Skip to main content

Future Directions And Research Needs For Source Zone Remediation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone Remediation

Part of the book series: SERDP ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology ((SERDP/ESTCP,volume 7))

  • 2002 Accesses

Abstract

Remediation of chlorinated solvent source zones remains extraordinarily challenging today and further advances will require the coordinated efforts of experts from a wide range of scientific disciplines including mathematics, chemistry, geology, hydraulics, geochemistry, microbiology and engineering. Research and development has played a vital role in improving site remediation efforts over the past 30 years and it will continue to be essential in the future. This chapter discusses research needs for both site characterization and remediation, as well as technology transfer needs. Many of the specific research needs identified in this chapter stem from discussions during Research and Development Needs meetings held in Washington, D.C. in 2010 and 2011, and subsequent written contributions.

Many of the specific research needs identified in this chapter stem from discussions during Research and Development Needs meetings held in Washington, D.C., in 2010 and 2011, and subsequent written contributions. A list of researchers and practitioners that participated in these meetings is provided in the Acknowledgement section at the end of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu LDV, Johnson PC. 2005. Effect of vapor source – building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model. Environ Sci Technol 39:4550–4561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adamson DT, McGuire TM, Newell CJ, Stroo H. 2010. Sustained treatment: Implications for treatment timescales associated with source-depletion technologies. Remediat J 21:27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu NB, Fure AD, Jawitz JW. 2008. Predicting dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution using a simplified source depletion model parameterized with partitioning tracers. Water Resour Res 44:W07414, doi:10.1029/2007WR006008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge ND, Ramsburg CA. 2009. Oil-in-water emulsions for encapsulated delivery of reactive iron particles. Environ Sci Technol 43:5060–5066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Res Policy 29:627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ JA, Ramsburg CA, Abriola LM, Pennell KD, Löffler FE. 2005. Coupling aggressive mass removal with microbial reductive dechlorination for remediation of DNAPL source zones – A review and assessment. Environ Health Perspect 113:465-477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christ JA, Ramsburg CA, Pennell KD, Abriola LM. 2010. Predicting DNAPL mass discharge from pool-dominated source zones. J Contam Hydrol 114:18–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falta RW, Rao PSC, Basu N. 2005. Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution. J Contam Hydrol 79:45–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friis AK, Albrechtsen H-J, Heron G, Berg PL. 2005. Redox processes and release of organic matter after thermal treatment of a TCE-contaminated aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 39:5787–5795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fure AD, Jawitz JW, Annable MD. 2006. DNAPL Source depletion: Linking architecture and flux response. J Contam Hydrol 85:118–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein KR, Vitolins AR, Navon D, Parker BL, Chapman S, Anderson GA. 2004. Characterization and pilot-scale studies for chemical oxidation remediation of fractured shale. Remediat J 14:19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrapovic L, Sleep BE, Major DJ, Hood ED. 2005. Laboratory study of treatment of trichloroethene by chemical oxidation followed by bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 39:2888–2897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2010. Use and Measurement of Mass Flux and Mass Discharge. ITRC, Washington, DC, USA. http://www.itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=49. Accessed January 20, 2014.

  • ITRC. 2011. Technical/Regulatory Guidance: Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy. ITRC, Washington, DC, USA. http://www.itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=35. Accessed January 20, 2014.

  • Jawitz JW, Fure AD, Demmy GG, Berglund S, Rao PSC. 2005. Groundwater contaminant flux reduction resulting from nonaqueous phase liquid mass reduction. Water Resour Res 41:W10408; doi:10.1029/2004WR003825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PC, Luo H, Holton C, Dahlen P, Guo Y. 2012. Interim Report: Integrated Field-Scale, Lab-Scale, and Modeling Studies for Improving the Ability to Assess the Groundwater to Indoor Air Pathway at Chlorinated Solvent-Impacted Groundwater Sites. SERDP ER-1686. SERDP, Alexandria, VA, USA. http://www.serdp.org/. Accessed January 20, 2014.

  • Johnson RL, Tratnyek PG, Johnson RO. 2009. Persulfate persistence under thermal activation conditions. Environ Sci Technol 42:9350–9356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston JL, Dahlen PR, Johnson PC. 2010. State-of-the-practice review of in situ thermal technologies. Ground Water Monit Remediat 30:64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis PK, McCarty PL, eds. 2013. Delivery and Mixing in the Subsurface: Processes and Design Principles for In Situ Remediation. In Ward CH, ed, SERDP/ESTCP Remediation Technology Monograph Series. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, NY, USA. 325 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Mori P, Kirkland E, Faircloth H, Bogert R, Kershner M. 2010. Combined thermal and zero-valent iron in situ soil mixing remediation technology. Remediat J 20:9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson A, Stroo H. 2011. Workshop Report: Investment Strategies to Optimize Research and Demonstration Impacts in Support of DoD Restoration Goals. SERDP, Alexandria, VA, USA. http://www.serdp.org/. Accessed January 20, 2014.

  • Lemke LD, Abriola LM, Lang JR. 2004. Influence of hydraulic property correlation on predicted dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone architecture, mass recovery and contaminant flux. Water Resour Res 40:W12417, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li KB, Abriola LM. 2009. A multistage multicriteria spatial sampling strategy for estimating contaminant mass discharge and its uncertainty. Water Resour Res 45:W06407, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell CJ, Cowie I, McGuire TM, McNab W. 2006. Multi-year temporal changes in chlorinated solvent concentrations at 23 MNA sites. J Environ Eng 132:653–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noblis. 2008. Tri-Services Handbook for the Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway. Falls Church, VA, USA. http://www.denix.osd.mil/references/upload/Tri-Serv_VI_Handbook_Final.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2014.

  • NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. 336 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC. 2005. Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. 372 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park E, Parker JC. 2008. Effects of mass reduction, flow reduction and enhanced biodecay of DNAPL source zones. Transp Porous Media 73:95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker BL, Gillham RW, Cherry JA. 1994. Diffusive disappearance of immiscible-phase organic liquids in fractured geologic media. Ground Water 32:805–820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peale JGD, Bakkom E, Lakhwala F, Mueller J, Molin J. 2008. TCE plume remediation via ISCR-enhanced bioremediation utilizing EHC® and KB-1®. Remediat J 18:19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phenrat T, Kim H-J, Fagerlund F, Illangasekare T, Tilton RD, Lowry GV. 2009. Particle size distribution, concentration, and magnetic attraction affect transport of polymer modified Fe0 nanoparticles in sand columns. Environ Sci Technol 43:5079–5085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn J, Geiger C, Clausen C, Brooks K, Coon C, O’Hara S, Krug T, Major D, Yoon W-S, Gavaskar A, Holdsworth T. 2005. Field demonstration of DNAPL dehalogenation using emulsified zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1309–1318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds DA, Kueper BH. 2001. Multiphase flow and transport in fractured clay/sand sequences. J Contam Hydrol 51:41–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwille F. 1981. Groundwater pollution in porous media by fluids immiscible with water. Sci Total Environ 21:173–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwille F. 1988. Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media. Translated by Pankow JF. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soga K, Page JWE, Illangasekare TH. 2004. A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach. J Hazard Mater 110:13–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stroo H, Ward CH, eds. 2010. In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, NY, USA. 786 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroo HF, Leeson A, Marqusee JA, Johnson PC, Ward CH, Kavanaugh MC, Sale TC, Newell CJ, Pennell KD, Lebrón CA, Unger M. 2012. Chlorinated ethene source remediation: Lessons learned. Environ Sci Technol 46:6438–6447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Truex MJ. Macbeth TW, Vermeul VR, Fritz BG, Mendoza DP, Mackley RD, Wietsma TW, Sandberg G, Powers T, Pitre E, Michalsen M, Ballock-Dixon SJ, Zhong L, Oostrom M. 2011. Demonstration of combined zero-valent iron and electrical resistance heating for in situ trichloroethene remediation. Environ Sci Technol 45:5346–5351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF). 2009. Sustainable remediation white paper: Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects. Remediat J 19:5–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB. 2000. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Sci 289:284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MR, Kueper BH. 2010. Plume detachment and recession times in fractured rock. Ground Water 48:416–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors of this chapter gratefully acknowledge the discussion, advice, counsel and recommendations of the researchers and practitioners who attended and contributed to meetings held in Washington, D.C., in December 2010 and December 2011. This chapter incorporates the discussions the authors had with the following experts: Linda Abriola, Tufts University; Michael Annable, University of Florida; Michael Basel, Haley & Aldrich; Richard Brown, ERM, Inc.; Natalie Cápiro, Tufts University; Michelle Crimi, Clarkson University; Rula Deeb, Geosyntec; Ron Falta, Clemson University; Rachel Farnum, General Electric (GE) Global Research; Mark Harkness, GE Global Research; Elisabeth Hawley, ARCADIS; Richard Johnson, Oregon Health and Science University; Michael Kavanaugh, Geosyntec; Brian Looney, U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River National Laboratory; Gregory Lowry, Carnegie Mellon University; David Major, Geosyntec; James Mercer, Tetra Tech GEO; Charles Newell, GSI Environmental; Fred Payne, ARCADIS; Kurt Pennell, Tufts University; Thomas Sale, Colorado State University; Robert Siegrist, Colorado School of Mines; Thomas Simpkin, CH2M Hill; Paul Tratnyek, Oregon Health and Science University; and A. Lynn Wood, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kueper, B.H., Shepard, A.J., Stroo, H.F., Vogel, C.M., Ward, C.H. (2014). Future Directions And Research Needs For Source Zone Remediation. In: Kueper, B., Stroo, H., Vogel, C., Ward, C. (eds) Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone Remediation. SERDP ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6922-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics