Abstract
Most people have definite ideas about the events or circumstances that cause suffering and stress in animals. Many of these ideas are based on personal experiences and, in some cases, on observations of wild and domestic animals. It is tempting to be anthropomorphic in interpreting the experiences of nonhuman animals despite the knowledge that species differ in genetic backgrounds, in perception of their respective environments, and in the experiences that contribute to the development of characteristic phenotypes. This chapter emphasizes that the suffering or stress experienced by an animal in response to any given set of environmental circumstances may be determined directly or indirectly by some combination of factors relating to its evolutionary and ontogenetic or developmental past. That is, the characteristics that an animal inherits from its ancestors and the experiences it acquires during its lifetime may have a profound effect on its ability to adapt to any existing set of environmental circumstances. For example, nobody would deny that terrestrial mammals have inherited fewer adaptations for swimming and surviving in an aquatic environment than mammals living in or near the water, e.g., whales, dolphins, and seals. If an adult human and an adult seal were placed in deep water for the first time, the human would undoubtedly exhibit the fewest adaptations and thus experience the most stress or suffering. Likewise a human that has never been in the water before would exhibit fewer adaptations and experience more stress than one who had previously learned to swim. The message here is that what is stressful for one species or individual is not necessarily stressful to another species or individual. This point may seem rather obvious or trite, but in the literature on animal stress and suffering (particularly the popularized literature) this fact is seldom discussed. For this reason, I emphasize some of the theoretical and practical issues regarding evolutionary and ontogenetic determinants of animal wellbeing and suffering that relate to the subject of animal welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beilharz, R. G. Genetic adaptation in relation to animal welfare. Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob. 3: 117–124, 1982.
Belyaev, D. K., and L. N. Trut. Some genetic and endocrine effects of selection for domestication in silver foxes. In: The Wild Canids, edited by M. W. Fox. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975, p. 416–426.
Boice, R. Burrows of wild and domestic rats: effects of domestication, outdoor raising, age, experience and maternal state. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91: 649–661, 1977.
Boice, R. Captivity and feralization. Psychol. Bull. 89: 407–421, 1981.
Clark, B. R., and E. O. Price. Domestication effects on sexual maturation and fecundity of Norway rats (Battus norvegicus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 63: 215–220, 1981.
Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. The role of the physical rearing environment in the domestication of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Anim. Behay. 25: 298–316, 1977.
Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. Effects of rearing environment on adrenal weights, sexual development and behavior in gerbils: an examination of Richter’s domestication hypothesis. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 94: 857–863, 1980.
Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. Environmental influence on development, behavior and endocrine morphology of gerbils. Physiol. Behay. 27: 761–765, 1981.
Conner, J. L. Genetic mechanisms controlling the domestication of a wild house mouse population (Mus musculus L.). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89: 118–130, 1975.
Craig, J. V., T. P. Craig, and A. D. Dayton. Fearful behavior by caged hens of two genetic stocks. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 10: 263–273, 1983.
Dawkins, M. Towards an objective method of assessing welfare in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2: 245–254, 1976.
Dawkins, M. Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preferences and welfare. Anim. Behay. 25: 1034–1046, 1977.
Dawkins, M. Animal Suffering. The Science of Animal Welfare. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1980.
Dobzhansky, T., and O. Pavlovsky. An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11: 311–319, 1957.
Duncan, I. J. H. Behavioral wisdom lost? Appl. Anim. Ethol. 3: 193–194, 1977.
Duncan, I. J. H. The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 4: 197–200, 1978.
Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London: Oliver and Boyd, 1960.
Fraser, A. F. Behavioral disorders in domestic animals. In: Abnormal Behavior in Animals, edited by M. W. Fox. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1968, p. 179–187.
Galef, B. G., Jr. Aggression and timidity: responses to novelty in feral Norway rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 70: 370–381, 1970.
Grandin, T. The effect of stress on livestock and meat quality prior to and during slaughter. Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob. 1: 313–337, 1980.
Haldane, J. B. S. Suggestions as to the quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3: 51–56, 1949.
Hale, E. B. Domestication and the evolution of behavior. In: The Behaviour of Domestic Animals ( 2nd ed. ), edited by E. S. E. Hafez. London: Baillière, Tindall, and • Cassell, 1969, p. 22–42.
Hediger, H. Wild Animals in Captivity. New York: Dover, 1964.
Huck, U. W., and E. O. Price. Differential effects of environmental enrichment on the open-field behavior of wild and domestic Norway rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho]. 89: 892–898, 1975.
Huck, U. W., and E. O. Price. Effect of the post-weaning environment on the climbing behaviour of wild and domestic Norway rats. Anim. Behay. 24: 364–371, 1976.
Hughes, B. O., and I. J. H. Duncan. Do animals have behavioural needs (Abstract)? Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7: 381–382, 1981.
Hughes, C. W. Early experience in domestication. J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho]. 88: 407–417, 1975.
Keiper, R. R. Environmental and physiological determinants of stereotyped behaviour in birds. In: Proc. World Congr. Ethol. Appl. to Zootechn., 1st, Madrid, 1978, p. 495–497.
King, H. D., and H. H. Donaldson. Life processes and size of the body and organs of the gray Norway rat during ten generations in captivity. Am. Anat. Mem. 14: 1–106, 1929.
Muntzing, A. Darwin’s views on variation under domestication in the light of present-day knowledge. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103: 190–220, 1959.
Nikoletseas, M., and R. K. Lore. Aggression in domesticated rats reared in a burrow-digging environment. Aggressive Behay. 7: 245–252, 1981.
Price, E. O. The laboratory animal and its environment. In: Control of the Animal House Environment, edited by T. McScheehey. London: Lab. Anim., 1976, p. 7–23. (Laboratory Animal Handbook vol. 7.)
Price, E. O. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 59: 1–32, 1984.
Price, E. O., and J. A. King. Domestication and adaptation. In: Adaptation of Domestic Animals, edited by E. S. E. Hafez. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1968, p. 34–45.
Richter, C. Domestication of the Norway rat and its implications for the problems of stress. Proc. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 29: 19–47, 1949.
Scott, J. P., and J. L. Fuller. Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1965.
Sloan, R. J. Relationships Between Behavior and Reproduction in Captive Wild Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus). Syracuse: State Univ. of New York, College Environ. Sci. For., 1973. PhD thesis.
Sumption, L. J. Multiple sire mating in swine: evidence of natural selection for mating efficiency. J. Agric. Sci. 56: 31–37, 1961.
Tschanz, B. Reaktionsnormen und Adaptation. In: Das Tier im Experiment, edited by W. H. Weihe. Bern: Huber, 1978. [Cited in Beilharz (1).]
Van Putten, G. Restriction of induced behaviour (Abstract). Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7: 387–388, 1981.
Wecker, S. The role of early experience in habitat selection by the prairie deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii. Ecol. Monogr. 33: 307–325, 1963.
Willis, M. B. The German Shepherd Dog. Its History, Development and Genetics. New York: Arco, 1977.
Zeuner, F. E. A History of Domesticated Animals. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 American Physiological Society
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Price, E.O. (1985). Evolutionary and Ontogenetic Determinants of Animal Suffering and Well-Being. In: Moberg, G.P. (eds) Animal Stress. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7544-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive