hyper-sphere,” J. Chem. Phys., 99, 8953–8963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillol, J.M. (1995), “A Monte Carlo study of the dielectric constant of the restricted primitive model of electrolytes on the vapor branch of the coexistence line,” J. Chem. Phys., 102, 5471–5479 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillol, J.M., D. Levesque, and J.J. Weiss (1989), “Electrical properties of polarizable ionic solutions II: computer simulation results,” J. Chem. Phys., 91, 5555–5566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S. (1943), “Stochastic Problems In Physics and Astronomy,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 15, 2–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccotti, G. and A. Tenenbaum (1980), “Canonical ensemble and nonequilibrium states by molecular dynamics,” J. Statist. Phys., 23, 767–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry, B., S. Kuyucak and S.H. Chung (1979), “Tests of continuum theories as models of ion channels. II. Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory versus Brownian dynamics,” Biophys. J., 78, 2364–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1956), Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, translated and reprinted by Dover Publications, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, R.S. (1996), “Computing the field in proteins and channels,” J. Membrane Biol., 150, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, R.S., M.M. Kłosek, and Z. Schuss (1995), “Diffusion as a chemical reaction: Stochastic trajectories between fixed concentrations,” J. Chem. Phys., 102 (4), 1767–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.A. and M. Mezei (1995), “The potentials of mean force of sodium chloride and sodium dimethylphosphate in water: An application of adaptive umbrella sampling,” J. Chem. Phys., 102, 419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, T., C. Gorba, and V. Helms (2004), “Interfacing Brownian dynamics simulations,” J. Chem. Phys., 120 (10), 4573–4580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, P., P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec (1990), “50 years after Kramers,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 62, 251–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hille, B. (2001), Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J., W. Kob, K. Binder, and C.A. Angell (1996), “Finite size effects in simulations of glass dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E, 54, 5897–5900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, B., S. Seefeld, and B. Roux (2000), “A grand canonical Monte-Carlo-Brownian dynamics algorithm for simulating ion channel,” Biophysical Journal, 79, 788–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. and H.M. Taylor (1975), A First Course in Stochastic Processes, Academic Press, NY, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G. and A. Warshel (1989), “A surface constraint all atom solvent model for effective simulations of polar solutions,” J. Chem. Phys., 91, 3647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, B. (1995), Density Fluctuations, MSc dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, B., T. Naeh, and Z. Schuss (2002), “The stationary arrival process of diffusing particles from a continuum to an absorbing boundary is Poissonian,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 62 (2), 433–447.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, B., T. Naeh, and Z. Schuss (2003), “Connecting a discrete ionic simulation to a continuum,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (3), 850–873.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, B., Z. Schuss, and A. Singer (2005), “Langevin trajectories between fixed concentrations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 218101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeh, T. (2001), Simulation of Ionic Solution, PhD dissertation, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nymand, T.M. and P. Linse (2000), “Ewald summation and reaction field methods for potentials with atomic charges, dipoles, and polarizabilities,” J. Chem. Phys., 112, 6152–6160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, F.L., J.A. White, and S. Velasco (1997), “Fluctuations in an equilibrium hard-disk fluid: Explicit size effects,” J. Chem. Phys., 107, 4635–4641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, F.L., J.A. White, and S. Velasco (1999), “Fluctuations in the number of particles of the ideal gas: A simple example of explicit finite-size effects,” Amer. J. Phys., 67, 1149–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuss, Z., B. Nadler, and R.S. Eisenberg (2001), “Derivation of PNP equations in bath and channel from a molecular model,” Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2–3), 036116–1–036116–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuss, Z. (2010b), Theory and Applications of Stochastic Processes, and Analytical Approach, Springer series on Applied Mathematical Sciences 170, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamm, Y.Y. and A. Warshel (1998), “The surface constraint all atom model provides size independent results in calculations hydration free energies,” J. Chem. Phys., 109, 7940–7944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. and Z. Schuss (2005), “Brownian simulations and unidirectional flux in diffusion,” Phys. Rev. E, 71, 026115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A., Z. Schuss, B. Nadler, and R.S. Eisenberg (2004), “Memoryless control of boundary concentrations of diffusing particles,” Phys. Rev. E – Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 70 (6) part 1, 061106.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. von Smolan (1906), “Zarys kinetycznej teorji ruchów Browna i roztworów mȩtnych.” Rozprawy Wydziału matematyczno-przyrodniczego Akademii Umiejȩtności w Krakowie, 46A, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleau, J.P. and S.G. Whittington (1977), “A guide to Monte Carlo for statistical mechanics: 1. Highways,” in Statistical Mechanics: Part A: Equilibrium Techniques, Modern Theoretical Chemistry, 5, 15. Plenum Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schuss, Z. (2013). Brownian Simulation of Langevin’s. In: Brownian Dynamics at Boundaries and Interfaces. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 186. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7687-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics