Abstract
There are disparities in the prevalence of infertility, access to care for infertility services and infertility treatment outcomes in minority women compared to Caucasian women. The disparities in access appear to affect African American women and Hispanic women substantially with studies showing that despite a high prevalence of infertility in these groups, they underutilize infertility services. The cost of infertility treatments has been suggested as a cause of its inaccessibility to financially constrained patients who may benefit from it. Despite in vitro fertilization’s widespread use and growing success to treat infertility in the USA, it remains predominantly a privately funded service because many health insurance companies exclude it from coverage. In an effort to address this inequity in care, advocates began lobbying their state legislatures to mandate health insurance coverage since the 1980s. Today, 15 states have state laws mandating some form of coverage for infertility treatment. Despite mandated and comprehensive insurance coverage in a few states, there continues to be a disparity in access to infertility services with individuals accessing these services being Caucasian, highly educated, and wealthy. Further studies are required to understand the effect of current state mandates on access to care for all assisted reproductive technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACOG. ACOG committee opinion. Number 317, October 2005. Racial and ethnic disparities in women’s health. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):889–92.
Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666–8.
Steinbrook R. Disparities in health care—from politics to policy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(15):1486–8.
Moy E, Dayton E, Clancy CM. Compiling the evidence: the national healthcare disparities reports. Health Affairs. 2005;24(2):376–87.
Abma JC et al. Fertility, family planning, and women’s health: new data from the, 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat. 1997;23(19):1–114.
Feinberg EC et al. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):888–94.
Fujimoto VY et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):382–90.
Purcell K et al. Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):297–302.
Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1701–10.
Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2(8085):366.
CDC. Assisted reproductive technology. Success rates: National summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta, GA: Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2009.
Focus on reproduction. In european society of human reproduction and embryology. Barcelona, Spain, p8–10; 2008.
Chambers GM et al. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2281–94.
DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. In: U.S.C. Bureau, Editor. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. p60–239; 2010.
Hughes EG, Giacomini M. Funding in vitro fertilization treatment for persistent subfertility: the pain and the politics. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):431–42.
Zegers-Hochschild F et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–7.
Jain T, Hornstein MD. To pay or not to pay. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):27–9.
Schmidt L. Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility. J Health Econ. 2007;26(3):431–46.
Nachtigall RD et al. The challenge of providing infertility services to a low-income immigrant Latino population. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):116–23.
Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):876–81.
Becker G et al. Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):882–7.
Feinberg EC et al. Economics may not explain Hispanic underutilization of assisted reproductive technology services. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1439–41.
Barfield WD et al. Racial disparities in outcomes of military and civilian births in California. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(10):1062–7.
Hamilton BH, McManus B. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. Health Econ. 2012;21(8):994–1016.
Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(9):661–6.
Bitler M, Schmidt L. Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):858–65.
Jain T, Hornstein MD. Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):221–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thornton, K., Fru, K.N., Ibrahim, Y. (2013). How Can We Bridge the Gap? Role of Insurance Mandate. In: Sharara, F. (eds) Ethnic Differences in Fertility and Assisted Reproduction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7547-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7548-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)