Skip to main content

Understanding Governance in South Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Public Administration, Governance and Globalization ((PAGG,volume 3))

Abstract

The major purpose of this chapter is to categorize and map patterns of governance in South Asia. The questions that are asked are there similarities in governance patterns in countries of this region? Does a particular pattern is more dominant and influence politics, policies, and inter-organizational relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Afghanistan has recently joined the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and is considered a South Asian nation. In this book, South Asia refers to Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

  2. 2.

    Also known as Chankya was the chief minister to Chandragupta (321-296 B.C.), the founder of the Mauryan Empire in India. He was contemporary to Aristotle. He wrote Arthashastra, a treatise on good rule of the king. According to Modelski (1964, p. 549), “the literal meaning of Arthashastra” is Science of Polity; it has been rendered as the study of politics, wealth and practical expediency, of ways of acquiring and maintaining power.”

  3. 3.

    The Mughal Empire (1526–1757) which preceded the British Raj (1757–1947) in India was a patrimonial-bureaucratic empire in which the king was depicted as divinely aided patriarch where all political and administrative power revolved around the ruler who governed on the basis of traditional authority. It entailed obedience and loyalty to the king (as a person) and not to an impersonal office (Blake 1979, p. 94).

  4. 4.

    The administrative system created during British rule is still in operation in the Indian Subcontinent (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka). Other nations in South Asia such as Nepal and the Maldives almost follow the same administrative pattern.

  5. 5.

    After gaining independence in 1947, the Congress party has dominated Indian national politics except for the brief Janata interlude from 1977 to 1980 (Kochanek 1987, p. 1278) and the period between at the end of the 1990s to 2004.

  6. 6.

    In March 2013, the chief justice in Nepal was sworn in as head of an interim government to hold new election after months of bickering among major political parties.

  7. 7.

    For example, Administrative Reforms Commission in India, the Public Administration Reform Commission in Bangladesh and the Administrative Reform Commission in Nepal. Also in other South Asian countries such as Bhutan, the Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, similar reform efforts have been undertaken (Haque 2003, p. 944).

  8. 8.

    Balochistan a province in the Western part bordering Iran and Afghanistan is the poorest region in Pakistan. The demand for more autonomy has now developed into a separatist movement and an ongoing conflict between the Baloch nationalists and the government of Pakistan.

References

  • Bevir M (2011) Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma. In: Bevir M (ed.) The Sage handbook of governance, Sage, London, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake SP (1979) The patrimonial-bureaucratic empire of the Mughals. J Asian Stud 39(1):77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass P (2010) Introduction. In: Brass P (ed) Routledge handbook of South Asian politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Routledge, New york, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Burki SJ (2010) Pakistan politics and its economy. In: Brass PR (ed) Routledge handbook of South Asian politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Routledge, London, pp 83–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhotray V, Stoker G (2010) Governance theory and practice: a cross-disciplinary approach, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand A (2004) Sound governance in the age of globalization. In Farazmand A (ed.) Sound governance: policy and administrative innovations, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle MS (2007) Good enough governance revisited. Development policy review, 25(5):553–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque S (2001) Recent transition in governance in South Asia: contexts, dimensions, and implications. Int J Publ Adm 24(12):1405–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque S (2003) Reinventing governance for performance in South Asia: impacts on citizenship rights. Int J Publ Adm 26(8, 9):941–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechler H, Zinkernagel GF, Koechlin G, Morris D (2011) Can UNCAC address grand corruption? A political economy analysis of the UN convention against corruption and its implementation in three countries, U4 report 2, October, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Heginbotham SJ (1975) Cultures in conflict: four faces of indian bureaucracy (South Asian Institute). Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. Mcgraw Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain A (2008) Politics of alliances in Pakistan, unpublished PhD thesis submitted to the National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan. http://eprints.hec.gov.pk/2646/1/2469.htm. Accessed 02 Dec 2012

  • Hyden G, Court J, Mease K (2004) Making sense of governance: empirical evidence from sixteen developing governance. Lynnne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahan R, Amundsen I (2012) The parliament of Bangladesh: representation and accountability. CPD-CMI working paper 2, center for policy dialogue, April, p 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain RB (2001) Towards good governance: a half century of India’s administrative development. Int J Publ Adm 24(12):1299–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I (2007) Administrative culture in Bangladesh. A H Development Publishing House, Center for Development Governance, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I (2011) Status of citizen’s charter in urban governments: Bangladesh and Nepal compared. In: Jamil I, Aminuzzaman S, Askvik S, Sk Haque (eds) Understanding governance and public policy in Bangladesh. North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 175–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I, Dhakal TN (2012) Benefits and challenges of E-governance for service delivery in Nepal. In: Singh A (ed) Millennium development goals and community initiatives in the Asia Pacific. Springer, New Delhi forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I, Aminuzzaman S, Askvik S, Haque STM (2011) Introduction. In: Jamil I, Aminuzzaman S, Askvik S, Haque STM (eds) Understanding governance & public policy in Bangladesh. North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær AM (2004) Governance. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek SA (1987) Briefcase politics in India: the congress party and the business elite. Asian Surv 27(12):1278–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek S (1993) Patron-client politics and business in Bangladesh. University Press Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek SA (2000) Governance, patronage politics, and democratic transition in Bangladesh. Asian Surv 40(3):530–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek SA (2010) Corruption and the criminalization of politics in South Asia, in Brass PR (ed.) Routledge handbook of South Asian politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Routledge, London, pp 364–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur D (2012) States making & market building for the global south: the developmental state vs. the regulatory state? Jerusalem papers in regulation & governance, working paper no. 44, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski G (1964) Kautilya: foreign policy and international system in the ancient Hindu world. Am Polit Sci Rev 58(3):549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1968) The “Soft State” in underdeveloped countries. Law Rev (UCLA) 15:1118–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter M (2005) Transforming the administrative state: reform in Hong Kong and the future of the developmental state. Publ Adm Rev 65(3):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnini SN (2006) Civil society and good governance in Bangladesh. Asian J Polit Sci 14(2):189–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre J, Peters BG (2000) Governance politics and the state. St. Martins press, inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman HZ, Robinson M (2006) Governance and state effectiveness in Asia. IDS Bull 37(3):130–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker AE (2006) The political economy of decentralized governance: an assessment of rural local government reforms in Bangladesh. Int J Publ Adm 29:1285–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick A (1998) Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. World Bank Res Obs 13(1):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Daily Star (2012) Politics-business nexus behind corruption: ACC chief. http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=23092. Accessed 7 Nov 2012

  • Turner M, Hulme D (1997) Governance, administration and development: making the state work. Macmillan Press Limited, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartola J, Lumijärvi I, Asaduzaman M (2010) Decentralization and new public management: an analysis of Bangladesh and Nepal. In: Vartola J, Lumijärvi I, Asaduzaman M (eds) Towards good governance in South Asia. University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, pp 177–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss TG (2000) Governance, good governance and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Q 21(5):795–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G (1980) Bureaucracy and the post-colonial state in South Asia: a reply. Dev Change 11:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G (2000) Prisoners and escapees: improving the institutional responsibility square in Bangladesh. Publ Adm Dev 20(3):221–237 (August)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafarullah HM, Haque AS (2001) Public management for good governance: reforms, regimes, and reality in Bangladesh. Int J Publ Adm 24(12):1379–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishtiaq Jamil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T.N. (2013). Understanding Governance in South Asia. In: Jamil, I., Askvik, S., Dhakal, T. (eds) In Search of Better Governance in South Asia and Beyond. Public Administration, Governance and Globalization, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7372-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics