Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Problem Solving Courts pp 1–20Cite as

Social Psychology and Problem-Solving Courts: Judicial Roles and Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

For many who suffer from mental illness or substance abuse, and even for some who are perpetrators of family violence, the criminal justice system has become a dumping ground. After the courts adjudicate these offenders and they serve their punishments, they frequently recidivate and return to the criminal courts with new charges. This chapter describes problem-solving courts as an alternative to the criminal courts that address the revolving door problem. This chapter describes a legal decision-making model that explains how offenders react to problem-solving courts and suggests ways to study both the theory and outcome of drug courts, mental health courts, domestic violence courts, and veteran courts. The model discusses an alternative to the rational actor approach to punishment that problem-solving courts endorse and describes the roles of anticipated emotion, motivation, and perceptions of procedural justice in understanding the reactions of offenders in these courts. This chapter ends with a taxonomy of problem-solving courts, which focuses on the role of the judge as a facilitator versus arbitrator and the type of legal decision-making model that the courts assume (psychological model versus and economic model). The first dimensions examines the different approaches that judges take in criminal and problem-solving courts and the second compares a psychological model of judgment to a utility maximization approach to decision-making theory. This chapter ends with an analysis of the different types of courts that occupy different locations in the four quadrants of the taxonomy and spells out implications for the consumers in these different institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (2007). Status, equity and social identification during an intergroup merger: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 557–577. doi:10.1348/014466606X146015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203. doi:10.1177/1088868307301033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, G., & Feinblatt, J. (2005). Good courts: The case for problem-solving justice. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 303–326. doi:10.1177/0021886306296602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986).Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations: A biannual research series (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L. (2007a). What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 986–994. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L. (2007b). What leads organizational members to collectivize? Injustice and identification as precursors of union certification. Organization Science, 18, 108–126. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: “What feels right is right” and “what feels wrong is wrong.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 498–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 444–463. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00055.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. M., van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. E. R. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1797–1816. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00238.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, S., & Moss, S. A. (2007). The impact of personality and team context on the relationships between workplace injustice and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2549–2575. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forret, M., & Love, M. S. (2008). Employee justice perceptions and coworker relationships. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 248–260. doi:10.1108/01437730810861308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Frey, L., Relyea, C., & Beu, D. (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations, 59, 815–846. doi:10.1177/0018726706067148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000).Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gleibs, I. H., Mummendey, A., & Noack, P. (2008). Predictors of change in postmerger identification during a merger process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1095–1112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S., & Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Ft. Lauderdale, Seattle, Bernadino, and Anchorage. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2008). Procedural justice and identification with virtual teams: The moderating role of face-to-face meetings and geographical dispersion. Social Justice Research, 21, 164–178. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0070-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998).Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2001).Promotion and prevention experiences: Relating emotions to non-emotional motivational states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 186–211). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1203_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515–525. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: Why don’t we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31–37. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. S. (2009). Solution-focused judging bench book. Melbourne: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration and the Legal Services Board of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. S. (2010). Should problem-solving courts be solution-focused courts? Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, Forthcoming; Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010/03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725022. Accessed 20 Sep. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klendauer, R., & Deller, J. (2009). Organizational justice and managerial commitment in corporate mergers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 29–45. doi:10.1108/02683940910922528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (1998). Efficiency and equity: What can be gained by combining Coase and Rawls? Washington Law Review, 73, 329–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (2000). Law and behavioral science: Removing the rationality assumption from law and economics. California Law Review, 88, 1051–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205–218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Greenbaum, R. L., Kuenzi, M., & Shteynberg, G. (2009). When do fair procedures not matter? A test of the identity violation effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 142–161. doi:10.1037/a0013108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910–924. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00455.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 128, 332–345. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., Redlich, A. D., Swanson, J., Clark Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P. S., Appelbaum, M. D., Petrila, J. D., et al. (2005). Use of leverage to improve adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community. Psychiatric Services, 56, 37–44. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.1.37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poythress, N.G., Petrila, J., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. (2002). Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward County Mental Health Court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 517–533. doi:10.1016/S0160-2527(01)00110-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D. (2005). Voluntary, but knowing and intelligent: Comprehension in mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 605–619. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.4.605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., & Petrila, J. (2006). Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 347–362. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9036-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, M., Labriola, M., & Davis, R. C. (2008). Does judicial monitoring deter domestic violence recidivism? Results of a quasi-experimental comparison in the Bronx. Violence Against Women, 14, 185–207. doi:10.1177/1077801207312535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 346–368. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (2001). Psychological study of human judgment: Implications for investment decision making. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2, 160–172. doi:10.1207/S15327760JPFM0203_6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, H. J., Davidson, S., & Brown, C. (2001). Law and psychiatry: Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services, 52, 457–458. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22, 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117–125. doi:10.1080/002075900399411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30, 283–358. doi:0192-3234/2003/0030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41, 553–586. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00314.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, H. W., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Procedural justice and the mental health court’s role in reducing recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 265–271. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R., Bornstein, B., & Voss, A. (2006). Emotion and the law: A framework for inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 231–248. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9025-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. L., Winick, B. J., Georges, L. S., & Castro, A. (2010). A testable theory of problem solving courts: Avoiding past empirical and legal failures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 417–427. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003).Affective forecasting. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–407). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821–836. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B. J. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem solving courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30, 1055–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B. J. (2006). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Enhancing the relationship between law and psychology. Law and Psychology: Current Legal Issues, 9, 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B. J., & Stefan, S. (2005). Forward: A dialogue on mental health courts. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 507–526. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.507.507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winick, B., & Wexler, D. (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USA

    Richard L. Wiener Ph.D., M.L.S. & Leah Georges M.A., M.L.S.

Authors
  1. Richard L. Wiener Ph.D., M.L.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah Georges M.A., M.L.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Wiener Ph.D., M.L.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Burnett Hall 338, Lincoln, 68588-9296, Nebraska, USA

    Richard L. Wiener

  2. , Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Burnett Hall 339, Lincoln, 68588-0308, Nebraska, USA

    Eve M. Brank

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiener, R., Georges, L. (2013). Social Psychology and Problem-Solving Courts: Judicial Roles and Decision Making. In: Wiener, R., Brank, E. (eds) Problem Solving Courts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation