Abstract
An 8-year-old boy is presented for a major ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedure. A reinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) (Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) is used to secure the airway after induction of general anesthesia. Normally, these tubes are removed at the end of the procedure once the tracheostomy has been performed. In this case, however, due to surgical reasons, a tracheostomy is not done, and the patient is taken to the intensive care unit (ICU) with the reinforced ETT in place. You decide to leave the ETT in the trachea and to ventilate the child mechanically overnight because he exhibits marked head and neck edema after 10 h of surgery. The possibility of potential severe laryngeal edema makes you decide not to change the reinforced ETT with a standard ETT over a tube changer. The next morning, on awakening from the sedation, the patient bites down vigorously on the reinforced ETT. Due to the nature of the reinforced ETT, the lumen becomes completely occluded and will not re-expand. The patient cannot breathe nor can the lungs be ventilated. This results in oxygen desaturation to 80 %. Cyanosis becomes evident. The jaw can easily be opened.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Vogel T, Brock-Utne JG. Solution to an occluded reinforced (armored) endotracheal tube. Am J Anesthesiol. 1997;2:58–61.
Robles B, Hester J, Brock-Utne JG. Remember the gum-elastic bougie at extubation. J Clin Anesth. 1993;5:329–31.
King H-K, Lewis K. Guedel oropharyngeal airway does not prevent patient biting on the endotracheal tube. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:6.
Kong CS. A small child can bite through an armored tracheal tube. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:263.
Suggested Reading
Adamson DH. A problem of prolonged oral intubation: case report. Can J Anaesth. 1971;18:213–4.
Dempsey GA, Barrett PJ. Hazard with the reinforced laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:660–1.
Gemma M, Ferrazza C. “Dental trauma” to oral airways. Can J Anaesth. 1989;36:951.
Hoffman CO, Swanson GA. Oral reinforced endotracheal tube crushed and perforated from biting. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:548–53.
Hull JM. Occlusion of armoured tubes. Anesthesia. 1989;44:790.
Martens P. Persistent narrowing of an armoured tube. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:716–7.
McTaggart RA, Shustack A, Noseworthy T, Johnston R. Another cause of obstruction in an armored endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:164.
Peck MJ, Neddleman SM. Reinforced endotracheal tube obstruction. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:193.
Singh B, Srivastava SK, Chhabra B. Reinforced orotracheal tube obstruction: pharyngeal or oral? Anesth Analg. 1994;79:193–4.
Spiess BD, Rothenberg DM, Buckley S. Complete airway obstruction of armored endotracheal tubes. Anesth Analg. 1991;73:95–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brock-Utne, J.G. (2013). Case 4: Occluded Reinforced (Armored) Endotracheal Tube. In: Near Misses in Pediatric Anesthesia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7040-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7040-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7039-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7040-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)