Skip to main content

A Psychology-Enabled Solution to Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Finance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Enterprising Psychometrics and Poverty Reduction

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSINNOVAT))

  • 863 Accesses

Abstract

Industrial and Organizational Psychology has developed tools to solve a similar problem: personnel selection. Big companies need to select among a large number of individuals applying for a job. This has to be done with relatively low transaction costs, and there is little information available to separate the good candidates from the bad candidates—a very similar problem to that facing the banks. Psychologists have developed psychometric tools to measure things like personality, motivation, outlook, and intelligence, which are related to subsequent job performance. These tools have been shown to work even better than other methods like interviews and background checks, and are widely used. What if they could be applied to the selection of small businesses to lend to? We review a variety of academic studies that have already used these tools to evaluate entrepreneurs and distinguish entrepreneurs from non-entrepreneurs and good entrepreneurs from bad entrepreneurs. The studies center on three main themes: personality, intelligence, and honesty. The first two relate to the ability to repay a loan, in that they could identify entrepreneurs who are more likely to successfully grow their business and its cash flows. Honesty relates to the willingness to repay a loan, as banks need to worry not just if the entrepreneur has enough money to repay but if they then decide to repay or else take the money and run. These studies provide initial insight into what particular characteristics and abilities could be systematically related to credit risk, and used for future lending to small business owners who would traditionally be rejected by banks due to a lack of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Management Association. (2001). 2001 AMA survey on workplace testing: basic skills, job skills, and psychological measurement. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M., & Mount, M. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardin, H., & Cooke, D. (1993). Validity of an honesty test in predicting theft among convenience store employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D., & Shane, S. (1997). A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 142–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chell, E. (2008). The entrepreneurial personality: a social construction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella, M., Buchholtz, A., Riordan, C., Gatewood, R., & Stokes, G. (2004). The Big Five and venture survival: Is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2008). Returns to capital in microenterprises: evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1329–1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2010). Who are the microenterprise owners? Evidence from Sri Lanka on Tokman versus De Soto. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), International differences in entrepreneurship (pp. 63–87). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Miguel, E., Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2005). Who are Russia’s entrepreneurs? Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 587–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Qian, Y., Roland, G., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). What makes a successful entrepreneur? Evidence from Brazil. Russia: Center for Economic and Financial Research Working Paper 0104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. (1989). 'Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 12(2), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G., Jones, E., & Holland, J. (1993). Personality and vocational interests: the relation of Holland’s size interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 518–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, C. (2008, May). Results from 5th annual rocket-hire online screening and assessment usage survey. Journal of Corporate Recruiting Leadership

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1985). Making vocational choices. A theory on vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T., Higgins, C., Thoresen, C., & Barrick, M. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., Goldhammer, F., Rauch, W., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). On the validity of Raven’s matrices test: does spatial ability contribute to performance? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1998–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. (1995). The entrepreneurial personality myth. Business & Economic Review, 41(30), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. (2007). C2D2: Psychological methods in entrepreneurship research. In J. Baum, M. Frese, & R. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1946). Theory of the general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 36, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iddekinge, C., Roth, P., Raymark, P., & Odle-Dusseau, H. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 499–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinger, B., Khwaja, A.I., del Carpio, C. (2013). A Psychology-Enabled Solution to Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Finance. In: Enterprising Psychometrics and Poverty Reduction. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7227-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics