Skip to main content

An Interactive Cognitive-Emotional Model of the Person-Centered Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach

Abstract

Almost one decade has passed since the “abstract model of associative cognition and emotion” (AMACE) was first proposed to map constructs of the person-centered approach (PCA) to those of cognitive neuroscience. The primary purpose of this model is to complement the current perception of the PCA by a profound intellectual understanding of the cognitive and emotional effects of person-centered interaction . The resulting insight into major constructs of the PCA and their interplay as well as impact on interpersonal communication are aimed at a broader acceptance of its principles, leading to applications in numerous areas in which personal relationships are essential. This chapter will complement the initial version of AMACE by addressing recent research on its constructs and by exploring the effects of person-centered interaction in everyday relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in JHP, 43/4, 2003 by SAGE Publications, All rights reserved. © SAGE.

  2. 2.

    In fact, there exist several theories on the concept of short-term- or WM, going back to William James (1890). In AMACE, we just build on some essential features and thus abstract from further details.

  3. 3.

    As a consequence, highly complex problems can hardly be resolved purely cognitively (Claxton 1998).

  4. 4.

    Recently (Damasio 2000, p. 200 referring to Baars 1988), the notion of global working space has been developed as a way of describing the means by which focused attention and WM cooperate.

  5. 5.

    We hypothesize that it equally can flow to other mental images such as those symbolizing emotions and to various processes and dispositions in unconscious areas.

  6. 6.

    See, for example, Hatfield et al. 1994; Cacioppo and Gardner 1999.

  7. 7.

    An emotion is defined as a “specifically caused transient change of the organism state.” (Damasio 2000, p. 282). The brain induces emotions from a remarkably small number of brain sites. Most of them are located below the cerebral cortex and are known as subcortical.

  8. 8.

    A feeling is defined as “the private, mental experience of an emotion, while the term emotion should be used to designate the collection of responses, many of which are publicly observable.” (Damasio 2000, p. 42).

  9. 9.

    The scope of core consciousness is the here and now. Core consciousness is a simple biological phenomenon; it is stable across the lifetime of the organism; it is not exclusively human.

  10. 10.

    Damasio 2000, p. 147–148: “The records that we hold of objects and events that we once perceived include the motor adjustments we made to obtain the perception in the first place and also include the emotional reactions we had then. They all are co-registered in memory, albeit in separate systems. […] p. 161: …we retrieve not just sensory data but also accompanying motor and emotional data […] we recall not just sensory characteristics of an actual object but the past reactions of the organism to that object.” For the purposes of this article, we emphasize emotional aspects and ignore motor-related ones. However, the function of the body is central in the chapter by Carol Wolter-Gustafson in this volume.

  11. 11.

    In fact, two categories of rigid chunks belong to zone II. First, (neutral) learned constructs lacking one’s own experience and second, introjections with more or less distorted experience. In our view, based on Damasio (2000), chunks need at least some minimal OrgExp symbolization in order to be able to be symbolized as chunks in WM and LTM.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1991). Cognitive psychology and its applications (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret-Lennard, G. T. (2005). Relationship at the centre healing in a troubled World. Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M. (2009). Constructing emotions and accommodating schemas: A model of self-exploration, symbolization, and development. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 8(1), 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination, behavior matching, and interpersonal synchrony. In R. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozart, J. D., Zimring F. M. & Tausch R. (2002). Client-centered therapy: the evolution of a revolution. In J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic Psychotherapies: Handbook of Research and Practice. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and Memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L., & McGaugh, (1998). Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 294–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. J. (2010). Person-Centered Psychotherapies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J., & Seeman, J. (2002). Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (1998). Hare brain and tortoise mind—why intelligence increases when we think less. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. H., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2010). Learner-centered Instruction: Building relationships for student success. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens—body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. Orlando: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2012). The self comes to mind. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. (1978). Focusing. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Paivio, S. C. (1997). Working with emotions in psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3, 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemi, A. (2010). Empowering the implicitly functioning relationship. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies. 10(1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, J. (2007). Actualizing tendency: The link between PCE and interdisciplinary systems theory. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 6(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, J. (2008). Self-actualization: person-centred approach and systems theory. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS-books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lago, C. (2011). The handbook of transcultural conselling and psychotherapy. UK: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux, M. (2007). Der Personzentrierte Ansatz und die Neurowissenschaften. [The Peron Centered Approach and Neuroscience, in German] München: Ernst Reinhard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux, M. (2010). The magic of encounter : The person-centered approach and the neurosciences. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 9(4), 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marci, C. D., Ham, J., Moran, E., & Orr, S. P. (2007). Physiologic correlates of preceived therapist empathy and social-emotional process during psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (2011). Learner-centered practices: Providing the context for positive learner development, motivation, and achievement (Chapter 7). In J. Meece & J. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, D., & Cooper, M. (2005). Working at relational depth in counselling and psychotherapy. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). Person-centered e-learning in action: Can technology help to manifest person-centered values in academic environments? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 45 (4), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2013). Characteristics and effects of person-centered technology enhanced learning. In J. H. D. Cornelius-White, R. Motschnig-Pitrik & M. Lux (Eds.), Interdisciplinary applications of the person-centered approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (2010). Co-actualization: A new construct for understanding well-functioning relationships. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50 (3), 374–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Lux, M. (2008). The person centered approach meets neuroscience: Mutual Support for C. R. Rogers’s and A. Damasio’s Theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48, July, 287–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Nykl, L. (2001). The role and modeling of context in a cognitive model of rogers’ person-centered approach. In Proceedings of CONTEXT’01, Internat and interdisciplinary conference on the modeling of context, LNAI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science and AI. Wien, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Nykl, L. (2003). Towards a Cognitive-Emotional Model of Rogers’s Person-Centered Approach. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43 (4), 8–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykl, L. (2000). Psychologische Kontexte in Rogers’ Psychotherapie - das Selbst im Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeitstheorie. [Psychological Contexts in Rogers‘Psychotherapy – the Self in the Center of Personality Theory, in German]. Virya - Zeitschrift für Psychotherapie und Kommunikation. L. Nykl (Ed). 4, 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykl, L. (2005). Beziehung im Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung - C. Rogers im Vergleich mit Behaviorismus, Psychoanalyse und anderen Theorien - Mutter-Kind und andere Beziehungen. [Relationships in the Center of Personal Development – C. Rogers in Comparison with Behaviorism, Psychoanalysis and Other Theories – Mother-Child and Other Relationships, in German]. Wien: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykl, L. (2012). Carl Ransom Rogers a jeho teorie. Přístup zaměřený na člověka. [Carl Ransom Rogers and his theories. Person-Centered Approach, in Czech]. Praha: Grada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykl, L. & Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2002). Uniting Rogers’ and Vygotsky’s Theories on Personality and Learning. Proceedings of Carl Rogers Conference 2002, San Diego, USA. http://textedu.com/f2/download/uniting-rogers-and-vygotsky-s-theories-on-personality-and-learning.pdf (retrieved 2012/02/28).

  • Piaget, J. (1981). Über Jean Piaget. Sein Werk aus seiner Sicht. München: Kindler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12, 410–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C., R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy. London Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context (pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person—a psychotherapists’ view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to Learn for the 80’s. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent communication: a language of life. PuddleDancer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryback, D. (1998). Putting emotional intelligence to work. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, R., Elliot, R. (2001). Process-Outcome Research on Humanistic Therapy Variables. In J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic Psychotherapies: Handbook of Research and Practice. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J. & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality 71(5), 835–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1999). Memory; from mind to molecules. New York: Scientific American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (1995). Emotion and cognition in experiential therapy: a dialectical constructivist position. In H. Rosen & K. Kuhelwein (Eds.), Constructing realities. New York: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. C. (2007). Facilitating empathy. European Psychotherapy, 7, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, D. A., & Rice, L. N. (1974). Innovations in client-centered therapy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renate Motschnig-Pitrik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Nykl, L. (2013). An Interactive Cognitive-Emotional Model of the Person-Centered Approach. In: Cornelius-White, J., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Lux, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7141-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics