Skip to main content

Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Management of Urolithiasis

Abstract

Since the initial description of “percutaneous pyelolithotomy” by Fernstrom and Johansson in 1976, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the standard for the treatment of large renal or proximal ureteral stones [Fernström and Johansson (Scand J Urol Nephrol 10(3):257–259, 1976)]. Recently, various versions of the procedure have expanded indications to treat a variety of stone burdens and have rendered open nephrolithotomy as a historic procedure. With shorter procedure times, lower transfusion rates, lower narcotic requirements, shorter hospital stay, faster convalescence, and lower cost, PCNL can be applied to nearly any stone burden or location [Snyder and Smith (J Urol 136(2):351–354, 1986)]. Despite overall safety and effectiveness of PCNL for the therapy of renal stones [Preminger et al. (J Urol 173(6):1991–2000, 2005)], PCNL can still be associated with significant morbidity, especially when complications are monitored in a standardized fashion. One recent study cited a nearly 60 % complication rate [de la Rosette et al. (J Urol 180(6):2489–2493, 2008)]. While the majority of these complications are mild, the urologist must be ready to prevent, appropriately identify, and treat any complication that he/she could encounter during or after PCNL.

The focus of this chapter is to provide the reader with an appreciation for the complications associated with PCNL. A review of recent literature pertaining to the prevention, early identification, and proper management of issues that may arise during or after PCNL will be discussed followed by a case presentation used to highlight lessons learned during this summary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Snyder JA, Smith AD. Staghorn calculi: percutaneous extraction versus anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1986;136(2):351–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1991–2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ, Laguna MP, et al. Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de la Rosette JJ, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanger MJ, Thompson LA, Young AJ, Lieberman HR. Anticoagulant activity of select dietary supplements. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(2):107–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Opondo D, Tefekli A, Esen T, Labate G, Sangam K, De Lisa A, et al. Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(6):1181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – a critical review. Eur Urol. 2008;54(5):994–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen D, O’Brien T, Tiptaft R, Glass J. Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005;19(3):279–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C. The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahin A, Atsü N, Erdem E, Oner S, Bilen C, Bakkaloğlu M, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients aged 60 years or older. J Endourol. 2001;15(5):489–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Okeke Z, Smith AD, Labate G, D’Addessi A, Venkatesh R, Assimos D, et al. Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients. J Endourol. 2012;26(8):996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Resorlu B, Diri A, Atmaca AF, Tuygun C, Oztuna D, Bozkurt OF, et al. Can we avoid percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk elderly patients using the Charlson comorbidity index? Urology. 2012;79(5):1042–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carson 3rd CC, Danneberger JE, Weinerth JL. Percutaneous lithotripsy in morbid obesity. J Urol. 1988;139(2):243–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, et al. Outcome of ­percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koo BC, Burtt G, Burgess NA. Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int. 2004;93(9):1296–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Raman JD, Bensalah K, Pearle MS, Lotan Y. Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology. 2008;72(4):756–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Schuster T, Jackman SV, Averch TD. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy stratified by body mass index. J Endourol. 2010;24(4):547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bucuras V, Gopalakrishnam G, Wolf JS Jr, Sun Y, Bianchi G, Erdogru T, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: nephrolithotomy in 189 patients with solitary kidneys. J Endourol. 2012;26(4):336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Husmann DA, Miliner DS, Segura JW. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a simultaneous renal ­calculus: long-term followup. J Urol. 1995;153:1399–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tunc L, Tokgoz H, Tan MO, Kupeli B, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I. Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients. Int J Urol. 2004;11(10):831–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mosavi-Bahar SH, Amirzargar MA, Rahnavardi M, Moghaddam SM, Babbolhavaeji H, Amirhasani S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with kidney malformations. J Endourol. 2007;21(5):520–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rana AM, Bhojwani JP. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal anomalies of fusion, ectopia, rotation, hypoplasia, and pelvicalyceal aberration: uniformity in heterogeneity. J Endourol. 2009;23(4):609–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta NP, Mishra S, Seth A, Anand A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in abnormal kidneys: single-center experience. Urology. 2009;73(4):710–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krambeck AE, Leroy AJ, Patterson DE, Gettman MT. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy success in the transplant kidney. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2545–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Basiri A, Karrami H, Moghaddam SM, Shadpour P. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with or without a history of open nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2003;17(4):213–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Gülmez I, Karacagil M. Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol. 2007;21(4):401–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuruk E, Tefekli A, Sari E, Karadag MA, Tepeler A, Binbay M, et al. Does previous extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy affect the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Urol. 2009;182(5):2534–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, Breda A, Botoca M, Rassweiler J, et al. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1293–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B, Rioja J, Walfridsson H, D’Addessi A, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1263–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Singla M, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Gupta N, Ansari MS, Dubey D, et al. Aggressive approach to staghorn calculi-safety and efficacy of multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2008;71(6):1039–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Duty B, Okhunov Z, Smith A, Okeke Z. The debate over percutaneous nephrolithotomy positioning: a comprehensive review. J Urol. 2011;186(1):20–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomaszewski JJ, Ortiz TD, Gayed BA, Smaldone MC, Jackman SV, Averch TD. Renal access by urologist or radiologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(11):1733–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang KJ, Jiang LH, Wang L, Li H. 356 Urologist versus radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy access under fluoroscopic guidance: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2010;9(2):135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Watterson JD, Soon S, Jana K. Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J Urol. 2006;176(1):142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Safak M, Gögüş C, Soygür T. Nephrostomy tract dilation using a balloon dilator in percutaneous renal surgery: experience with 95 cases and comparison with the fascial dilator system. Urol Int. 2003;71(4):382–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Davidoff R, Bellman GC. Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage. J Urol. 1997;157(4):1229–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gönen M, Istanbulluoglu OM, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H. Balloon dilatation versus Amplatz dilatation for nephrostomy tract dilatation. J Endourol. 2008;22:901–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Benway BM, Nakada SY. Balloon dilation of nephrostomy tracts. J Endourol. 2008;22(9):1875–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, Chomón GB, Grasso M, Saba P, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methodsin 5537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):933–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, et al. Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2010;184(6):2373–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Amer T, Ahmed K, Bultitude M. Standard versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2012;88(4):373–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bellman C, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157(5):1578–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stoller ML, Wolf Jr JS, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with ­percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1994;152(6 Pt 1):1977–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Duvdevani M, Razvi H, Sofer M, Beiko DT, Nott L, Chew BH, et al. Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. J Endourol. 2007;21(8):824–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sampaio FJB. Surgical anatomy of the kidney. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Kavoussi LR, editors. Smith’s textbook of endourology. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1996. p. 153–84.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Martin X, Murat FJ, Feitosa LC, Rouvière O, Lyonnet D, Gelet A, et al. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy: results of hyperselective embolization. Eur Urol. 2000;37(2):136–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lam HS, Lingeman JE, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Knapp PM, Scott JW, et al. Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: a decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992;148(3 Pt 2):1058–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dore B, Conort P, Irani J, Amiel J, Ferriere JM, Glemain P, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in subjects over the age of 70: a multicentre retrospective study of 210 cases. Prog Urol. 2004;14:1140–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R, Cal C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage. Urology. 2007;69(4):603–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. El-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, El-Assmy AM, Mohsen T, Shoma AM, Eraky I, et al. Postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk ­factors. J Urol. 2007;177(2):576–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kerbl K, Picus DD, Clayman RV. Clinical experience with the Kaye nephrostomy tamponade catheter. Eur Urol. 1994;25(2):94–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 2001;166(4):1242–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S. Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol. 2006;20(7):491–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hopper KD, Sherman JI, Williams MD, Ghaed N. The variable anteroposterior position of the retropertoneal colon to the kidneys. Invest Radiol. 1987;22(4):298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hadar H, Gadoth N. Positional relations of colon and kidney determined by perirenal fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143(4):773–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Neustein P, Barbaric ZL, Kaufman JJ. Nephrocolic fistula: a complication of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 1986;135(3):571–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Appel R, Musmanno MC, Knight JG. Nephrocolic fistula complicating percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 1988;140(5):1007–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Culkin DJ, Wheeler Jr JS, Canning JR. Nephro-duodenal fistula: a complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1985;134(3):528–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Kumar A, Banerjee GK, Tewari A, Srivastava A. Isolated duodenal injury during relook percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol. 1994;74(3):382–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hopper KD, Yakes WF. The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(1):115–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kondás J, Szentgyörgyi E, Váczi L, Kiss A. Splenic injury: a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994;(4)26:399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Thomas AA, Pierce G, Walsh RM, Sands M, Noble M. Splenic injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. JSLS. 2009;13(2):233–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kontothanassis D, Bissas A. Biliary peritonitis complicating percutaneous nephrostomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 1997;29(5):529–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Saxby MF. Biliary peritonitis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol. 1996;77(3):465–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Fisher MB, Bianco Jr F, Carlin AM, Triest JA. Biliary peritonitis complicating percutaneous nephrolithomy requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(2 Pt 1):791–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Roberts S, Bolton DM, Stoller ML. Hypothermia associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 1994;44(6):832–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, Badlani GH, Lewin B, Vernace F, et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148(1):177–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1987;138(3):485–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Cadeddu JA, Arrindell D, Moore RG. Near fatal air embolism during percutaneous nephrostomy placement. J Urol. 1997;158(4):1519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 1985;134(6):1077–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lang EK. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and lithotripsy: a multi-institutional survey of complications. Radiology. 1987;162(1 Pt 1):25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J, Micali S, Kumar A, Moore RG, et al. Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 1998;52(1):48–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Korets R, Graversen JA, Kates M, Mues AC, Gupta M. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy systemic inflammatory response: a prospective analysis of preoperative urine, renal pelvic urine and stone cultures. J Urol. 2011;186(5):1899–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bag S, Kumar S, Taneja N, Sharma V, Mandal AK, Singh SK. One week of nitrofurantoin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. Urology. 2011;77(1):45–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2006;98(5):1075–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gutierrez J, Smith A, Geavlete P, Shah H, Kural AR, de Sio M, et al. Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2012. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  81. Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology. 2005;66(1):38–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Patterson DE, Segura JW, LeRoy AJ, Benson RC Jr, May G. The ­etiology and treatment of delayed bleeding following percutaneous lithotripsy. J Urol. 1985;133(3):447–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Sacha K, Szewczyk W, Bar K. Massive haemorrhage presenting as a complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(3):315–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Roth RA, Beckmann CF. Complications of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1988;15(2):155–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Parsons JK, Jarrett TW, Lancini V, Kavoussi LR. Infundibular stenosis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2002;167(1):35–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Chichakli R, Krause R, Voelzke B, Turk T. Incidence of perinephric hematoma after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008;22(6):1227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shadi Al Ekish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Prevention, Identification, and Treatment of Complications of PCNL

 

Preventative measures

Identification

Treatment

Intraoperative complications

   

Bleeding

Solitary kidney, supracostal access, multiple access at high risk; unideal access at high risk as it may predispose to excessive torqueing

Poor visualization

Tamponade with renal access sheath, if red-out place Kaye tamponade reentry balloon or other large caliber Foley

Collecting system perforation

Avoid excessive pressure with ultrasonic or pneumatic lithotripsy device, ensure there is appropriate visualization and appreciation for anatomy during use of lithotripsy device

Direct visualization of injury or intraoperative antegrade nephrostogram revealing extravasation

Appropriate prolonged decompression of renal pelvis with indwelling JJ ureteral stent vs. PCNU

Colonic injury

Preoperative imaging with CT; prone position may decrease risk for bowel perforation

Stool or gas per PCN, opacification of colon during antegrade nephrostogram

Abort procedure, do not dilate tract (if not already done) withdrawal of PCN to colonic lumen

Liver or splenic injury

Preoperative imaging with CT if hepatomegaly or splenomegaly suspected

Excessive blood loss, hemodynamic instability, and severe abdominal pain

Intravenous fluid support and blood transfusion

Laparoscopic access to the collecting system

Conservative vs. exploration

Postoperative complications

   

Fever

Appropriate pain control and activity postoperatively, incentive spirometry

Routine vital check

Obtain cultures and chest X-ray if indicated, encourage incentive spirometry and ambulation, abx as indicated

Urosepsis

Ensure patient has negative or appropriately treated preoperative urine culture, consider prophylaxis with cipro or nitrofurantoin for 1 week prior to surgery

Consider sending urine and stone culture when patient has large stone or history of recurrent infections

Culture-based antibiotics, ICU setting if patient condition requires

Bleeding

Leaving a large-bore nephrostomy tube may not improve bleeding

Persistent drainage of bloody urine from nephrostomy tube, monitor hgb/hct

Transfuse as indicated, consider ongoing drainage, if persistent anemia consider angiography with or without concurrent access tract dilation to identify if bleeding is venous or arterial

Pulmonary

   

Pleural effusion

Avoid supracostal access.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy of costophrenic angle post lithotomy, CXR for any pulmonary symptoms (SOB, desaturation, etc.)

Conservative if small and asymptomatic

Chest intraoperative fluoroscopy

Thoracostomy tube if large and symptomatic

Nephro-pleural fistula

Avoid supracostal access

Persistent drainage from the thoracostomy tube placed for hydrothorax

Thoracostomy tube and ureteral stent

Nephrostogram

Retrograde pyelogram

Persistent drainage from percutaneous site

Nephrostogram before removing the nephrostomy tube to make sure that there is no distal ureteral obstruction due to stone fragments or blood clots

Prolonged urinary leakage from the nephrostomy tube site

Ureteral stent and antibiotics

Appendix 2: Percutaneous Nephrilithotomy Complications Rate in Different Major Studies

 

de la Rosette [7]

Duvdevani et al. [48]

Tefekli et al. [6]

Number of procedures

5,803

1,585

811

No complications

85.50 %

88.50 %

71.00 %

Fever (temp.  >  38.5)

10.50 %

Unknown

2.80 %

Urosepsis

Unknown

1.30 %

0.30 %

Significant bleeding

7.80 %

6.00 %

Unknown

Requiring transfusion

5.70 %

0.80 %

10.90 %

Renal pelvis perforation

3.40 %

1.80 %

1.10 %

Hydrothorax

1.80 %

1.00 %

 

Failure to complete procedure

1.70 %

Unknown

0.20 %

Pyelocutaneous fistula

Unknown

0.13 %

Unknown

Colonic perforation

Unknown

0.06 %

0.3 % (neighboring organ injury)

Bladder rupture

Unknown

0.06 %

Unknown

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al Ekish, S., Elsamra, S., Pareek, G. (2013). Complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. In: Nakada, S., Pearle, M. (eds) Surgical Management of Urolithiasis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6937-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6937-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6936-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6937-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics