Skip to main content

Dependency Courts and Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem Solving Courts
  • 2236 Accesses

Abstract

The stakes in dependency courts are very high and concern the welfare of highly vulnerable children and the fundamental rights of both children and parents. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of social and behavioral science research that can inform judges, attorneys, and policy makers in their efforts to achieve the goals of child safety, permanency, and well-being while ensuring due process for children and parents. This chapter discusses two earlier chapters of this volume about the work of dependency courts that illustrate the ways through which dependency courts are beginning to use social/behavioral science. Researchers are beginning to assist courts in empirically testing the effectiveness of various consensus developed “best practices” court practices and procedures. Similarly, judges are beginning to question the validity of assessments and the effectiveness of services that they utilize to inform their decisions and mandates regarding the families under their jurisdiction. The chapter discusses challenges and recommendations for courts and social-behavioral scientists working together to build a fair, effective, and efficient dependency. court system with court referred services that have a sound scientific basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    400,540 children were in foster care on Sept. 30, 2011 (Casanueva et al. 2012).

  2. 2.

    The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (http://www.cebc4cw.org/) and SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-based Services and Practices (http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/) are two resources that readily provide information about the empirical foundation of a broad range of services.

  3. 3.

    42 U.S.C. Section 671(a)(15)(B) The Child Welfare Agency has a duty to provide timely and appropriate services to the family to make it possible for the child to safely return home. The court is required to make findings as to whether the state’s provision of services meets the reasonable efforts standard.

References

  • Casanueva, C., Smith, K., Dolan, M., Tueller, S., &Lloyd, S. (2012). NSCAW II Wave 2 Report: Safety. OPRE Report #2013-07. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http.://www.acfhhs.gov!sites/defauJt/files/opre/nscaw_child_sa.fety.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.

  • Everson, M. D., Smith, J. B., Hussey, J. M., English, D., Litrownik, A. J., Dibpwotz, H., et al. (2008). Concordance between adolescent reports of childhood abuse and child protective service determinations in an at-risk sample of young adolescents. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 14–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, P. J., Toro, P. A., & Miles, B. W. (2009). Pathways to and from homelessness and associated psychosocial outcomes among adolescents leaving the foster care system. American Journal of Public Health, 99(8), 1453–1458. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.142547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B. R. (2009). Research on the diffusion of evidence-based treatments within substance abuse treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(4), 376–399. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, M. (2005). What’s wrong with children’s rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council). (2012). Child maltreatment research, policy, and practice for the next decade: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. R., Carlson, E. A., & Egeland, B. (2006). The impact of foster care on development. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 57–76. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, C., Gomez-Kaifer, M., Katz, L., Thomlison, B., & Maze, C. (2009). An imperative: Evidence based practice within the child welfare system of care. Juvenile and Family Justice Today, 18(4), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, C., & Osofsky, J. D. (2008). A judicial-mental health partnership to heal young children in juvenile court. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29(1), 36–47. doi:10.1002/imhj.20164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. A., Wolfe, D. A., Yuen, S. A., & Wilson, S. K. (1995). The measurement of maltreatment: A comparison of approaches. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(2), 233–249. doi:10.1016/0145-134(94)00119-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. C. (2007). 12-Step treatment for alcohol and substance abuse revisited: Best available evidence suggests lack of effectiveness or harm. International Journal of mental Health and Addiction, 6, 568–576. doi:10.1007/s11469-008-9146-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2007). A judges’ guide to using social science. Court Review, (43) 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2011). Twenty-five years of Social Science in Law. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 72–82. doi:10.1007s10979-009-9214-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (1995). Resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse & neglect cases.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran, V. S. (2010). Representing parents in child welfare cases. In D. N. Duquette & A. M. Haralambie (Eds.), Child welfare law and practice: representing children, parents, and state agencies in abuse, neglect, and dependency cases (2nd ed.) Denver: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, T. F., Salzinger, S., Feldman, R. S., Mojica, E., & Primavera, L. H. (2001). Assessment of the effect of physical child abuse within an ecological framework: Measurement issues. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(3), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2012). https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport19.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2008). Court performance measures in child abuse and neglect cases. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/223567.pdf. Retrieved from 24 April 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Weisz Ph.D.M.L.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weisz, V. (2013). Dependency Courts and Science. In: Wiener, R., Brank, E. (eds) Problem Solving Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics