Abstract
Almost one decade has passed since the “abstract model of associative cognition and emotion” (AMACE) was first proposed to map constructs of the person-centered approach (PCA) to those of cognitive neuroscience. The primary purpose of this model is to complement the current perception of the PCA by a profound intellectual understanding of the cognitive and emotional effects of person-centered interaction . The resulting insight into major constructs of the PCA and their interplay as well as impact on interpersonal communication are aimed at a broader acceptance of its principles, leading to applications in numerous areas in which personal relationships are essential. This chapter will complement the initial version of AMACE by addressing recent research on its constructs and by exploring the effects of person-centered interaction in everyday relationships.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in JHP, 43/4, 2003 by SAGE Publications, All rights reserved. © SAGE.
- 2.
In fact, there exist several theories on the concept of short-term- or WM, going back to William James (1890). In AMACE, we just build on some essential features and thus abstract from further details.
- 3.
As a consequence, highly complex problems can hardly be resolved purely cognitively (Claxton 1998).
- 4.
- 5.
We hypothesize that it equally can flow to other mental images such as those symbolizing emotions and to various processes and dispositions in unconscious areas.
- 6.
- 7.
An emotion is defined as a “specifically caused transient change of the organism state.” (Damasio 2000, p. 282). The brain induces emotions from a remarkably small number of brain sites. Most of them are located below the cerebral cortex and are known as subcortical.
- 8.
A feeling is defined as “the private, mental experience of an emotion, while the term emotion should be used to designate the collection of responses, many of which are publicly observable.” (Damasio 2000, p. 42).
- 9.
The scope of core consciousness is the here and now. Core consciousness is a simple biological phenomenon; it is stable across the lifetime of the organism; it is not exclusively human.
- 10.
Damasio 2000, p. 147–148: “The records that we hold of objects and events that we once perceived include the motor adjustments we made to obtain the perception in the first place and also include the emotional reactions we had then. They all are co-registered in memory, albeit in separate systems. […] p. 161: …we retrieve not just sensory data but also accompanying motor and emotional data […] we recall not just sensory characteristics of an actual object but the past reactions of the organism to that object.” For the purposes of this article, we emphasize emotional aspects and ignore motor-related ones. However, the function of the body is central in the chapter by Carol Wolter-Gustafson in this volume.
- 11.
In fact, two categories of rigid chunks belong to zone II. First, (neutral) learned constructs lacking one’s own experience and second, introjections with more or less distorted experience. In our view, based on Damasio (2000), chunks need at least some minimal OrgExp symbolization in order to be able to be symbolized as chunks in WM and LTM.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1991). Cognitive psychology and its applications (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
Baars, B. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.
Barret-Lennard, G. T. (2005). Relationship at the centre healing in a troubled World. Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.
Behr, M. (2009). Constructing emotions and accommodating schemas: A model of self-exploration, symbolization, and development. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 8(1), 44–62.
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination, behavior matching, and interpersonal synchrony. In R. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bozart, J. D., Zimring F. M. & Tausch R. (2002). Client-centered therapy: the evolution of a revolution. In J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic Psychotherapies: Handbook of Research and Practice. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and Memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.
Cahill, L., & McGaugh, (1998). Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 294–299.
Cain, D. J. (2010). Person-Centered Psychotherapies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cain, J., & Seeman, J. (2002). Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Claxton, G. (1998). Hare brain and tortoise mind—why intelligence increases when we think less. London: Fourth Estate.
Cornelius-White, J. H., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2010). Learner-centered Instruction: Building relationships for student success. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens—body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage.
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. Orlando: Harcourt.
Damasio, A. (2012). The self comes to mind. London: Vintage.
Gendlin, E. (1978). Focusing. New York: Bantam Books.
Greenberg, L. S., & Paivio, S. C. (1997). Working with emotions in psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3, 529–535.
Ikemi, A. (2010). Empowering the implicitly functioning relationship. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies. 10(1), 28–42.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kriz, J. (2007). Actualizing tendency: The link between PCE and interdisciplinary systems theory. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 6(1), 30–44.
Kriz, J. (2008). Self-actualization: person-centred approach and systems theory. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS-books.
Lago, C. (2011). The handbook of transcultural conselling and psychotherapy. UK: McGraw Hill.
Lux, M. (2007). Der Personzentrierte Ansatz und die Neurowissenschaften. [The Peron Centered Approach and Neuroscience, in German] München: Ernst Reinhard.
Lux, M. (2010). The magic of encounter : The person-centered approach and the neurosciences. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 9(4), 274–289.
Marci, C. D., Ham, J., Moran, E., & Orr, S. P. (2007). Physiologic correlates of preceived therapist empathy and social-emotional process during psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 103–111.
McCombs, B. L. (2011). Learner-centered practices: Providing the context for positive learner development, motivation, and achievement (Chapter 7). In J. Meece & J. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Mearns, D., & Cooper, M. (2005). Working at relational depth in counselling and psychotherapy. London: SAGE.
Miller, B. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). Person-centered e-learning in action: Can technology help to manifest person-centered values in academic environments? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 45 (4), 503–530.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2013). Characteristics and effects of person-centered technology enhanced learning. In J. H. D. Cornelius-White, R. Motschnig-Pitrik & M. Lux (Eds.), Interdisciplinary applications of the person-centered approach. New York: Springer.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (2010). Co-actualization: A new construct for understanding well-functioning relationships. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50 (3), 374–398.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Lux, M. (2008). The person centered approach meets neuroscience: Mutual Support for C. R. Rogers’s and A. Damasio’s Theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48, July, 287–319.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Nykl, L. (2001). The role and modeling of context in a cognitive model of rogers’ person-centered approach. In Proceedings of CONTEXT’01, Internat and interdisciplinary conference on the modeling of context, LNAI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science and AI. Wien, Heidelberg: Springer.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Nykl, L. (2003). Towards a Cognitive-Emotional Model of Rogers’s Person-Centered Approach. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43 (4), 8–45.
Nykl, L. (2000). Psychologische Kontexte in Rogers’ Psychotherapie - das Selbst im Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeitstheorie. [Psychological Contexts in Rogers‘Psychotherapy – the Self in the Center of Personality Theory, in German]. Virya - Zeitschrift für Psychotherapie und Kommunikation. L. Nykl (Ed). 4, 1–108.
Nykl, L. (2005). Beziehung im Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung - C. Rogers im Vergleich mit Behaviorismus, Psychoanalyse und anderen Theorien - Mutter-Kind und andere Beziehungen. [Relationships in the Center of Personal Development – C. Rogers in Comparison with Behaviorism, Psychoanalysis and Other Theories – Mother-Child and Other Relationships, in German]. Wien: LIT-Verlag.
Nykl, L. (2012). Carl Ransom Rogers a jeho teorie. Přístup zaměřený na člověka. [Carl Ransom Rogers and his theories. Person-Centered Approach, in Czech]. Praha: Grada.
Nykl, L. & Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2002). Uniting Rogers’ and Vygotsky’s Theories on Personality and Learning. Proceedings of Carl Rogers Conference 2002, San Diego, USA. http://textedu.com/f2/download/uniting-rogers-and-vygotsky-s-theories-on-personality-and-learning.pdf (retrieved 2012/02/28).
Piaget, J. (1981). Über Jean Piaget. Sein Werk aus seiner Sicht. München: Kindler.
Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12, 410–430.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rogers, C., R. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy. London Constable.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context (pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person—a psychotherapists’ view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.
Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to Learn for the 80’s. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2003). Nonviolent communication: a language of life. PuddleDancer Press.
Ryback, D. (1998). Putting emotional intelligence to work. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Sachse, R., Elliot, R. (2001). Process-Outcome Research on Humanistic Therapy Variables. In J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic Psychotherapies: Handbook of Research and Practice. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J. & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality 71(5), 835–869.
Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison Wesley.
Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1999). Memory; from mind to molecules. New York: Scientific American Library.
Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (1995). Emotion and cognition in experiential therapy: a dialectical constructivist position. In H. Rosen & K. Kuhelwein (Eds.), Constructing realities. New York: Jossey Bass.
Watson, J. C. (2007). Facilitating empathy. European Psychotherapy, 7, 61–76.
Wexler, D. A., & Rice, L. N. (1974). Innovations in client-centered therapy. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Nykl, L. (2013). An Interactive Cognitive-Emotional Model of the Person-Centered Approach. In: Cornelius-White, J., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Lux, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7141-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7141-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7140-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7141-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)