Skip to main content

Ethics and Biomedical Engineering Practice and Research: Origins of Principles and Consent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics for Biomedical Engineers

Abstract

Modern biomedical engineering practice relies heavily on the evidence base developed from trials, evaluations and audit studies of biomedical diagnostics and therapies. It is rare for a modern-day professional not to be exposed to such research and most accept the conduct of such an activity core to the profession. The basis of how we conduct studies both with and without human subject involvement is a well-developed and developing area. Principally, how we structure and conduct any study in this field is subject to ethical review. The subject of ethics arises from the philosophical basis of how we treat each other or, more generally, how we determine right from wrong behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anson G (1745) A voyage to the South Seas, and to many other parts of the world, from September 1740 to June 1744. Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish, MT

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (2005) Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45 Protection of Human Subjects. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Free C, Phillips G, Felix L, Galli L, Patel V, Edwards P (2010) The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol. BMC Res Notes 3:250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman B (1987) Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 317:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodin MA, Annas GJ (1996) Legacies of Nuremburg: medical ethics and human rights. JAMA 276:1682–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health Sciences Authority (HSA) (2011) [Internet] [Cited 20 Sep 2011]. http://www.hsa.gov.sg/

  • Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) (2011) IEEE EMBS Code of Ethics [Internet] [Cited 12 Dec 2011]. http://www.embs.org/docs/

  • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2012) [Internet] [Cited 11 Jul 2012]. http://www.iec.ch/

  • Kakuk P (2009) The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences. Sci Eng Ethics 15:545–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan AV, Baim DS, Smith JJ, Feigal DA, Simons M, Jefferys D, Fogarty TJ, Kuntz RE, Leon MB (2004) Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval. Circulation 109: 3068–3072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman LM (2000) Children as research subjects: a dilemma. J Med Philos 25:745–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loscalzo J (2009) Pilot trials in clinical research: of what value are they? Circulation 119: 1694–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council (2010) National Ethics Application Form (NEAF) version 2.0 [Internet] [Cited 12 Dec 2011]. www.neaf.gov.au

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-­Chancellors’ Committee (2007) National statement on ethical conduct of human research [Internet] [Cited 10 Dec 2011]. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au

  • Nuremburg Code (1947) In trials of war criminals before the Nuremburg military tribunals under control council law, Number 10, vol 2. US Government Printing Office 1949, Washington, DC, pp 181–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnic FS, Normand SL (2012) Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices – filling in the gaps. N Engl J Med 366:875–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2011) Inside clinical trials: testing medical products in people [Internet] [Cited 12 Dec 2011]. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143531.html

  • World Medical Organisation (1996) Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 313:1448–1449

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen J. Wilson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, S.J., Foo, J.Y.A. (2013). Ethics and Biomedical Engineering Practice and Research: Origins of Principles and Consent. In: Ethics for Biomedical Engineers. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6913-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics