Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Third-Party Reproduction pp 159–168Cite as

Sperm Donation: Psychological Aspects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Donor insemination (DI) is the oldest form of third-party reproduction. The first successful DI went unreported for 25 years, presumably to protect the individuals involved from embarrassment. Legal opinion, once decidedly against the procedure, has evolved over time, making the procedure available to increasing numbers of people. Professional opinion about disclosure of the use of DI has split, with physicians recommending against it and mental health professionals speaking of the value to the family and resultant child. Research on the psychological aspects of DI has grown over the years but is still limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thorn P. Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In: Covington SN, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 305–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rose J. A critical analysis of sperm donation practices: the personal and social effects of disrupting the unity of biological and social relatedness for the offspring. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hard AD. Artificial impregnation. Med World. 1909;27:163–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morawski JG. Imaginings of parenthood: artificial insemination, experts, gender relations, and paternity. In: de Rivera J, Sarbin TR, editors. Believed in imaginings: the narrative construction of reality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. p. 229–46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petok WD. (2007) Male-factor infertility: psychological, sociological and cultural perspectives. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Postgraduate Course.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carmeli YS, Birenbaum-Carmeli D. The predicament of masculinity: towards understanding the male’s experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles J Res. 1994;30:663–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fader S. Sperm banking: a reproductive resource. Los Angeles: Cryobank, Inc.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sawyer N. Sperm donor limits that control for the ‘relative’ risk associated with the use of open-identity donors. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1089–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Applegarth LD, Kingsberg SA. The donor as patient: assessment and support. In: Covington SN, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 339–55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cook R, Golombok S. A survey of semen donation: phase II—the view of the donors. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:951–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniels KR, Curson R, Lewis GM. Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinics. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:746–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick SR, et al. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:234–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Emond M, Scheib JE. Why not donate sperm? A study of potential donors. Evol Hum Behav. 1998; 19:313–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirkman M. Saviours and satyrs: ambivalence in narrative meanings of sperm provision. Cult Health Sex. 2004;6:319–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yee S. “Gift without price tag”: altruism in anonymous semen donation. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sydsjo G, Lampic C, Brandstrom S, Gudmondsson J, Karlstrom P-O, Solensten NG, et al. Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. BJOG. 2012;119:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekerhovd E, Faurskov A, Werner C. Swedish sperm donors are driven by altruism, but shortage of sperm donors leads to reproductive traveling. Upsala J Med Sci. 2008;113:305–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riggs DW, Russell L. Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freemant JV, Kramer W, Golombok S. Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24:505–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason MC. Male infertility—men talking. London: Routledge; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher JRW, Hammarberg K. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: an overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schover LR, Thomas AJ. Overcoming male infertility. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenberg ML, Smith JF, Millstein SG, Walsh TJ, Breyer BN, Katz PP. Perceived negative consequences of donor gametes from male and female members of infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:921–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paul MS, Berger R. Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunter M, Salter-Ling N, Glover L. Donor insemination: telling children about their origins. Child Psychol Psychiat Rev. 2000;5:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Daniels KR, Thorn P. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1792–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacob MC. Lesbian couples and single women. In: Burns LH, Covington SN, editors. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. Pearl River, NY: Parthenon; 1999. p. 267–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gartrell N, Hamilton J, Banks A, Mosbacher D, Reed N, Sparks CH, et al. The national lesbian family study: 1. Interviews with prospective mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:272–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray C, Golombok S. Going it alone: solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005;75:242–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shehab D, Duff J, Pasch LA, MacDougall K, Scheib JE, Nachtigall RD. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bos H, van Balen H. Children of the new reproductive technologies: social and genetic parenthood. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81:429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Golombok S, Badger S. Children raised in mother-headed families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers, at early adulthood. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. MacCallum F, Golombok S. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45: 1407–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirkman M. Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2229–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, Golombok S. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:172–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Golombok S, MacCallum F, Goodman E, Rutter M. Families with children conceived by donor insemination: a follow-up at age 12. Child Dev. 2002;73:952–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Blake L, Casey P, Readings J, Jadva V, Golombok S. “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7 year olds understand. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2527–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Turner A, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counseling and therapy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2041–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Using family members as gamete donors or surrogates. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Practice Baltimore, Maryland, 5608 Greenspring Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA

    William D. Petok

Authors
  1. William D. Petok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Petok .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Western Reserve University, Director of Fertility Services and In Vitro Fertilization, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    James M. Goldfarb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petok, W.D. (2014). Sperm Donation: Psychological Aspects. In: Goldfarb, J. (eds) Third-Party Reproduction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7168-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7169-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation