Advertisement

PCNL: Supine Technique

  • Cesare Marco ScoffoneEmail author
  • Cecilia Maria Cracco
Chapter

Abstract

After more than 30 years, percutaneous stone removal still stands the test of time as treatment of choice for large and/or complex urolithiasis. In fact, instead of becoming obsolete over the decades, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) underwent considerable evolution thanks to a lot of technological advances in endoscopic instrumentation and fruitful innovations in surgical skills. The rather recent debate on patient positioning certainly contributed to the new life of PCNL. The introduction of the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) position optimally supports ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery), a novel combined antegrade and retrograde approach to the upper urinary tract for stone treatment, involving the synergic use of rigid and flexible endoscopes, of various accessories and of different lithotripsy energies, and a synergic cooperation among all the operators (two surgeons, anesthesiologist, scrub nurse, nurses, radiology technician) with the relative armamentaries. This technique implies many anesthesiological, management, and urological advantages. In particular, patient positioning, operating room organization, and the role of retrograde ureteroscopy are described.

Keywords

Ureteral Stone Stone Fragment Percutaneous Tract Retrograde Access Intrarenal Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Preminger GM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an extreme technical makeover for an old technique. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010;82(1):23–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Scarpa RM. New developments in percutaneous techniques for simple and complex branched renal stones. Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21(2):154–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miano R, Scoffone CM, De Nunzio C, Germani S, Cracco C, Usai P, et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2010;24(6):931–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. The patient position for PNL: does it matter? Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010;82(1):30–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Porpiglia F, Terrone C, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):233–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunter PT, Hawkins IF, Finlayson B, Nanni G, Senior D. Hawkins-Hunter retrograde transcutaneous nephrostomy: a new technique. Urology. 1983;22(6):583–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lawson RK, Murphy JB, Taylor AJ, Jacobs SC. Retrograde method for percutaneous access to the kidney. Urology. 1983;22(6):580–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehman T, Bagley DH. Reverse lithotomy: modified prone position for simultaneous nephroscopic and ureteroscopic procedures in women. Urology. 1988;32(6):529–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, Grande S, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daels F, González MS, Freire FG, Jurado A, Damia O. Percutaneous lithotripsy in Valdivia-Galdakao decubitus position: our experience. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1615–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoznek A, Rode J, Ouzaid I, Faraj B, Kimuli M, de la Taille, et al. Modifeid supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):164–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frattini A, Ferretti S, Dinale F, Salsi P, Granelli P, Campobasso D, Cortellini P. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in children: technical aspects. J Endourol Part B, Videourology. 2012;26(2): doi:10.1089/vid.2012.0001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cracco CM, Scoffone CM. ECIRS (Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery) in the Galdakao-modified Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery? World J Urol. 2011;29(6):821–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scoffone CM, Cracco CM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: opinion—supine position. In: Knoll T, Pearle MS, editors. Clinical management of urolithiasis. Springer: Heidelberg; 2013. p. 117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for high burden renal stones. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010;82(1):41–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyCottolengo Hospital of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations