Abstract
The stakes in dependency courts are very high and concern the welfare of highly vulnerable children and the fundamental rights of both children and parents. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of social and behavioral science research that can inform judges, attorneys, and policy makers in their efforts to achieve the goals of child safety, permanency, and well-being while ensuring due process for children and parents. This chapter discusses two earlier chapters of this volume about the work of dependency courts that illustrate the ways through which dependency courts are beginning to use social/behavioral science. Researchers are beginning to assist courts in empirically testing the effectiveness of various consensus developed “best practices” court practices and procedures. Similarly, judges are beginning to question the validity of assessments and the effectiveness of services that they utilize to inform their decisions and mandates regarding the families under their jurisdiction. The chapter discusses challenges and recommendations for courts and social-behavioral scientists working together to build a fair, effective, and efficient dependency. court system with court referred services that have a sound scientific basis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
400,540 children were in foster care on Sept. 30, 2011 (Casanueva et al. 2012).
- 2.
The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (http://www.cebc4cw.org/) and SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-based Services and Practices (http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/) are two resources that readily provide information about the empirical foundation of a broad range of services.
- 3.
42 U.S.C. Section 671(a)(15)(B) The Child Welfare Agency has a duty to provide timely and appropriate services to the family to make it possible for the child to safely return home. The court is required to make findings as to whether the state’s provision of services meets the reasonable efforts standard.
References
Casanueva, C., Smith, K., Dolan, M., Tueller, S., &Lloyd, S. (2012). NSCAW II Wave 2 Report: Safety. OPRE Report #2013-07. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http.://www.acfhhs.gov!sites/defauJt/files/opre/nscaw_child_sa.fety.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.
Everson, M. D., Smith, J. B., Hussey, J. M., English, D., Litrownik, A. J., Dibpwotz, H., et al. (2008). Concordance between adolescent reports of childhood abuse and child protective service determinations in an at-risk sample of young adolescents. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 14–26.
Fowler, P. J., Toro, P. A., & Miles, B. W. (2009). Pathways to and from homelessness and associated psychosocial outcomes among adolescents leaving the foster care system. American Journal of Public Health, 99(8), 1453–1458. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.142547.
Garner, B. R. (2009). Research on the diffusion of evidence-based treatments within substance abuse treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(4), 376–399. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.08.004.
Guggenheim, M. (2005). What’s wrong with children’s rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council). (2012). Child maltreatment research, policy, and practice for the next decade: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Lawrence, C. R., Carlson, E. A., & Egeland, B. (2006). The impact of foster care on development. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 57–76. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060044.
Lederman, C., Gomez-Kaifer, M., Katz, L., Thomlison, B., & Maze, C. (2009). An imperative: Evidence based practice within the child welfare system of care. Juvenile and Family Justice Today, 18(4), 22–25.
Lederman, C., & Osofsky, J. D. (2008). A judicial-mental health partnership to heal young children in juvenile court. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29(1), 36–47. doi:10.1002/imhj.20164.
McGee, R. A., Wolfe, D. A., Yuen, S. A., & Wilson, S. K. (1995). The measurement of maltreatment: A comparison of approaches. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(2), 233–249. doi:10.1016/0145-134(94)00119-F.
Miller, J. C. (2007). 12-Step treatment for alcohol and substance abuse revisited: Best available evidence suggests lack of effectiveness or harm. International Journal of mental Health and Addiction, 6, 568–576. doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9146-4.
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2007). A judges’ guide to using social science. Court Review, (43) 156–163.
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2011). Twenty-five years of Social Science in Law. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 72–82. doi:10.1007s10979-009-9214-8.
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (1995). Resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse & neglect cases.
Sankaran, V. S. (2010). Representing parents in child welfare cases. In D. N. Duquette & A. M. Haralambie (Eds.), Child welfare law and practice: representing children, parents, and state agencies in abuse, neglect, and dependency cases (2nd ed.) Denver: Bradford.
Stockhammer, T. F., Salzinger, S., Feldman, R. S., Mojica, E., & Primavera, L. H. (2001). Assessment of the effect of physical child abuse within an ecological framework: Measurement issues. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(3), 319–344.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2012). https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport19.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2008). Court performance measures in child abuse and neglect cases. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/223567.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weisz, V. (2013). Dependency Courts and Science. In: Wiener, R., Brank, E. (eds) Problem Solving Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7402-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7403-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)