Advertisement

Openness and Ownership

  • Jeffrey Roy
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 2)

Abstract

Despite the steady expansion of the Internet globally and corresponding promises of e-government to usher in a new era of public sector transparency and heightened accountability, there are widening signs of public distrust. The interplay between evolving societies in the still-nascent mobility era and their democratic systems is at the very least in flux, with contemporary forces for transparency and participation rooted in wider shifts in behavior and values being driven by the spreading of digital infrastructure. Moreover, it is not merely the existence of this infrastructure—but how it is assembled and shared in an environment increasingly characterized by technological contestation between proprietary ownership of information and intellectual property and open-sourced platforms, where secrecy and control are shunned and viewed as exceptions rather than norms.

Keywords

Public Sector Cloud Computing Participatory Democracy Cloud Solution Android Operating System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Accenture. (2009). Web 2.0 and the next generation of public service: Driving high performance through cloud. Accenture.Google Scholar
  2. Birch, J. (2008). Nanaimo’s GOOGLE experience. Municipal World, 118(6), 5–9.Google Scholar
  3. Center for Technology in Government. (2012). The dynamics of opening government data. Albany. http://www.ctg.albany.edu
  4. Collier, D. (2011). Cloud computing 201: Guidelines for successful cloud investments. Washington, DC: CAGW.Google Scholar
  5. CSC. (2011). Ahead in the cloud: The CSC cloud usage index. CSC.Google Scholar
  6. de Jong, A. (2011). Benefits of cloud computing realized by increasing number of companies. Retrieved from Cloud Times: http://cloudtimes.org/2011/08/27/benefits-of-cloud-computing-realized-by-increasing-number-of-companies/
  7. Eaves, D. (2009). MuniForge: Creating municipalities that work like the web. Retrieved online: http://eaves.ca/2009/12/08/muniforge-creating-municipalities-that-work-like-the-web/
  8. Fyfe, T., & Crookall, P. (2010). Social media and public sector policy dilemma. Toronto, ON: IPAC.Google Scholar
  9. Giggey, R. (2011, May 7). The G4: Setting city data free. Canadian Government Executive, 17(8)Google Scholar
  10. Greenwald, G. (2012). Probing Obama's secrecy games. Salon.com.Google Scholar
  11. Kiss, J. (2010). G-cloud would help government save. Retrieved from The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/cloud-computing/g-cloud-would-help-the-government-to-save
  12. Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2008). Moving towards cross-boundary citizen-centred service delivery: Challenges and lessons from Canada and around the world. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  13. Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2009). Service transformation, public-private partnerships & shared accountability? Emerging ideas and new practices in B.C., Canada. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 232–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maier-Rabler, U., & Huber, S. (2011). “Open”: The changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. JeDEM: Journal of Democracy, 3(2), 182–191.Google Scholar
  15. Maio, A. D. (2009). Cloud computing may become the worst enemy of centralization. Retrieved from Gartner Blog: http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/08/05/cloud-computing-may-become-the-worst-enemy-of-centralization/
  16. Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OECD. (2001). The hidden threat to E-government: Avoiding large government IT failures. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. Owens, R. C. (2010). Noises heard: Canada’s recent online copyright consultation process—Teachings and cautions. IPOSGOODE. Retrieved from: http://www.iposgoode.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/RichardOwens_Online_Copyright_Consultation_19April2010.pdf
  19. Public Administration Committee. (2011). Twelfth report—Government and IT: “A Recipe For Rip-Offs”: Time for a new approach. London: Parliament of Great Britain.Google Scholar
  20. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: Transformation for the digital age (Governance Series). Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  21. Roy, J. (2011). Bridging the great divide: Piliticians and the public. Montreal, QC: IRPP.Google Scholar
  22. Roy, J. (2012c). Secrecy versus openness: Democratic adaptation in a Web 2.0 era. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance: Political, policy and management implications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2007). Participatory governance and citizens’ engagement in policy development. New York: Service Delivery and Budgeting.Google Scholar
  24. Wyld, D. (2007). The blogging revolution: Government in the age of Web 2.0. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for The Business of Government.Google Scholar
  25. Wyld, D. C. (2010a). Moving to the cloud: An introduction to cloud computing in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.Google Scholar
  26. Wyld, D. C. (2010b). THE cloudy future of government IT: Cloud computing and the public sector around the world. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 1(1).Google Scholar
  27. Young, N. (2012). The virtual self. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations