Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond pp 53–72Cite as

Good Governance and the Global Economic Crises: A New Opportunity for UNDP? Comparing WB and UNDP Good Governance Rhetoric

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 3))

Abstract

There is no agreement on what should be contained in the category “Good Governance.” It is essentially a contested term. Both what is “good” and what is “governance” call for long and unresolved academic discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As reported in the Economist (September 8th 2012, even to the biggest development project of South Asia, the Bangladesh bridge over Padma river is stopped due to suspicion of corruption. The WB in this case shows more concern than other donors, particularly those located in the Asian region.

  2. 2.

    From the same newspaper article: “She added that the lack of equality by these institutions is unfair and they should be changed so that they become democratic and transparent and also tell the countries the possible implications of what they are advising poor countries to do. ‘They are all dominated by the central countries and the interests they serve are not for developing countries. The conditions they impose on our countries to give them money affect the sovereignty of the countries and parliaments should keep an eye on what their governments are signing,’ Ms Escuredo said.”

  3. 3.

    In Thailand, the IMF was called “I Am Fired” because of its recommendation to downsize employees as a strategy for economic recovery.

  4. 4.

    According to the experts on UNDP, its focus on social processes rather than design (as I would formulate it) can be seen to be not only politically, but also ethically different from the WB due to the different embeddedness of these organization in democratic versus economic powers: “the egalitarian voting system of the UN and the economically weighted system of the Bretton Woods institutions have created a substantial philosophical gap between these two types of multilateral institutions. The latter have accepted the defense of the principles of the market economy above any other type of principle, including ethical ones” (Clair 2004, op. cit. p. 188).

  5. 5.

    In the newsletter it is typically argued that “In the community of nations, governance is considered “good” and “democratic” (my emphasis) to the degree in which a country’s institutions and processes are transparent. Its institutions refer to such bodies as parliament and its various ministries.  Its processes include such key activities as elections and legal procedures, which must be seen to be free of corruption and accountable to the people. A country’s success in achieving this standard has become a key measure of its credibility and respect in the world. Good governance promotes equity, participation, pluralism, transparency, accountability and the rule of law, in a manner that is effective, efficient and enduring.  In translating these principles into practice, we see the holding of free, fair and frequent elections, representative legislaturesthat make laws and provide oversight, and an independent judiciary to interpret those laws. The greatest threats to oood governance come from corruption, violence and poverty, all of which undermine transparency, security, participation and fundamental freedoms”.

  6. 6.

    “The Oslo Governance Centre (OGC) works to position UNDP as a champion of democratic governance, both as an end in itself, and as a means to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. This is done through knowledge networking and multi-disciplinary team work, as well as through close partnerships with leading policy and research institutions in different parts of the world” (01 Nov 12). The key areas of work are (op.cit): Conducting systematic analysis and reviews of UNDPs governance work around the globe aimed at learning from experiences in the field; based on the analysis and reviews, contributing to UNDP's programming and policy advisory services at the national, regional and global levels; supporting countries to conduct nationally owned and driven democratic governance assessments that serve to strengthen democratic governance at the country level. Addressing new and emerging areas of democratic governance and building the capacity of UNDP's front-line staff to address these new challenges” (op.cit).

  7. 7.

    “This definition recognizes that power is essentially about relationships—between the state, social groups and individuals, or between the state, market forces and civil society. Unless we as development practitioners understand those relationships and the processes that change them, we will not be as effective in supporting the building of responsive, legitimate and resilient states”. And they go on to argue: “Against this background, the Oslo Governance Centre is developing an approach for political economy analyses specific to the UNDP mandate, in order to support programming and policy processes including the facilitation of multi-stakeholder dialogues based on a rigorous analysis of country contexts and ongoing events”.

References

  • Amadae SM (2003) Rationalizing capitalist democracy. The cold war origins of rational choice liberalism. Chicago University Press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair J (2009) Taking aim at the new international economic order. In: Mirowski P, Plehwe D (eds) The road from Mont Pèlerin: the making of the neoliberal thought colllective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir M (2010) Democratic governance. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand U (2006) The Wolrd wide web of anti-neoliberalism. Emerging forms of post- fordist protest and the impossibility of global keynesianism. In: Plehwe D, Walpen B. (eds) Neoliberal Hegemony. A global critic. Routledge, New York and Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull B, Bøåas Morten, McNeill Desmond (2004) Private sector influence in multilateral system: a changing structure of world governance? Global Governace 10:481–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås M, Mcneill D (2003) Multilateral insitutions. A critical introduction. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås M, Mcneill D (2004) Global institutions and development. Framing the World. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes DH, Veem H, Tranøy BS (2012) Global økonomi, krise og politisk styring. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes DH et al. (2012) Global økonomi, krise og politisk strying. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R (1997) An der Schwelle sum autoritären Jahrhundert. Die Zeit, nr. 47, 14.11.1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmann T (1998) Democracy and dictatorship in interwar Western Europe revisited vol 50. World politics, pp 475–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (2005) Harnessing the state: rebalancing strategies for monitoring and motivation. States and development. In: Lange M, Rueschemeyer D (eds) Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance. Palgrave McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficher K (2009) The influence of neoliberals in chile before, during and after pinochet. In: Mirowski P, Plehwe D (eds) The Road to Mont Pelerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Førde B et al (2010) A guide to UNDP democratic governance practice. UNDP, New York and Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1992) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. In: Granovetter M, Swedberg R(eds) The sociology of economic life. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle MS (2004) Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Gov: Int J Policy, Adm, Inst 17(4):525–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle MS (2007) Good enough governance revisited. Dev Policy Rev 25(5):553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunder C, Randeria S (2010) Gestaltung “Staatlicher” Policy im Schatten der Weltbank. In: Axel AP, Paul T (eds) Leviathan Sonderheft. Boike Rehnbein. VS Verlag, Berlin, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen T, Michelsen G G (2002) Good govenance and public sector reforms: the human rights consequences of structural adjusment programmes. In: HO Sano, Alfredsson G (eds) Human rights and good governance. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden G (1996) The economy of affection revisited: african development management in perspective. Improving natural resource management—the role of formal organisations and informal networks and institutions. In: Marcussen HS, Roskilde R University, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydén G (ed ) (1998) Demokratisering i tredje världen. Studentlitteratur. Lund, Författarna och Studenlitteratur

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, G. R. (2005) “The financialization of the American economy”. Socio -Economic Review, 3; 173 -208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjœr M, Kinnerup K (2002). How does good govenance relate to human rights. In: Sano HO, Alfredsson G (eds) Human right and good governance. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær AM (2004) Governance. UK and Malden, USA Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamsås, H., Eirik Sjåvik og Heidi Lundehaug (2012). Velferdsvekst i krisetider. Latinamerikanske løsninger. (LAG). Oslo, LAG

    Google Scholar 

  • March and Olsen (1995) Democratic Governance. Free Press. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, A (2007) Introduction. In Anthony McGrew and Nana K. Poku (eds.). Globalization, development and Human security. Polity Press. Maldon

    Google Scholar 

  • Melim-McLeod C et al. (2012). Insitutional and context analysis. Guidance notes. Oslo Governace Centre and UNDP Democratic Governance Group, Oslo and Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski P, Plehwe D (2009) The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brian R, Goetz AM, Scholte JA, Williams M (2000) Contesting global governance. Multilateral Economic institutions adn Global social Movements. Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe C (2011) Crisis and Inovation if Liberal Democracy: Can Deliberation Be intistutionalised? Socilogický ústav (Praha), pp 447–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe D (2011) Transnational discourse coalition and monetary policy: Argentina and the limited powers of the “Washington Consensus”. Critical Policy Stud 5(2):127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe D, Walpen B, Neunhöfer G (ed) (2006) Neoliberal hegemony. A global critique. Routledge, New york and Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer D, Stephens EH, Stephens JD (1996) Capitalist development and democracy. Polity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sable CF (2001) Eine stille Revolution demokratischer Gouvernanz: auf dem Weg su einem demorkatischen Experimentalismus. Governance im 21. Jahrhundert. In: B. S. Michalski (ed) OECD, Paris, pp 145–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte JA (2012) Poor people in rich countries: the role of global governance. Glob Soc Policies 12(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarstein, R. (2008). Økonomi på en annen måte. Makt og penger fra europeisk føydalisme til global kapitalisme. abstrakt forlag, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair AL (2004) The role of ideas in the united nations development programme. Global insitutions and development. Framing the World. In: Bøås M, Mcneill D. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • St.Clair AL (2003) Poverty conception in the United Nations development programme and the World Bank: knowledge. Politics, and ethics. Department of Sociology. Faculty of Social Science, University of Bergen, Polit/PhD

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (2011) The crises of democratic capitalism. New Left Review 71:5–29 (Sept Oct 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck W (2012) How to study contemporary capitalism? Arch Europe Sosical 53(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C (1998) Durable Inequality. University of California Press. Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal J, Marcussen M, Larsson T, Veggeland F (2010) Unpacking international organisations. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1991) Managing development: the governance dimension. T. W. Bank. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) Govvernance and development. The World Bank, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002) Annual Report. World Bank. Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006) Global development fiancé – the development potential of surging capital flows”. World Bank. Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) The annual report 2007. World Bank annual reports. Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Tor Halvorsen

Authors
  1. Tor Halvorsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tor Halvorsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Christiesgt. 17, Bergen, 5007, Norway

    Ishtiaq Jamil

  2. , Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Christiesgt. 17, Bergen, 5007, Norway

    Steinar Askvik

  3. , Public Administration, Tribhuvan University, Jamal, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Tek Nath Dhakal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halvorsen, T. (2013). Good Governance and the Global Economic Crises: A New Opportunity for UNDP? Comparing WB and UNDP Good Governance Rhetoric. In: Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T. (eds) In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7372-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation