Skip to main content

Post-stroke Aphasia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Behavioral Consequences of Stroke

Abstract

Aphasia is a generic term used to describe a range of impairments in language function following acquired brain damage typically involving the left hemisphere [1–3]. Aphasia may affect all modes of expressive and receptive communication including speaking, understanding, writing, reading, and gesturing [1–3]. This definition seems superficial because it merely describes the surface behavioral deficits of aphasia (e.g., word-finding difficulty and reduced fluency) and mentions nothing about the underlying source of functional impairments. Some scientists prefer to describe aphasia as a multimodal impairment of the integral constituents of language, such as phonology, syntax, morphology, and lexical semantics [4]. Aphasia should not be regarded as a domain-specific language disorder because other cognitive skills (e.g., attention, learning, and memory and executive function) essential for normal processing of language are usually impaired as well. A growing body of evidence indicates that the adequate functioning of these nonlanguage cognitive functions is crucial for the recovery of aphasia and communication deficits [5]. This would imply that formal assessment of aphasia should not be restricted to the language domain; rather it needs to be expanded to include other cognitive and behavioral domains (see later). A new conceptualization of aphasia as a “discrete acquired disorder with a variety of aetiologies but specific characteristics” has been proposed as it provides a more informative viewpoint that may be useful to enhance public awareness of this still under-recognized condition [6]. In this chapter, we present an overview of acute and chronic post-stroke aphasia (PSA) covering epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:163–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:3–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Varley R. Rethinking aphasia therapy: a neuroscience perspective. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:11–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McNeil MR, Pratt SR. Defining aphasia: some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology. 2001;15:901–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lambon Ralph MA, Snell C, Fillingham JK, et al. Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:289–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sherratt S. Written media coverage of aphasia: a review. Aphasiology. 2011;25:1132–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hilari K. The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:211–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Starkstein SE, Robinson RG. Depression and aphasia. Aphaiology. 1988;2:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Starkstein SE, Fedoroff JP, Price TR, et al. Apathy following cerebrovascular lesions. Stroke. 1993;24:1625–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge RE, Starkstein SE, Robinson RG. Apathy following stroke. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55:350–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayo NE, Fellows LK, Scott SC, et al. A longitudinal view of apathy and its impact alter stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:3299–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gialanella B, Prometti P. Rehabilitation length of stay in patients suffering from aphasia alter stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:437–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. www.ninds.nih.gov.

  14. Law J, Rush R, Pringle A-M, et al. The incidence of cases of aphasia following first stroke referred to speech and language therapy services in Scotland. Aphasiology. 2009;23:1266–75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37:1379–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario,Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:196–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:659–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249:413–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:35–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bersano A, Burgio F, Gattinoni M, et al. Aphasia burden to hospitalised acute stroke patients: need for an early rehabilitation program. Int J Stroke. 2009;4:443–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsouli S, Kyritsis AP, Tsagalis G, Virvidaki E, Vemmos KN. Significance of aphasia after first-ever acute stroke: impact on early and late outcomes. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;33:96–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berthier ML, Dávila G, García-Casares N, et al. Atypical conduction aphasia and the right hemisphere: cross-hemispheric plasticity of phonology in a developmentally dyslexic and dysgraphic patient with early left frontal damage. Neurocase. 2011;17:93–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alexander MP. Aphasia: clinical and anatomical aspects. In: Feinberg TE, Farah MJ, editors. Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997. p. 133–49.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hillis AE. Aphasia. Progress in the last quarter of century. Neurology. 2007;69:200–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Evrard S, Woimant F, Le Coz P, Polivka M, Cousin C, Haguenau M. Watershed cerebral infarcts: retrospective study of 24 cases. Neurol Res. 1992;14(2 Suppl):97–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cauquil-Michon C, Flamand-Roze C, Denier C. Borderzone strokes and transcortical aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011;11:570–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Albert ML, Goodglass H, Helm NA, et al. Clinical aspects of dysphasia. In: Arnold GE, Winckel F, Wyke BD, editors. Disorders of human communication 2. Wien New York: Springer; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nadeau SE, Crosson B. Subcortical aphasia. Brain Lang. 1997;58:355–402; discussion 418–23.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crosson B. Subcortical mechanisms in language: lexical-semantic mechanisms and the thalamus. Brain Cogn. 1999;40:414–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Boissezon X, Démonet JF, Puel M, et al. Subcortical aphasia: a longitudinal PET study. Stroke. 2005;36:1467–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marien P, Engelborghs S, Fabbro F, De Deyn PP. The lateralized linguistic cerebellum: a review and a new hypothesis. Brain Lang. 2001;79:580–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ackermann H, Mathiak K, Riecker A. The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: clinical and functional imaging data. Cerebellum. 2007;6:202–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lazar RM, Mohr JP. Revisiting the contribution of Paul Broca to the study of aphasia. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21:236–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Berthier ML. Transcortical aphasias. In: Code C, Humphreys G, editors. Brain damage, behaviour and cognition series. Hove: Psychology Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Commentary KA. Ardila’s attempt to alter aphasiology. Aphasiology. 2010;24:404–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Head H. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. London: Cambridge University Press; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jakobson R. Toward a linguistic typology of aphasic impairments. In: DeReuck AVS, O’Connor M, editors. Disorders of language. Boston: Little Brown; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Luria A. Basic problems of neurolinguistics. New York: Mouton; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ardila A. A proposed reinterpretation and reclassification of aphasic syndromes. Aphasiology. 2010;24:363–94.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Geschwind N. Disconnection syndromes in animals and man. Brain. 1965;88:237–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Damasio H. Neuroanatomical correlates of the aphasias. In: Taylor Sarno M, editor. Acquired aphasia. New York: Academic; 1991. p. 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  43. York III GK. Localization of language function in the twentieth century. J Hist Neurosci. 2009;18:283–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Caramazza A, McCloskey M. The case for single-patient studies. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1988;5:517–28.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Denier C, Masnou P, Mapoure Y, et al. Watershed infarctions are more prone than other cortical infarcts to cause early-onset seizures. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1219–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ross ED. Cerebral localization of functions and the neurology of language: facts versus fiction or is it something else? Neuroscientist. 2010;16:222–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ochfeld E, Newhart M, Molitoris J, et al. Ischemia in broca area is associated with broca aphasia more reliably in acute than in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:325–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lambon Ralph MA. Measuring language recovery in the underlying large-scale neural network: pulling together in the face of adversity. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:570–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Signer S, Cummings JL, Benson DF. Delusions and mood disorders in patients with chronic aphasia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1989;1:40–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Carota A, Rossetti AO, Karapanayiotides T, et al. Catastrophic reaction in acute stroke: a reflex behavior in aphasic patients. Neurology. 2001;57:1902–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Berthier ML, Lambon Ralph MA, Pujol J, et al. Arcuate fasciculus and repetition. The left sometimes can be right. Cortex. 2012;48:133–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shallice T, Warrington EK. Auditory-verbal short-term memory and conduction aphasia. Brain Lang. 1977;4:79–491.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nadeau SE. Phonology: a review and proposals from a connectionist perspective. Brain Lang. 2001;79:511–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ardila A, Rosselli M. Conduction aphasia and verbal apraxia. J Neurolinguistics. 1990;5:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bernal B, Ardila A. The role of the arcate fasciculus in conduction aphasia. Brain. 2009;132:2309–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kohn SE. Conduction aphasia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Buchsbaum BR, Baldo J, Okada K, et al. Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration and phonological short-term memory: an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang. 2011;119:119–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lazar M, Antoniello D. Variability in recovery from aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8:497–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F, Dávila G, et al. Drug therapy of post-stroke aphasia: a review of current evidence. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21:302–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Othmer E, Othmer SC. The clinical interview using DSM-IV. Volume 1: fundamentals. Washington, DC: American Pyschiatric Association; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, et al. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010;41:1485–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. De Haan EH, Gudrun MN, Van Zandvoort MJV. Cognitive function following stroke and vascular cognitive impairment. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:559–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Berthier ML, García-Casares N, Walsh SF, et al. Recovery from post-stroke aphasia: lessons from brain imaging and implications for rehabilitation and biological treatments. Discov Med. 2011;12:275–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F. Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:86–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Nakase-Thompson R, Manning E, Sherer M, et al. Bedside screen of language disturbance among acute care admissions: initial psychometrics of the Mississippi aphasia screening test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;17:848.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Enderby P, Crow E. Frenchay aphasia screening test: validity and comparability. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18:238–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kay J, Lesser R, Colheart M. Psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Seniów J, Litwin M, Leśniak M. The relationship between non-linguistic cognitive deficits and language recovery in patients with aphasia. J Neurol Sci. 2009;15(283):91–4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yeung O, Law SP. Executive functions and aphasia treatment outcomes: data from an ortho-phonological cueing therapy for anomia in Chinese. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12:529–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H, et al. The prognosis for aphasia in stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21(5):350–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kertesz A. Recovery of aphasia. In: Feinberg TE, Farah MJ, editors. Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 1997. p. 167–82.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bakheit AM, Shaw S, Carrington S, et al. The rate and extent of improvement with therapy from the different types of aphasia in the first year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:941–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Staekenborg SS, van der Flier WM, van Straaten EC, et al. Neurological signs in relation to type of cerebrovascular disease in vascular dementia. Stroke. 2008;39:317–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke. 2000;31:223–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Grafman J. Conceptualizing functional neuroplasticity. J Commun Disord. 2000;33:345–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. May A. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the adult human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:475–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Crosson B, Moore AB, Gopinath K, et al. Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005;17:392–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Heiss WD, Thiel A. A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain Lang. 2006;98:118–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sharp DJ, Turkheimer FE, Bose SK, et al. Increased frontoparietal integration after stroke and cognitive recovery. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:753–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Turkeltaub PE, Messing S, Norise C, et al. Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients. Neurology. 2011;76:1726–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Meinzer M, Mohammadi S, Kugel H, et al. Integrity of the hippocampus and surrounding white matter is correlated with language training success in aphasia. Neuroimage. 2010;53:283–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Naeser MA, Palumbo CL, Helm-Estabrooks N, et al. Severe nonfluency in aphasia. Role of the medial subcallosal fasciculus and other white matter pathways in recovery of spontaneous speech. Brain. 1989;112(Pt 1):1–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Marchina S, Zhu LL, Norton A, et al. Impairment of speech production predicted by lesion load of the left arcuate fasciculus. Stroke. 2011;42:2251–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Berthier ML. Transcortical sensory aphasia: dissociation between naming and comprehension. Aphasiology. 1995;9:431–51.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Flamand-Roze C, Cauquil-Michon C, Roze E, et al. Aphasia in border-zone infarcts has a specific initial pattern and good long-term prognosis. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:1397–401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. McClung JS, Rothi LJ, Nadeau SE. Ambient experience in restitutive treatment of aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4:183.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bakheit AM, Shaw S, Barrett L, et al. A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:885–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Cloutman L, Newhart M, Davis C, et al. Acute recovery of oral word production following stroke: patterns of performance as predictors of recovery. Behav Neurol. 2009;21:145–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Crinion J, Price CJ. Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 12):2858–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Crinion JT, Leff AP. Recovery and treatment of aphasia after stroke: functional imaging studies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:667–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Geva S, Correia M, Warburton EA. Diffusion tensor imaging in the study of language and aphasia. Aphasiology. 2011;25:543–58.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Schlaug G, Marchina S, Wan CY. The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to facilitate recovery from post-stroke aphasia. Neuropsychol Rev. 2011;21:288–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Basso CS, Girelli L, et al. Treatment efficacy of language and calculation disorders and speech apraxia: a review of the literature. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47:101–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Laska AC, Kahan T, Hellblom A, et al. Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial on early speech and language therapy in patients with acute stroke and aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:256–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Godecke E, Hird K, Lalor EE, et al. Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(8):635–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Pulvermüller F, Berthier ML. Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology. 2008;22:563–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Meinzer M, Rodriguez AD, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. First decade of research on constrained-induced treatment approaches for aphasia rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1 Suppl):S35–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Basso A, Macis M. Therapy efficacy in chronic aphasia. Behav Neurol. 2011;24:317–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Husain M, Mehta MA. Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:28–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Berthier ML, Green C, Higueras C, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in poststroke aphasia. Neurology. 2006;67:1687–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Berthier ML, Green C, Lara JP, et al. Memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:577–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Holland R, Crinion J. Can tDCS enhance treatment of aphasia after stroke? Aphasiology. 2012;26(9):1169–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang. 2005;93:95–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Treglia E, et al. Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28:511–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Barwood CH, Murdoch BE, Whelan BM, et al. The effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and sham condition rTMS on behavioural language in chronic non-fluent aphasia: short term outcomes. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28:113–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Baker J, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41:1229–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Cherney LR, Erickson RK, Small SL. Epidural cortical stimulation as adjunctive treatment for non-fluent aphasia: preliminary findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1014–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Cherney LR, Harvey RL, Babbitt EM, et al. Epidural cortical stimulation and aphasia therapy. Aphasiology. 2011;iFirst:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, et al. Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke. 2003;34:1944–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Sutcliffe LM, Lincoln NB. The assessment of depression in aphasic stroke patients: the development of the stroke aphasic depression questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:506–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Code C. The quantity of life for people with chronic aphasia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;13:379–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The rivermead mobility index: a further development of the rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:50–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo L. Berthier M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berthier, M.L., Dávila, G., García-Casares, N., Moreno-Torres, I. (2014). Post-stroke Aphasia. In: Schweizer, T., Macdonald, R. (eds) The Behavioral Consequences of Stroke. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7672-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7672-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7671-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7672-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics