Skip to main content

The Person-Centered Approach in Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach

Abstract

The core of this article is the elaboration of characteristics of researching that spring from personal attitudes and values related to core concepts of the person-centered approach. These are worked out by means of a selective literature review. Subsequently, two approaches to research in social sciences and educational technology are described that integrate these characteristics, namely personal conversation as a research method and (participatory) action research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These questions are primarily adapted from Rogers (1985), except for “What is my heart truly burning for?” which was adapted from a question Jürgen Kriz asked doctorate students in a course on scientific methods at the University of Vienna in the summer term 2012.

  2. 2.

    Personal contribution by Renate Motschnig in an online conversation with the first author in 2012.

References

  • Baskerville, R. L. (1999). Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(19), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalisms. A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Nichol, L. (1996). On dialogue., Routledge Classics Series London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism. An introduction to Roy Bhaskar′s philosophy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory′s controversiality. Hypatia, 19(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1983). Money, sex and power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutterer, R. (1990). Authentic science: Some implications of Carl Rogers′s reflections on science. Person-Centered Review, 5(1), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, J. (1999). Von der “science-fiction” zur “science”: Methodologische und methodische Bemerkungen zur Frage der “Wissenschaftlichkeit von Psychotherapie-verfahren”. [Fromscience-fictiontoscience”: methodological and methodic notes on the question ofscientificalness of psychotherapy-methods”.] Report Psychologie, 24, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, J. (2000). Perspektiven zur “Wissenschaftlichkeit” von Psychotherapie. [Perspectives onscientificalnessof psychotherapy.] In M. Hermer, (Eds.), Psychotherapeutische Perspektiven am Beginn des 21 Jahrhunderts (pp. 43-66). Tübingen: DGVT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, J. (2008). Self-actualization. Person-centred approach and systems theory. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS-Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, I. (1985). Das persönliche Gespräch als Weg in der psychologischen Forschung. [The personal conversation as way in psychological research.] Zeitschrift für personenzentrierte Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 4, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, I. (2000). Das persönliche Gespräch als Weg in der psychologischen Forschung. [The personal conversation as way in psychological research.] Köln: GwG-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, I., Schultz von Thun, F., & Tausch, R. (1981). Sich verständlich ausdrücken. [Expressing oneself understandably.] München: Reinhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, D., & McLeod, J. (1984). A person-centered approach to research. In R. F. Levant & J. M. Shlien (Eds.), Client-centered therapy and the person-centered approach: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 370–389). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2004). Blended Learning in einer großen Informatik-Lehrveranstaltung: Personenzentriert oder Handlungsorientiert? [Blended learning in a large computer science course: person-centered or activity-oriented?] In Handlungsorientiertes Lernen und eLearning: Grundlagen und Praxisbeispiele (pp. 219–246). Wien: R. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Mallich, K. (2004). Effects of person-centered attitudes on professional and social competence in a blended learning paradigm. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 176–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2006). Participatory action research in a blended learning course on project management soft skills. In 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1–6). Presented at the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Kabicher, S., Figl, K., & Santos, A. M. (2007). Person-centered, technology enhanced learning in action: Action research in a course on organizational development. In 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 6–11). Presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natiello, P. (1990). The person-centered approach, collaborative power, and cultural transformation. Person-Centered Review, 5(3), 268–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Heron, J. (1986). Research with people: The paradigm of co-operative experiential inquiry. Person-Centered Review, 1(4), 456–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1955). Persons or science? A philosophical question. American Psychologist, 10(7), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology, a study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256)., Formulations of the Person and the Social Context New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1995). On becoming a person. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Original work published 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1968). Some thoughts regarding the current presuppositions of the behavioral sciences. In W. Coulson & C. R. Rogers (Eds.), Man and the science of man (pp. 55–72). Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1985). Toward a more human science of the person. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(4), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Double Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulph, M. (1998). Stolen lives: The effects of the development of self of men who have experienced sexual abuse in childhood. Unpublished master′s dissertation, University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, P. (2010). Researching in a person-centered way. In M. Cooper, J. C. Watson, & D. Hölldampf (Eds.), Person-centered and experiential therapies work: A review of the research on counseling, psychotherapy and related practices (pp. 215–239). Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, P., & Mitchell-Williams, Z. (2002). The theory and experience of person-centered research. In J. C. Watson, R. N. Goldman, & M. S. Warner (Eds.), Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy in the 21st century: Advances in theory, research and practice (pp. 291–302). Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter-Gustafson, C. (1990). How person-centered theory informed my qualitative research on women′s lived experience of wholeness. Person-Centered Review, 5(2), 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Haselberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haselberger, D., Hutterer, R. (2013). The Person-Centered Approach in Research. In: Cornelius-White, J., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Lux, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Handbook of the Person-Centered Approach. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7141-7_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics