Skip to main content

How Can We Bridge the Gap? Role of Insurance Mandate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnic Differences in Fertility and Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

There are disparities in the prevalence of infertility, access to care for infertility services and infertility treatment outcomes in minority women compared to Caucasian women. The disparities in access appear to affect African American women and Hispanic women substantially with studies showing that despite a high prevalence of infertility in these groups, they underutilize infertility services. The cost of infertility treatments has been suggested as a cause of its inaccessibility to financially constrained patients who may benefit from it. Despite in vitro fertilization’s widespread use and growing success to treat infertility in the USA, it remains predominantly a privately funded service because many health insurance companies exclude it from coverage. In an effort to address this inequity in care, advocates began lobbying their state legislatures to mandate health insurance coverage since the 1980s. Today, 15 states have state laws mandating some form of coverage for infertility treatment. Despite mandated and comprehensive insurance coverage in a few states, there continues to be a disparity in access to infertility services with individuals accessing these services being Caucasian, highly educated, and wealthy. Further studies are required to understand the effect of current state mandates on access to care for all assisted reproductive technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACOG. ACOG committee opinion. Number 317, October 2005. Racial and ethnic disparities in women’s health. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):889–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinbrook R. Disparities in health care—from politics to policy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1486–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moy E, Dayton E, Clancy CM. Compiling the evidence: the national healthcare disparities reports. Health Affairs. 2005;24(2):376–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abma JC et al. Fertility, family planning, and women’s health: new data from the, 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 1997;23(19):1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feinberg EC et al. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimoto VY et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Purcell K et al. Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):297–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1701–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2(8085):366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CDC. Assisted reproductive technology. Success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta, GA: Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Focus on reproduction. In european society of human reproduction and embryology. Barcelona, Spain, p8–10; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chambers GM et al. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2281–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. In: U.S.C. Bureau, Editor. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. p60–239; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes EG, Giacomini M. Funding in vitro fertilization treatment for persistent subfertility: the pain and the politics. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):431–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zegers-Hochschild F et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain T, Hornstein MD. To pay or not to pay. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):27–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt L. Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. J Health Econ. 2007;26(3):431–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nachtigall RD et al. The challenge of providing infertility services to a low-income immigrant Latino population. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):876–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Becker G et al. Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):882–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feinberg EC et al. Economics may not explain Hispanic underutilization of assisted reproductive technology services. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1439–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barfield WD et al. Racial disparities in outcomes of military and civilian births in California. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(10):1062–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamilton BH, McManus B. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econ. 2012;21(8):994–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(9):661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bitler M, Schmidt L. Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):858–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jain T, Hornstein MD. Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):221–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Thornton M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thornton, K., Fru, K.N., Ibrahim, Y. (2013). How Can We Bridge the Gap? Role of Insurance Mandate. In: Sharara, F. (eds) Ethnic Differences in Fertility and Assisted Reproduction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7547-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7548-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics