Skip to main content

The Culture of Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Patient Safety
  • 2411 Accesses

Abstract

The Culture of Safety is a function of the values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and patterns of behavior that influence the context in which care is delivered. It is believed that the culture of the organization has as much an impact on patient safety as the use of best clinical practices.

James Reason’s types of work—skill-based, rules-based, and knowledge-based—offer a useful taxonomy for ways to foster Culture of Safety. An organization can raise the level of skill and provide support for guidelines and protocols to facilitate rules-based work, but knowledge-based work, required when a patient takes a surprising turn or conditions exist of unknown causes, demands critical thinking, a more elusive trait. Staff must rely on their knowledge, the literature, previous experience, and each other, and the culture of the organization exerts an unseen but major influence on what the staff is likely to do under these circumstances. Will they opt for the safety of the patient?

This chapter offers the characteristics of the Culture of Safety and the strategies employed to promote them. Characteristics include patient safety as an organizing principle, leadership engagement, teamwork, transparency, flexibility, and a learning environment. Strategies for prevention of patient harm include designing safe and reliable systems and team-building among others. Examples of strategies to mitigate risk are executive walk-rounds and team huddles. Finally, recovery after an incident includes storytelling and the use of the root cause analysis.

Despite the many barriers to the development of the Culture of Safety, leadership engagement, voluntary initiatives, and regulation have had a positive influence. The Leapfrog Group and several Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) initiatives are voluntary, but have had made their mark. The Joint Commission, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), and several state agencies require leadership attention, transparency, and other evidence-based practices that focus the industry on patient safety. These help to overcome the traditional values including the steep authority gradient and hierarchical structures with physician as the unquestioned leader that must give way to a flat configuration. Acknowledging human fallibility and at the same time expecting accountability is a dilemma that all healthcare leaders must face in the effort to create and sustain the Culture of Safety.

Knowledge and error flow from the same mental sources, only success can tell the one from the other.

Ernst Mach

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system, in committee on quality and healthcare in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sammer C, Lykens K, Singh K, Mains DA, Lackan NA. What is a patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42(2):156–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy D, Blumenthal D. Stories from the sharp end: case studies in safety improvement. Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):165–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walshe K, Shortell SM. When things go wrong: how health care organizations deal with major failures. Health Aff. 2004;23(3):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reason J. Human error. Cambridge, MA: University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sorra JS, Nieva VF. Hospital survey on patient safety culture. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Prepared by Westat under Contract No. 290-96-0004. AHRQ Publication No. 04-0041.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denham CR, Sullenberger CB, Quaid DW, Nance JJ. An NTSB for healthcare: learning from innovation: debate and innovate or capitulate. J Patient Saf. 2012;8(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis GH, Vaithianathan R, Hockey PM, Hirst G, Bagian JP. Counterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety. Milbank Q. 2011;89(1):4–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker DP, Gustafson S, Beaubien J, et al. Medical teamwork and patient safety: the evidence-based relation. [Internet] Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publication No. 05-0053, April 2005. Available from http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/medteam/. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  10. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the unexpected. Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: Wiley; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reason J. Managing the risk of organizational accidents. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marx D. Patient safety and the “Just Culture”: a primer for health care executives. New York, NY: Columbia University; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reliability of military electronic equipment, report by the Advisory Group on Reliability of Electronic Equipment (AGREE). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amalberti R, Hourlier S. Human error reduction strategies in health care. In: Carayon P, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinsky HM, Taichman RS, Sarment DP. Adaptation of airline crew resource management principles to dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(8):1010–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Lashoher A, et al. Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(5):365–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gawande AA. The checklist manifesto: how to get things done right. New York, NY: Picador; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heinrichs WM, Bauman E, Dev P. SBAR “flattens the hierarchy” among caregivers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:175–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quaid D, Thao J, Denham CR. Story power: the secret weapon. J Patient Saf. 2010;6(1):5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. What happened. 2007. The Josie King Foundation. Available from http://www.josieking.org/page.cfm?pageID=10. Last accessed 24 Apr 2012.

  21. Kenney LK, van Pelk RA. To err is human; the need for trauma support is, too. A story of the power of patient/physician partnership after a sentinel event. Patient Safety and Quality Healthcare: Marietta, GA; 2005. Available from http://www.psqh.com/janfeb05/consumers.html. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  22. Conway J. Getting boards on board: engaging governing boards on quality and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):214–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Surveys on patient safety culture. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2012. Available from http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture/index.html. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  24. Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ. Balancing “no blame” with accountability in patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1401–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. The leapfrog group [Internet]. Washington, DC; 2012. Available from http://www.leapfroggroup.org. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  26. Berwick DM, Calkins DR, McCannon CJ, Hackbarth AD. The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA. 2006;295(3):324–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Protecting 5 million lives from harm [Internet]. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012. Available from http://www.ihi.org/offerings/Initiatives/PastStrategicInitiatives/5MillionLivesCampaign/Pages/default.aspx. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  28. Patient safety organization information [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available from http://www.pso.ahrq.gov/psos/overview.htm. Last accessed 28 Oct 2012.

  29. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Neilands TB, Frankel A, Helmreich RL. The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: a randomized trial of clinical units. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5(1):4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberta T. Pedroja Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pedroja, A.T. (2014). The Culture of Safety. In: Agrawal, A. (eds) Patient Safety. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7419-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7419-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7418-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7419-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics