Advertisement

Working with Probability

  • Glenn Ledder
Chapter
Part of the Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics and Technology book series (SUMAT)

Abstract

Chapter 3 was a coherent presentation of material on descriptive statistics and probability distributions, which are viewed as theoretical populations. Chapter 4 follows with seven sections that are grouped into three themes. The first four sections treat inferential statistics, beginning with an introductory section that introduces the central question of whether a test population is the same as or different from a general population. This is followed by a section that presents the Cramer–von Mises test for consistency of a data set with a normal distribution. This test serves as a convenient analytical tool for observing the convergence as n of distributions of means of samples of size n to a normal distribution, regardless of the underlying distribution from which the samples are drawn. Section 4.3 presents the central limit theorem, which is then used in Section 4.4 to address statistical inference. Section 4.5 serves as a brief introduction to maximum likelihood, and the chapter closes with two sections on conditional probability. Many of the problems use real data sets that were introduced in Chapterer 3.

Keywords

Conditional Probability Likelihood Function Success Probability Sequence Rule Bernoulli Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Durbin J, M Knott, and CC Taylor. Components of Cramer-von Mises statistics. J. Royal Stat. Soc., B, 37: 216–237 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hand DJ, F Daly, K McConway, D Lunn, and E Ostrowski. Handbook of Small Data Sets. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labby Z. Weldon’s dice, automated. Chance, 22: 6–13 (2009). Available online at http://galton.uchicago.edu/about/docs/labby09dice.pdf. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masjuan J, JC Alvarez-Cemeño, N Garcia-Barragán, M Diaz-Sánchez, M Espiño, MC Sádaba, P González-Porqué, J Martinez San Millán, LM Villar. Clinically isolated syndromes: a new oligoclonal band test accurately predicts conversion to MS. Neurology, 66: 576–578 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Park Service. The Bean Counters: Mark-Recapture. Available on line at http://www.nps.gov/akso/parkwise/teachers/nature/wear_hoofinit/activities/MarkRecapture.htm.CitedJan2013.
  6. 6.
    Norton PG and EV Dunn.Snoring as a risk factor for disease: an epidemiological survey. British Medical Journal, 291, 630–632 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 5, 157–175 (1900)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shonfeld DJ, PM Rainey, MR Cullen, DR Showalter, and DV Cicchetti. Screening for lead poisoning by fingerstick in suburban pediatric practices. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 149: 447–450 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sprott DA. Statistical Inference in Science Springer (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stephens MA. Tests based on EDF statistics. In Goodness-of-Fit Techniques, eds. RB D’Agostino and MA Stephens. Marcel Dekker (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thode Jr HC. Testing for Normality. Marcel Dekker (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tietjen GL. The analysis and detection of outliers. In Goodness-of-Fit Techniques, eds. RB D’Agostino and MA Stephens. Marcel Dekker (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Ledder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations