Advertisement

Cardiac Physiology and Clinical Medicine? Two Case Studies

  • Joel D. Howell

Abstract

During the early twentieth century, orthodox American medicine incorporated the ideas and the ideology of the natural sciences, marking the beginning of a relationship that has continued to the present day. Medical schools started to devote ever-increasing hours to science, particularly physiology, and physicians began to perceive their task as the application of clinical science.1 In this chapter I explore the historical justification for physicians’ perception of physiology as a natural science valuable to medicine. In so doing I focus on the question: When, and how, did practicing American physicians come to see the physiology of the heart as clinically useful?

Keywords

Medical Practice Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiac Chamber Coronary Care Unit Left Ventricular Filling Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For a general review, see John Harley Warner, “Physiology,” in The Education of American Physicians, ed. Ronald L. Numbers (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1980). The best work on the history of American medical education is Kenneth Ludmerer, Learning to Heal (New York: Basic, 1985). For a critical evaluation of recent historiography see Daniel M. Fox, “The New Historiography of American Medical Education,” Hist. Educ. Q. 26 (1986): 117–124.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For a representative essay, see Carl J. Wiggers, “The Interrelations of Physiology and Internal Medicine,” J. Am. Med. Assoc. 91 (1928): 270–274. Gerald L. Geison discusses the push for physiology in “Divided We Stand: Physiologists and Clinicians in the American Context,” in The Therapeutic Revolution, ed. Morris J. Vogel and Charles E. Rosenberg ( Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1979 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quoted by Eugene F. DuBois in “Fifty Years of Physiology in America: A Letter to the Editor,” in The Excitement and Fascination of Science (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1965), p. 86. Another noted physiologist, Paul F. Cranefield, was somewhat less certain of physiology’s impact on medicine in “Microscopic Physiology Since 1908, ” Bull. Hist. Med. 33 (1959): 275.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    This ideal has been largely defined by the Annales school. See Fernand Braudel, Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    For a review of recent historical analysis of medical science see Warner, “Science in Medicine,” Osiris 1 (1985): 37–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christopher Lawrence, “Moderns and Ancients: The `New Cardiology’ in Britain 18801930,” Med. Hist. Suppl. 5 (1985): 1–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiggers, “Pathways of Medical Progress,” in Blood, Heart and Circulation, ed. Forest Ray Moulton ( Washington, DC: Science, 1940 ), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanley Joel Reiser, Medicine and the Reign of Technology ( Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joel D. Howell, “Early Use of X-ray Machines and Electrocardiographs at the Pennsylvania Hospital: 1897 Through 1927,” J. Am. Med. Assoc. 255 (1986): 2320–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. B. Cannon, “The Case Method of Teaching Systematic Medicine,” Boston Med. Surg. J. 142 (1900): 31–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas Franklin Williams, “Cabot, Peabody, and the Care of the Patient,” Bull. Hist. Med. 24 (1950): 462–465;PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin Castleman and H. Robert Dudley, Jr., Preface to Clinicopathological Conferences of the Massachusetts General Hospital: Selected Medical Cases (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1936–1960), pp. vii-ix.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Robert Joy has suggested that the use of machines by life insurance examiners and by physicians who certified aviators can be considered as other indicators of perceived usefulness.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    I am not attempting to say anything about the development of cardiology as a specialty (or a subspecialty of internal medicine). There can be little doubt that some relationship exists between clinical cardiology and cardiac physiology. The nature of that relationship, however, awaits further clarification. Also, before the mid-twentieth century, most practicing physicians were general practitioners, not specialists. To define the use of cardiac physiology in terms of specialists’ practice would take us away from the level of ordinary practice and quickly put us into the level of elite, academic researchers.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    George E. Burch and Nicholas P. DePasquale, History of Electrocardiography ( Chicago, IL: Yearbook, 1968 );Google Scholar
  16. John Burnett, “The Origins of the Electrocardiograph as a Clinical Instrument,” Med. Hist. Suppl. 5 (1985): 53–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    For example, C. C. Guthrie, “Twenty Years Progress in Physiology and Pharmacology: Including Present Status and Outlook to the Future,” in Proceedings of the Annual Congress on Medical Education, Medical Licensure, Public Health and Hospitals ( Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 1925 ), pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    Howell, “Early Perceptions of the Electrocardiogram: From Arrhythmia to Infarction,” Bull. Hist. Med. 58 (1984): 83–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 16.
    W. Bruce Fye, “Ventricular Fibrillation and Defibrillation: Historical Perspectives with Emphasis on the Contributions of John MacWilliam, Carl Wiggers, and William Kouwenhoven,” Circulation 71 (1985): 858–865;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kouwenhoven and Orthello R. Langworthy, “Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: An Account of Forty-Five Years of Research,” Johns Hopkins Med. J. 132 (1973): 186–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 17.
    Paul M. Zoll, et al., “Termination of Ventricular Fibrillation in Man by Externally Applied Electric Countershock,” N. Engl. J. Med. 254 (1956): 727–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 18.
    Victor Parsonnet and Marjorie Manhardt, “Permanent Pacing of the Heart: 1952–1976,” Am. J. Cardiol. 39 (1972): 250–256;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peter C. Hanley, et al., “Two Decades of Cardiac Pacing at the Mayo Clinic (1961 Through 1981),” Mayo Clin. Proc. 59 (1984): 268–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 19.
    R. L. Levy, H. G. Bruenn, and D. Kurtz, “Facts on Diseases of the Coronary Arteries Based on a Survey of the Clinical and Pathological Records of 762 Cases,” Am. J. Med. Sci. 187 (1934): 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 20.
    Howell, “Early Use of X-Ray Machines and Electrocardiographs”; and Howell, “Machines and Medicine: Technology Transforms the American Hospital.” In press.Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    For biographical details, see Paul Dudley White, My Life and Medicine ( Boston, MA: Gambit, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    For a general discussion of the history of measuring cardiac pressures and output, see William F. Hamilton and Dickinson W. Richards, “The Output of the Heart,” in Circulation of the Blood: Men and Ideas, ed. Alfred P. Fishman and Richards (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1964), pp. 71–126. Also, Stephen Hales, Statistical Essays: Containing Haemastatistics (1733; Reprint ed., New York: Hafner, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Andre Cournand, “Historical Details of Claude Bernard’s Invention of a Technique for Measuring the Temperature and the Pressure of the Blood Within the Cavities of the Heart,” Trans. NYAcad. Sci.,2d ser., 39 (1980): 1–14.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    Edward Shapiro, “Adolf Fick-Forgotten Genius of Cardiology,” Am. J. Cardiol. 30 (1972): 662–665;PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. T. Doby, “History of Cardiovascular Catheterization,” Clio Med. 12 (1977): 185–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 25.
    Fye, “Ernest Henry Starling, His Law and Its Growing Significance in the Practice of Medicine,” Circulation 68 (1983): 1145–1148;PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mark D. Altschule, “Invalidity of Using So-Called Starling Curves in Clinical Medicine,” Perspect. Biol. Med. 26 (1983): 171187.Google Scholar
  33. 26.
    Wiggers, Reminiscences and Adventures in Circulation Research ( New York: Grune & Stratton, 1958 ).Google Scholar
  34. 27.
    H. J. C. Swan and William Ganz, “Hemodynamic Monitoring: A Personal and Historical Perspective,” Can. Med. Assoc. 121 (1979): 868–871.Google Scholar
  35. 28.
    Eugene D. Robin, “The Cult of the Swan-Ganz Catheter: Overuse and Abuse of Pulmonary Flow Catheters,” Ann. Intern. Med. 103 (1985): 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 29.
    For a discussion of the many advances needed, as well as an excellent chronology that goes far beyond the dates listed in the title, see Julius H. Comroe, Jr. and Robert D. Dripps, The Top Ten Advances in Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Medicine and Surgery 1945–1975 ( Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  37. 30.
    Fye, “Coronary Arteriography—It Took a Long Time,” Circulation 79 (1984): 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 31.
    James Mackenzie, The Study of the Pulse ( Edinburgh: Young J. Pentland, 1902 ).Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    For example, the National Board of Medical Examiners questions in the Physiology Section of part one (the basic sciences) for February, 1922; September, 1922; and almost every exam thereafter. National Board of Medical Examiners Bulletin No. 8: Examination Questions Parts I and II, 1922–1925.Google Scholar
  40. 33.
    For example, George R. Hermann, Synopsis of Diseases of the Heart and Arteries (St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1944 ), p. 68.Google Scholar
  41. 34.
    A. Werner Theodor Otto Forssmann, “Die Sondierung des Rechten Herzens,” Klin. Wochenschr. 8 (1929): 2085–2087, 2287; and Werner Forssmann, Experiments on Myself: Memoirs of a Surgeon in Germany ( New York: St. Martin’s, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  42. 35.
    Cournand and Hilmert Albert Ranges, “Catheterization of the Right Auricle in Man,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 46 (1941): 462–466;Google Scholar
  43. Richards, “The Contributions of Right Heart Catheterization to Physiology and Medicine, with Some Observations on the Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Heart Disease,” Am. Heart J. 54 (1957): 161–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 36.
    Warren describes this event in J. Willis Hurst, “History of Cardiac Catheterization,” in Coronary Arteriography and Angioplasty, ed. Spencer B. King III and John S. Douglas ( New York: McGraw Hill, 1985 ), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  45. 37.
    Fye, “Coronary Arteriography,” 783–784.Google Scholar
  46. 38.
    Louise B. Russell, Technology in Hospitals: Medical Advances and Their Diffusion (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1979), documents that larger hospitals adopted intensive care units, where such measurements were performed, more rapidly than smaller hospitals.Google Scholar
  47. 39.
    Hughes W. Day, “History of Coronary Care Units,” Am. J. Cardiol. 30 (172): 405–407.Google Scholar
  48. 40.
    Russell, Technology in Hospitals,p. 43.Google Scholar
  49. 41.
    Russell C. Maulitz, “Physician versus Bacteriologist: The Ideology of Science in Clinical Medicine,” in Vogel and Rosenberg, Therapeutic Revolution,pp. 91–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Physiological Society 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel D. Howell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations