Skip to main content
  • 3312 Accesses

Abstract

The challenge of how to demonstrate that a manufacturing process change does not impact the safety (immunogenicity) and/or the efficacy (potency) of the biologic will be examined. The three major factors that drive the design of a comparability study will be stressed: (1) risk-based (major, moderate, and minor changes), (2) sequential (analytical, nonclinical, and clinical), and (3) clinical phase-appropriate (early-stage clinical vs. later-stage clinical development). The difference between a comparability study and a comparability protocol will be discussed. Finally, in this chapter, demonstrating biologic comparability after a process change both within a manufacturer’s operation (i.e., comparability pre-change vs. post-change product) and between two different manufacturers (i.e., biosimilarity) will be compared.

The best laid schemes of mice and men go often askew…

Robert Burns, Scottish poet, from his poem

“To a Mouse, On Turning Up Her Nest With a Plow” (1785)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Soliris (Eculizumab) (June 2007); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000791/WC500054212.pdf

  2. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Lucentis (Ranibizumab) (March 2007); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000715/WC500043550.pdf

  3. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Xigris (Activated Protein C) (November 2005); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000396/WC500058064.pdf

  4. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): MabThera (Rituxan) – Procedural Steps Taken and Scientific Information After Authorisation (June 2012); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Procedural_steps_taken_and_scientific_information_after_authorisation/human/000165/WC500025820.pdf

  5. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Orencia (Abatacept) – Procedural Steps Taken and Scientific Information After Authorisation (November 2012); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Procedural_steps_taken_and_scientific_information_after_authorisation/human/000701/WC500048940.pdf

  6. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  7. FDA Draft Guidance For Industry – Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product (February 2012); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf

  8. FDA Draft Guidance For Industry: Comparability Protocols – Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information (September 2003); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070545.pdf

  9. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  10. EMA Human Medicine Withdrawn Applications: Withdrawal Assessment Report For Cerepro (Sitimagene Ceradenovec), EMEA/CHMP/203243/2008 (2009); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Application_withdrawal_assessment_report/2010/01/WC500068119.pdf

  11. EMA Human Medicine Withdrawn Applications: Withdrawal Assessment Report For Cerepro (Sitimagene Ceradenovec), EMEA/CHMP/798830/2009 (2011); www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Application_withdrawal_assessment_report/2011/02/WC500101545.pdf

  12. EMA Guideline on the Requirements For Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials (March 2012); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/05/WC500127370.pdf

  13. FDA Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement and Criminal Investigations – Warning Letters: Warning Letter to Merck and Company (July 22, 2005): www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2005/ucm075495.htm

  14. EMA Draft Guideline on Comparability of Biotechnology-Derived Medicinal Products After a Change in the Manufacturing Process – Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues, EMEA/CHMP/BWP/101695/2006 (January 2007); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003937.pdf

  15. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  16. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) – Refusal Assessment Report: Gemesis (Becaplermin), EMA/CHMP/791565/2009 (November 2009); www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/000997/WC500091372.pdf

  17. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  18. EMA Human Medicines European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Abseamed (Epoetin Alfa) (September 2007); www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000727/WC500020666.pdf

  19. FDA Points to Consider in the Manufacture and Testing of Monoclonal Antibody Products For Human Use (February 1997); www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/OtherRecommendationsforManufacturers/UCM153182.pdf

  20. FDA Demonstration of Comparability of Human Biological Products, Including Therapeutic Biotechnology-Derived Products (April 1996); www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm122879.htm

  21. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  22. FDA Demonstration of Comparability of Human Biological Products, Including Therapeutic Biotechnology-Derived Products (April 1996); www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm122879.htm

  23. FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Briefing Package: Genzyme Corporation – Alglucosidase Alfa (September 2008); www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/briefing/2008-4389b1-04-Genzyme.pdf

  24. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  25. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  26. EMA Draft Guideline on Comparability of Biotechnology-Derived Medicinal Products After a Change in the Manufacturing Process – Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues, EMEA/CHMP/BWP/101695/2006 (January 2007); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003937.pdf

  27. B. Cherney (Deputy Director, FDA), Comparability of Biotechnology Derived Protein Products: Lessons From the U.S. Experience, presented at the WCBP 2010, 14th Symposium on the Interface of Regulatory and Analytical Sciences For Biotechnology Health Products (January 26, 2010); California Separation Science Society (CASSS) website, www.CASSS.org

  28. FDA Demonstration of Comparability of Human of Human Biological Products, Including Therapeutic Biotechnology-Derived Products (April 1996); www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm122879.htm

  29. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  30. FDA Guidance For Industry: Content and Format Of Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) For Phase 1 Studies of Drugs, Including Well-Characterized, Therapeutic, Biotechnology-Derived Products (November 1995); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM074980.pdf

  31. EMA Guideline on the Requirements For Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials (March 2012); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/05/WC500127370.pdf

  32. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  33. EMA Draft Guideline on Comparability of Biotechnology-Derived Medicinal Products After a Change in the Manufacturing Process – Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues, EMEA/CHMP/BWP/101695/2006 (January 2007); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003937.pdf

  34. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  35. FDA Guidance For Industry: IND Meetings For Human Drugs and Biologics – Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information (May 2001); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070568.pdf

  36. European Medicines Agency Guidance For Companies Requesting Scientific Advice and Procedural Assistance (May 2010); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2009/10/WC500004089.pdf

  37. FDA NDA Market Approval of Elelyso (Taliglucerase Alfa): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Other Action Letters – Complete Response Letter (February 24, 2011); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/022458Orig1s000OtherActionLtrs.pdf

  38. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) of Elelyso (Taliglucerase Alfa) (July 2012); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002250/WC500135112.pdf

  39. FDA BLA Market Approval of Raptiva (Efalizumab): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review (October 2003); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2003/125075_0000_Raptiva_BioPharmr.pdf

  40. FDA BLA Market Approval of Erbitux (Cetuximab): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Administrative and Correspondence Documents – Recommendation For Approval Action (February 12, 2004); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/bla/2004/125084_ERBITUX_ADMINCORRES.PDF

  41. FDA BLA Market Approval of Erbitux (Cetuximab): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Chemistry Review (January 2004); www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/bla/2004/125084_ERBITUX_CHEMR.PDF

  42. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report For Prolia (Denosumab) (March 2010); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/001120/WC500093529.pdf

  43. EMA Draft Guideline on Comparability of Biotechnology-Derived Medicinal Products After a Change in the Manufacturing Process – Non-Clinical and Clinical Issues, EMEA/CHMP/BWP/101695/2006 (January 2007); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003937.pdf

  44. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  45. FDA BLA Market Approval of Krystexxa (Pegloticase): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Administrative and Correspondence Documents – Type B CMC FDA Meeting (November 21, 2006); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2010/125293Orig1s000Admincorres.pdf

  46. FDA BLA Market Approval of Krystexxa (Pegloticase): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Other Action Letters – Complete Response (July 31, 2009); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2010/125293Orig1s000OtherActionLtrs.pdf

  47. ICH Q5E Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process (November 2004); www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5E/Step4/Q5E_Guideline.pdf

  48. EMA Reflection Paper on Design Modifications of Gene Therapy Medicinal Products During Development, EMA/CAT/GTWP/44236/2009 (December 2011); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/02/WC500122743.pdf

  49. EMA Guideline on Human Cell-Based Medicines, EMEA/CHMP/410869/2006 (May 2008); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003894.pdf

  50. FDA (Draft) Guidance For Industry: Comparability Protocols – Protein Drug Products and Biological Products – Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information (September 2003); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070262.pdf

  51. FDA (Draft) Guidance For Industry: Comparability Protocols – Protein Drug Products and Biological Products – Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information (September 2003); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM070262.pdf

  52. FDA BLA Market Approval of Benlysta (Belimumab): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Chemistry Review (November 17, 2010); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2011/125370Orig1s000ChemR.pdf

  53. FDA BLA Market Approval of Prevnar 13 (Pneumococcal 13-Valent Conjugate Vaccine (Diphtheria CRM197 Protein)): Licensed Biological Products With Supporting Documents – Market Approval Letter (February 24, 2010); CBER website, www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm201741.htm

  54. FDA BLA Market Approval of Fluzone (Influenza Virus Vaccine): Vaccines Licensed For Immunization and Distribution in the US With Supporting Documents – May 06, 2009 FDA Market Approval Letter; CBER website, www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm162018.htm

  55. FDA BLA Market Approval of Erwinaze (Asparaginase): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Administrative and Correspondence Documents Draft Responses I Comments- BLA 125359 EUSA Pharma and Erwinaze Meeting of August 5, 2011 to Discuss CMC Deficiencies; CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2011/125359Orig1s000AdminCorres.pdf

  56. FDA BLA Market Approval of Neutroval (Tbo-Filgrastim): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Administrative Documents and Correspondence – Followup CMC Information Request (August 10, 2010); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/125294Orig1s000Admincorres.pdf

  57. EMA Questions and Answers on Post Approval Change Management Protocols, EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/586330/2010 (March 2012); http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/04/WC500125400.pdf

  58. FDA Guidance For Industry (Draft): Quality Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Protein Product (February 2012); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291134.pdf

  59. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs) (2009); www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf

  60. EMA Guideline (Draft) on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active Substance: Quality Issues (Revision 1), EMA/CHMP/BWP/247713/2012 (May 2012); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/05/WC500127960.pdf

  61. FDA Guidance For Industry (Draft) Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product (February 2012); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf

  62. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs) (2009); www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf

  63. EMA Guideline (Draft) on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active Substance: Quality Issues (Revision 1), EMA/CHMP/BWP/247713/2012 (May 2012); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/05/WC500127960.pdf

  64. FDA Guidance For Industry (Draft): Quality Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Protein Product (February 2012); www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291134.pdf

  65. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs) (2009); www.who.int/biologicals/areas/biological_therapeutics/BIOTHERAPEUTICS_FOR_WEB_22APRIL2010.pdf

  66. EMA Guideline (Draft) on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Biotechnology-Derived Proteins as Active Substance: Quality Issues (Revision 1), EMA/CHMP/BWP/247713/2012 (May 2012); www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/05/WC500127960.pdf

  67. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) of Nivestim (Filgrastim) (June 2010); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/001142/WC500093664.pdf

  68. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) of Binocrit (Epoetin-Alfa) (September 2007); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000725/WC500053615.pdf

  69. EMA Human Medicine European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) of Valtropin (Somatropin) (May 2007); EMA website, www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000602/WC500047158.pdf

  70. EMA Human Medicine Withdrawal Applications: Withdrawal Assessment Report For Human Insulin Combimarv (February 2013); http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Application_withdrawal_assessment_report/2013/02/WC500138884.pdf

  71. EMA Human Medicine Refusal Assessment Report (EPAR): Alpheon (Interferon Alfa-2a) (October 2007); www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/000585/WC500070792.pdf

  72. FDA BLA Market Approval of Avonex (Interferon Beta-1a): Approval History, Letters, Reviews and Related Documents – Summary Basis For Approval (1996); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/ucm086056.pdf

  73. FDA BLA Market Approval of Avonex (Interferon Beta-1a): FDA-Approved Package Insert For Avonex (May 17, 1996); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/1996/ifnbbio051796lb.pdf

  74. FDA BLA Market Approval of Avonex (Interferon Beta-1a): FDA Approved Package Insert For Avonex (February 27, 2012); CDER, Drugs@FDA, website, www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/103628s5191lbl.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geigert, J. (2013). Demonstrating Product Comparability. In: The Challenge of CMC Regulatory Compliance for Biopharmaceuticals and Other Biologics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6916-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics