Skip to main content

Post-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Drainage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Management of Urolithiasis

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was established as a reliable treatment of large stone burden several decades ago. PCNL technique continues to evolve, with consistent goals of decreasing morbidity and maximizing efficiency and cost-effectiveness. One key aspect of PCNL that has been the subject of debate and investigation is the method of postprocedure drainage. In the chapter to follow we review these modifications including tube size and type, tubeless with various types of internal drainage, and the totally tubeless PCNL. We conclude with a summary of the hemostatic agents used in the PCNL tract instead of external drainage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rupel E, Brown R. Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculous anuria. J Urol. 1941;46:177–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernström I, Johannson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lingeman JE, Newmark JR, Wong MYC. Classification and management of staghorn calculi. In: Smith AD, editor. Controversies in endourology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. p. 136–44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kerbl K, Rehman J, Landman J, Lee D, Sundaram C, Clayman RV. Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? J Endourol. 2002;16(5):281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan H, Zheng S, Liu L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q. The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):401–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, Bansai S, Yadav A, Goyal J. A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008;22(3):439–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol. 2000;14(9):735–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, Santa-Cruz RW, Newman GE, Albala DM, et al. Pain after ­percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol. 2003;17(6):411–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liatsikos EN, Hom D, Dinlenc CZ, Kapoor R, Alexianu M, Yohannes P, et al. Tail stent versus ­re-entry tube: a randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology. 2002;59(1):15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, Mhaskar SS, Wani KA, Patel SH, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus tubeless. J Urol. 2004;172(2):565–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paul EM, Marcovich R, Lee BR, Smith AD. Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):672–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Srinivasan AK, Herati A, Okeke Z, Smith AD. Renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1743–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wickham JE, Miller RA, Kellett MJ, Payne SR. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: one stage or two? Br J Urol. 1984;56(6):582–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Winfield HN, Weyman P, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal. J Urol. 1986;136(1):77–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(1):16–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellman GC, Davidov R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157(5):1578–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Limb P, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology. 2002;59(4):527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2001;58(3):345–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Singh J, Shah D, El-Hakin A, Lee BR, et al. No panacea for drainage after ­percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2004; 18(8):743–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Kharodawala S, Hedge SS, Bansal MB. A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore v tubeless. J Endourol. 2008;22(7):1433–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol. 2008;22(3):427–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(1):57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Ba’adani TH, Al-Kohlany KM, Al-Adimi A, Al-Towaitym, Al-Baadani T, Alwan M, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the new gold standard. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;40(3):603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goh M, Wolf Jr JS. Almost totally tubeless percutaneous renal nephrostolithotomy: further evolution of the technique. J Endourol. 1999;13(3):177–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter? J Endourol. 2008;22(2):273–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol. 2001;15(7):711–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Karami H, Jabbari M, Arbab AH. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 5 years of experience in 201 patients. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1411–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abou-Eiela A, Emran A, Mohsen MA, Reyad I, Bedair AS, Kader MA. Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):977–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta NP, Kesarwani P, Goel R, Aron M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2005;74(1):58–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Kurien A, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Desai M. Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL. BJU Int. 2010;106(7):1045–8. discussion 1048–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int. 2005;96(6):879–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sofer M, Beri A, Friedman A, Aviram G, Mabjeesh NJ, Chen J, et al. Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2007;70(3):412–6. discussion 416–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah HN, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2006;20(12):1016–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sofikerim M, Demirco D, Huri E, Erşekerci E, Karacagil M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):967–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rana AM, Mithani S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol. 2007;21(2):169–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Malcolm JB, Derweesh IH, Brightbill EK, Mehrazin R, DiBlasio CJ, Wake RW. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stone disease: single center experience. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4072–6. discussion 4076–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jou YC, Cheng MC, Lin CT, Chen PC, Shen JH. Nephrostomy tube-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with large stones and staghorn stones. Urology. 2006;67(1):30–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshani A, Neiroomand H, Nikpour S, Nadjafi-Semnani M, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones. J Endourol. 2008;22(7):1447–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shoma AM, Elshal AM. Nephrostomy tube placement after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: critical evaluation through a prospective randomized study. Urology. 2012;79(4):771–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang RM, Bellman GC. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients. Urology. 2004;63(6):1036–40. discussion 1040–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Weld KJ, Wake RW. Simultaneous bilateral tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2000;56(6):1057.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB. Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2005;66(3):500–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta NP, Kumar P, Aron M, Goel R. Bilateral simultaneous tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(3):313–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rana AM, Bhojwani JP, Junejo NN, Das Bhagia S. Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons? With comprehensive technique. Urology. 2008;71(4):581–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh I, Kumar A, Kumar P. “Ambulatory PCNL” (tubeless PCNL under regional anesthesia)—a preliminary report of 10 cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):35–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Hegde SS, Bansai M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral open renal surgery: a feasibility study with review of literature. J Endourol. 2008;22(1):19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Watkins SL, Kuo RL, Munch LC, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ectopic kidneys: over, around, or through. Urology. 2008;67(3):513–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Salem KH, Morsi HA, Omran A, Daw MA. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(3):235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ozturk A, Guven S, Kilinc M, Topbaş E, Piskin M, Arslan M. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it safe and effective in preschool children? J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1935–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aghamir SMK, Salavati A, Aloosh M, Farahmand H, Meysamie A, Pourmand G. Feasibility of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy under the age of 14 years: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):621–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008;22(2):267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H. Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(3):541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Aghamir SM, Mohammadi A, Mosavibahar SH, Meysamie AP. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal anomalies. J Endourol. 2008;22(9):2131–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardeş H. Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients requiring supracostal access. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):440–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Cicek T, Ozkardeş H. Bilateral simultaneous totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: preliminary report of six cases. J Endourol. 2009;23(8):1255–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shpall AI, Parekh AR, Bellman GC. Modification of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: antegrade stent with flank tether. Urology. 2006;68:880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley Jr FX, Timoney AG, Barry MJ. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life, and utility. J Urol. 2003;169(3):1065–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Kahn SA, Yan Y, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, et al. Clinical effectiveness of new stent design: randomized single-blind comparison of tail and double-pigtail stents. J Endourol. 2000;14(2):195–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Yew J, Bellman GC. Modified “tubeless” percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a tail-stent. Urology. 2003;62(2):346–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gonen M, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H. Double-j stenting compared with one night externalized ureteral catheter placement in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(1):27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Berkman DS, Lee MW, Landman J, Gupta M. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with reversed polaris loop stent: reduced postoperative pain and narcotic use. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2245–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Choe CH, L’Esperance JO, Auge BK. The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kram HB, Ocampo HP, Yamaguchi MP, Nathan RC, Shoemaker WC. Fibrin glue in renal and ureteral trauma. Urology. 1989;33(3):215–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Evans LA, Ferguson KH, Foley JP, Rozanski TA, Morey AF. Fibrin sealant for the management of genitourinary injuries, fistulas, and surgical complications. J Urol. 2003;169(4):1360–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pfab R, Ascherl R, Blümel G, Hartung R. Local hemostasis of nephrostomy tract with fibrin adhesive sealing in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 1987;13(1–2):118–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Mikhail AA, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC. Use of fibrin glue in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2003;61(5):910–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Noller MW, Baughman SM, Morey AF, Auge BK. Fibrin sealant enables tubeless percutaneous stone surgery. J Urol. 2004;172(1):166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shah HN, Hegde S, Shah JN, Mohile PD, Yuvaraja TB, Bansal MB. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2488–92. discussion 2492–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Borin JF, Sala LG, Eichel L, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy using hemostatic gelatin matrix. J Endourol. 2005;19(6):614–7. discussion 617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kaufmann OG, Sountoulides P, Kaplan A, Louie M, McDougall E, Clayman R. Skin treatment and tract closure for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: University of California, Irvine, technique. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1739–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Uribe CA, Eichel L, Khonsari S, Finley DS, Basillote J, Park HK, et al. What happens to hemostatic agents in contact with urine? An in vitro study. J Endourol. 2005;19:312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kim IY, Eichel L, Edwards R, Uribe C, Chou DS, Abdelshehid C, et al. Effects of commonly used hemostatic agents on the porcine collecting system. J Endourol. 2007;21:652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Singh I, Saran RM, Jain M. Does sealing of the tract with absorbable gelatin (Spongostan) facilitate tubeless PCNL? A prospective study. J Endourol. 2008;22(11):2485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jou YC, Cheng MC, Sheen JH, Lin CT, Chen PC. Electocauterization of bleeding points for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2004;64(3):443–6. discussion 446–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C. “Tubeless” percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a series of 37 cases. Prog Urol. 2007;17(7):1351–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Aron M, Goel R, Kesarwani PK, Gupta NP. Hemostasis in tubeless PNL: point of technique. Urol Int. 2004;73(3):244–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Jo Semins M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Semins, M.J., Matlaga, B.R. (2013). Post-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Drainage. In: Nakada, S., Pearle, M. (eds) Surgical Management of Urolithiasis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6937-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6937-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6936-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6937-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics