Errata to: C. J. Byrne, The Moon’s Near Side Megabasin and Far Side Bulge, SpringerBriefs in Astronomy, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6949-0

Underlined text is the corrected text. Hence, the sentences should read as given in “Text should read” column in the below tables.

Errata

Page number

Location

Text should read

Remarks

8

Section 2.2, first paragraph

The term “basin” was introduced by lunar researchers including those from the United States Geologic Service (USGS).

 

16

Section 3.1.1, first paragraph

A new method …digital elevation maps … Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (an example is shown in Fig. 1.2).

 

54

Last paragraph

3,950 m

Note: The error occurs twice in this paragraph.

65

Third paragraph

My response … double the length and width of the area vetted for safety.

 

70

Fig. 6.16 legend

…(higher lunar Moho, the lunar equivalent of Earth’s Mohoroviĉić discontinuity) than is shown here.

 

71

Section 6.4.1, next to last paragraph

…(typically 10–30 μm)…

 

78

Section 7.3, second paragraph

…. Depth of the SPA crater…

 

85

Top

In a vertical impact: … that follows the geoid, the material …

 

90

Fig. 8.2

 

Note: Artwork color should agree with legend (see figure corrections below).

100

Fig. 9.1

 

Note: The order of maps should be corrected (see figure corrections below).

104

Section 9.5, third paragraph, near bottom

A simulation finds a median velocity of 8.6 km/s for this population …

 

108

Second paragraph

…. largest LHB impactors left the E-belt …

 

110

Last sentence

… the age of the Imbrium Basin is taken to be 3.85 Ga …

 

115

Section 10.3, second paragraph

The model … offset of the center of gravity from the center of figure and compare …

 

Typos and Clarity Corrections

Page number

Location

Text should read

Remarks

33

First paragraph

The full set …radial profiles of the set…

 

49

First line

The Near Side Megabasin (NSM) is …of its apparent crater that covered…

 

62

Section 6.2.6, last paragraph

There is an irony … impact or volcanism …

 

66

Section 6.2.9, second paragraph

Vallis Procellarum

 

69

Section 6.3.4

The GRAIL mission …lowest altitude of its mission…

 

70

Section 6.3.4: last paragraph, last sentence

…it would be a constraint…

 

71

Section 6.4.1, last paragraph, first sentence

An improved measuring instrument (Kennedy and de Laeter 1994) was used to analyze zircons from several samples from two widely separated Apollo landing sites. Precise ages were determined for several events that have been strong enough to reset the zircon clocks (Nemchin et al. 2008, 2009).

Note: The first sentence should be replaced with the given text.

74

Section 6.5, next to last paragraph

…Kaguya spectroscopy

 

75

First and second paragraphs

 

Note: “Identification of the SPA …southern part of its cavity” repeated twice. Duplicate should be deleted.

80

Section 7.3.3, fourth paragraph

The maps in …from Kaguya data, (Sasaki et al. 2011) that present a coherent ….

Note: Change period to comma after the word “data”, and underlined word should be “present” not “presents”.

83

Section 7.3.4, second paragraph

…one of S. T. Stewart’s simulations are…

 

83

Last line

… was ejected vertically collapsed into the crater.

 

84

Fig. 7.10 legend

… 3-D simulation of an SPA impact …

 

87

Section 7.6, end of first paragraph

So the SPA is probably younger than the NSM, which was …

Note: “(SPA)” after the term “NSM” should be deleted.

99

Section 9.3, second paragraph

…those elements that form gasses in the space environment.

 

101

Second paragraph

… the interacting NSM and SPA is discussed in Chap. 7.

Note: The letter “s” should be deleted after the term “SPA”.

103

Top

…for the Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) to crystallize …

 

103

Section 9.4.4, last sentence

… mineral patterns associated with their melt columns.

 

112

Third paragraph

Identifying two additional megabasins, the NSM and the CM, to ….

Note: Underlined word spelling has been corrected, and comma has been inserted after “CM”

115

Third paragraph

Analysis of the ages … 3.8–3.9 Ga, implying the LHB, but …

Note: Comma should be added after the term “LHB”.

116

Next to last sentence

… is associated with melt columns.

Note: End period should be added.

Revised Figures

Figure 8.2 should read as:

Fig. 8.2
figure 1

The interaction between the current topography of the CM and the NSM is shown along a great circle that connects the centers of the two megabasins with the angle proceeding toward Moscoviense. The model of the CM is red, the NSM model is in blue, and the superposition of the two is in black. There are two ways to interpret this model, depending on whether the CM impact preceded or succeeded the NSM event

Figure 9.1 should read as:

Fig. 9.1
figure 3

The models of pre-Nectarisn age group 1, first NSM, then CM, then SPA and finally the four mounds. a Near side megabasin (NSM), b Chaplygin-Mandels’shtam Basin (CM), c South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA), d Mounds