Skip to main content

Evolutionary and Ontogenetic Determinants of Animal Suffering and Well-Being

  • Chapter

Abstract

Most people have definite ideas about the events or circumstances that cause suffering and stress in animals. Many of these ideas are based on personal experiences and, in some cases, on observations of wild and domestic animals. It is tempting to be anthropomorphic in interpreting the experiences of nonhuman animals despite the knowledge that species differ in genetic backgrounds, in perception of their respective environments, and in the experiences that contribute to the development of characteristic phenotypes. This chapter emphasizes that the suffering or stress experienced by an animal in response to any given set of environmental circumstances may be determined directly or indirectly by some combination of factors relating to its evolutionary and ontogenetic or developmental past. That is, the characteristics that an animal inherits from its ancestors and the experiences it acquires during its lifetime may have a profound effect on its ability to adapt to any existing set of environmental circumstances. For example, nobody would deny that terrestrial mammals have inherited fewer adaptations for swimming and surviving in an aquatic environment than mammals living in or near the water, e.g., whales, dolphins, and seals. If an adult human and an adult seal were placed in deep water for the first time, the human would undoubtedly exhibit the fewest adaptations and thus experience the most stress or suffering. Likewise a human that has never been in the water before would exhibit fewer adaptations and experience more stress than one who had previously learned to swim. The message here is that what is stressful for one species or individual is not necessarily stressful to another species or individual. This point may seem rather obvious or trite, but in the literature on animal stress and suffering (particularly the popularized literature) this fact is seldom discussed. For this reason, I emphasize some of the theoretical and practical issues regarding evolutionary and ontogenetic determinants of animal wellbeing and suffering that relate to the subject of animal welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beilharz, R. G. Genetic adaptation in relation to animal welfare. Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob. 3: 117–124, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belyaev, D. K., and L. N. Trut. Some genetic and endocrine effects of selection for domestication in silver foxes. In: The Wild Canids, edited by M. W. Fox. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975, p. 416–426.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boice, R. Burrows of wild and domestic rats: effects of domestication, outdoor raising, age, experience and maternal state. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91: 649–661, 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boice, R. Captivity and feralization. Psychol. Bull. 89: 407–421, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, B. R., and E. O. Price. Domestication effects on sexual maturation and fecundity of Norway rats (Battus norvegicus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 63: 215–220, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. The role of the physical rearing environment in the domestication of the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Anim. Behay. 25: 298–316, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. Effects of rearing environment on adrenal weights, sexual development and behavior in gerbils: an examination of Richter’s domestication hypothesis. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 94: 857–863, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, M. M., and B. G. Galef, Jr. Environmental influence on development, behavior and endocrine morphology of gerbils. Physiol. Behay. 27: 761–765, 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Conner, J. L. Genetic mechanisms controlling the domestication of a wild house mouse population (Mus musculus L.). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89: 118–130, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig, J. V., T. P. Craig, and A. D. Dayton. Fearful behavior by caged hens of two genetic stocks. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 10: 263–273, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawkins, M. Towards an objective method of assessing welfare in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2: 245–254, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawkins, M. Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preferences and welfare. Anim. Behay. 25: 1034–1046, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawkins, M. Animal Suffering. The Science of Animal Welfare. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dobzhansky, T., and O. Pavlovsky. An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11: 311–319, 1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duncan, I. J. H. Behavioral wisdom lost? Appl. Anim. Ethol. 3: 193–194, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duncan, I. J. H. The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 4: 197–200, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London: Oliver and Boyd, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fraser, A. F. Behavioral disorders in domestic animals. In: Abnormal Behavior in Animals, edited by M. W. Fox. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1968, p. 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galef, B. G., Jr. Aggression and timidity: responses to novelty in feral Norway rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 70: 370–381, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grandin, T. The effect of stress on livestock and meat quality prior to and during slaughter. Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob. 1: 313–337, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haldane, J. B. S. Suggestions as to the quantitative measurement of rates of evolution. Evolution 3: 51–56, 1949.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hale, E. B. Domestication and the evolution of behavior. In: The Behaviour of Domestic Animals ( 2nd ed. ), edited by E. S. E. Hafez. London: Baillière, Tindall, and • Cassell, 1969, p. 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hediger, H. Wild Animals in Captivity. New York: Dover, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huck, U. W., and E. O. Price. Differential effects of environmental enrichment on the open-field behavior of wild and domestic Norway rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho]. 89: 892–898, 1975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huck, U. W., and E. O. Price. Effect of the post-weaning environment on the climbing behaviour of wild and domestic Norway rats. Anim. Behay. 24: 364–371, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes, B. O., and I. J. H. Duncan. Do animals have behavioural needs (Abstract)? Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7: 381–382, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hughes, C. W. Early experience in domestication. J. Comp. Physiol. Psycho]. 88: 407–417, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keiper, R. R. Environmental and physiological determinants of stereotyped behaviour in birds. In: Proc. World Congr. Ethol. Appl. to Zootechn., 1st, Madrid, 1978, p. 495–497.

    Google Scholar 

  29. King, H. D., and H. H. Donaldson. Life processes and size of the body and organs of the gray Norway rat during ten generations in captivity. Am. Anat. Mem. 14: 1–106, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muntzing, A. Darwin’s views on variation under domestication in the light of present-day knowledge. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103: 190–220, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nikoletseas, M., and R. K. Lore. Aggression in domesticated rats reared in a burrow-digging environment. Aggressive Behay. 7: 245–252, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Price, E. O. The laboratory animal and its environment. In: Control of the Animal House Environment, edited by T. McScheehey. London: Lab. Anim., 1976, p. 7–23. (Laboratory Animal Handbook vol. 7.)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Price, E. O. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 59: 1–32, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Price, E. O., and J. A. King. Domestication and adaptation. In: Adaptation of Domestic Animals, edited by E. S. E. Hafez. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1968, p. 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richter, C. Domestication of the Norway rat and its implications for the problems of stress. Proc. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 29: 19–47, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scott, J. P., and J. L. Fuller. Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sloan, R. J. Relationships Between Behavior and Reproduction in Captive Wild Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus). Syracuse: State Univ. of New York, College Environ. Sci. For., 1973. PhD thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sumption, L. J. Multiple sire mating in swine: evidence of natural selection for mating efficiency. J. Agric. Sci. 56: 31–37, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tschanz, B. Reaktionsnormen und Adaptation. In: Das Tier im Experiment, edited by W. H. Weihe. Bern: Huber, 1978. [Cited in Beilharz (1).]

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van Putten, G. Restriction of induced behaviour (Abstract). Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7: 387–388, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wecker, S. The role of early experience in habitat selection by the prairie deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii. Ecol. Monogr. 33: 307–325, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Willis, M. B. The German Shepherd Dog. Its History, Development and Genetics. New York: Arco, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zeuner, F. E. A History of Domesticated Animals. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 American Physiological Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Price, E.O. (1985). Evolutionary and Ontogenetic Determinants of Animal Suffering and Well-Being. In: Moberg, G.P. (eds) Animal Stress. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7544-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics