Skip to main content

Abstract

In present day public health the term “governance” has become widely used in recent years. However, there are many definitions of governance, samples of which can be found in many documents (cf. Dodgson et al. 2002; Finkelstein 1995; Hufty 2011; Rosenau 1995, 1999; World Bank 1991). In addition, discussions and definitions continue to abound (cf. the Web site of the Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/issue/global-governance/ri23). Whatever definition one wishes to work with the key consideration is that the word “government” is a noun and is an institutional word, of which more later in this chapter. Governance is more of a verbal concept, it is what a government or governmental type entity does. It might be a geopolitical government (nation-state), a corporate government (business entity), a sociopolitical government (tribe, family, etc.), or any number of different kinds of government, but governance is the physical exercise of management power and policy. The term government is also used more abstractly as a synonym for governance, as in the phrase, “Peace, Order and Good Government” found in Section 91 of the 1867 Canadian Constitution Act, as well as in a number of Commonwealth Country documents. In any case most definitions deal with the process by which decisions are made, the exercise of political authority, how institutions collaborate and delegate resources, and, in other words the management of power by institutions. From its beginnings public health has been involved with governance and it remains a key area for public health research and understanding (cf. McQueen et al. 2012a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowen, S., & Zwi, A. B. (2005). Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: A framework for action. PLoS Medicine, 2(7), e166. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brownson, R. C., Chriqui, J. F., & Stamatakis, K. A. (2009). Understanding evidence-based public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1576–1583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, R., Lee, K., & Drager, N. (2002). Global health governance: A conceptual review. London: WHO/London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Discussion Paper No. 1. http://www.bvsde.paho.org/texcom/cd050853/dodgson.pdf

  • Finkelstein, L. (1995). What is global governance? Global Governance, 1, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geronimus, A. T. (2000). Mitigate, resist, or undo: Addressing structural influences on the health of urban populations. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 867–872.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O., Boufford, J. I., & Martinez, R. M. (2004). The future of the public’s health: Vision, values, and L.O. strategies. Health Affairs, 23(4), 96–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O., & Madison, P. (2006). What does social justice require for the public’s health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Affairs, 25(4), 1053–1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. (2009). Tackling health inequalities: The scope for policy. In H. Graham (Ed.), Understanding health inequalities (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44:936–957. Article first published online: December 22, 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufty, M. (2011). Investigating policy processes: The governance analytical framework (GAF). In U. Wiesmann & H. Hurni (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives. Perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern (Vol. 6, pp. 403–424). Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society, 26, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2007). Health governance: The health society. In D. McQueen & I. Kickbusch (Eds.), Health and modernity: The role of theory in health promotion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2010). Health in all policies: The evolution of the concept of horizontal governance. In I. Kickbusch & K. Buckett (Eds.), Implementing health in all policies. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. (1975). Werte—eine urgegebenheit. In H.-G. Gadamer & P. Vogler (Eds.), Neue anthologie (Vol. 7, pp. 343–373). Stuttgart: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, S. (2012). Evidence in the development of health policy. Public Health, 126, 217–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, R., & Oliver, T. R. (2012). Chronic disease and the shifting focus of public health: Is prevention still a political lightweight? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 37, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V., Wismar, M., Lin, V., Jones, C. M., & Davis, M. (Eds.). (2012). Intersectoral governance for health in all policies: Structures, actions and experiences. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, N. Y., & Ruger, J. P. (2011). Global health governance at a crossroads. Global Health Governance, 3(2), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC, National Research Council. (1978). Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC, National Research Council. (2012). Using science as evidence in public policy. Committee on the use of social science knowledge in public policy. In K. Prewitt, T. A. Schwandt, & M. L. Straf (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1, 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1999). Toward an ontology for global governance. In M. Hewson & T. Sinclair (Eds.), Approaches to global governance theory. Albany: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl, T., Wismar, M., Ollila, E., Lahtinen, E., & Leppo, K. (Eds.). (2006). Health in all policies: Prospects and potentials. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA United Nations General Assembly. (2011). Political declaration of high level meeting of the general assembly on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Rep noA/66/L. New York, NY: United Nations General Assembly.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2009). Milestones in health promotion: Statements from global conferences. Geneva: WHO. (cf. http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/Milestones_Health_Promotion_05022010.pdf)

  • WHO. (2011). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (EURO). (2011a). Governance for health in the 21st century: A study conducted for the WHO Regional Office for Europe. EUR/RC61/Inf.Doc./6. Copenhagen: WHO EURO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (EURO). (2011b). How can the health equity impact of universal policies be evaluated? Insights into approaches and next steps: Synthesis of discussions from an Expert Group Meeting. In B. Milton, M. Moonan, D. Taylor-Robinson, & M. Whitehead (Eds.), A joint publication between the WHO European Office for Investment for Health and Development, Venice, Italy and the Liverpool WHO Collaborating Centre for Policy Research on Social Determinants of Health Held at the University of Liverpool, November 2010. Copenhagen: WHO EURO

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOCSDOH. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation. Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1991). Managing development: The governance dimension. A Discussion Paper. No. 34899. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David V. McQueen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McQueen, D.V. (2013). Governance, Policy, and Institutions. In: McQueen, D. (eds) Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7594-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7593-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7594-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics