Sperm Donation: Psychological Aspects

Chapter

Abstract

Donor insemination (DI) is the oldest form of third-party reproduction. The first successful DI went unreported for 25 years, presumably to protect the individuals involved from embarrassment. Legal opinion, once decidedly against the procedure, has evolved over time, making the procedure available to increasing numbers of people. Professional opinion about disclosure of the use of DI has split, with physicians recommending against it and mental health professionals speaking of the value to the family and resultant child. Research on the psychological aspects of DI has grown over the years but is still limited.

Keywords

donor disclosure psychological motivation recipient counseling donor identity 

References

  1. 1.
    Thorn P. Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In: Covington SN, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 305–18.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose J. A critical analysis of sperm donation practices: the personal and social effects of disrupting the unity of biological and social relatedness for the offspring. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hard AD. Artificial impregnation. Med World. 1909;27:163–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morawski JG. Imaginings of parenthood: artificial insemination, experts, gender relations, and paternity. In: de Rivera J, Sarbin TR, editors. Believed in imaginings: the narrative construction of reality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. p. 229–46.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petok WD. (2007) Male-factor infertility: psychological, sociological and cultural perspectives. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Postgraduate Course.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmeli YS, Birenbaum-Carmeli D. The predicament of masculinity: towards understanding the male’s experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles J Res. 1994;30:663–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fader S. Sperm banking: a reproductive resource. Los Angeles: Cryobank, Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawyer N. Sperm donor limits that control for the ‘relative’ risk associated with the use of open-identity donors. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1089–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Applegarth LD, Kingsberg SA. The donor as patient: assessment and support. In: Covington SN, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 339–55.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cook R, Golombok S. A survey of semen donation: phase II—the view of the donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:951–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniels KR, Curson R, Lewis GM. Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinics. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:746–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick SR, et al. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:234–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emond M, Scheib JE. Why not donate sperm? A study of potential donors. Evol Hum Behav. 1998; 19:313–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kirkman M. Saviours and satyrs: ambivalence in narrative meanings of sperm provision. Cult Health Sex. 2004;6:319–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yee S. “Gift without price tag”: altruism in anonymous semen donation. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sydsjo G, Lampic C, Brandstrom S, Gudmondsson J, Karlstrom P-O, Solensten NG, et al. Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. BJOG. 2012;119:33–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ekerhovd E, Faurskov A, Werner C. Swedish sperm donors are driven by altruism, but shortage of sperm donors leads to reproductive traveling. Upsala J Med Sci. 2008;113:305–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riggs DW, Russell L. Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:266–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freemant JV, Kramer W, Golombok S. Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24:505–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mason MC. Male infertility—men talking. London: Routledge; 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fisher JRW, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:121–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schover LR, Thomas AJ. Overcoming male infertility. New York: Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eisenberg ML, Smith JF, Millstein SG, Walsh TJ, Breyer BN, Katz PP. Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:921–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paul MS, Berger R. Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2566–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hunter M, Salter-Ling N, Glover L. Donor insemination: telling children about their origins. Child Psychol Psychiat Rev. 2000;5:157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Daniels KR, Thorn P. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1792–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacob MC. Lesbian couples and single women. In: Burns LH, Covington SN, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. Pearl River, NY: Parthenon; 1999. p. 267–81.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gartrell N, Hamilton J, Banks A, Mosbacher D, Reed N, Sparks CH, et al. The national lesbian family study: 1. Interviews with prospective mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:272–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murray C, Golombok S. Going it alone: solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005;75:242–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shehab D, Duff J, Pasch LA, MacDougall K, Scheib JE, Nachtigall RD. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:179–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bos H, van Balen H. Children of the new reproductive technologies: social and genetic parenthood. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:429–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Golombok S, Badger S. Children raised in mother-headed families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers, at early adulthood. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:150–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacCallum F, Golombok S. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45: 1407–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kirkman M. Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2229–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, Golombok S. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:172–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Golombok S, MacCallum F, Goodman E, Rutter M. Families with children conceived by donor insemination: a follow-up at age 12. Child Dev. 2002;73:952–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blake L, Casey P, Readings J, Jadva V, Golombok S. “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7 year olds understand. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2527–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Turner A, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counseling and therapy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2041–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Using family members as gamete donors or surrogates. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:797–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent Practice Baltimore, MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations