Restore normal penile function
Restore normal genital appearance
Normal function includes forceful, straight urination without spraying or dribbling, straight erection, and normal ejaculation.
A vertical slit urethral meatus correctly positioned within the glans.
Circumcision or foreskin reconstruction.
A symmetric scrotum without transposition, midline cleft, or encroachment onto the penile shaft.
A secondary aim is to complete repair in as few stages with as few complications as possible.
Uroflowometry consistently demonstrates decreased Q max in patients after repair compared to nomograms. No study reports uroflows comparing patients and controls.
Adults repaired as children more often complain of obstructive voiding, spraying, and/or deviated stream than controls.
Ventral penile curvature (VC) occurs in approximately 10 % of distal and over 50 % of proximal hypospadias. Short-term studies indicate that dorsal plication and ventral lengthening used according to extent of curvature reliably achieve straightening.
Studies of dorsal plication done in adults with congenital curvature report persistence in <10 %.
The few surveys of adults operated as children find similar prevalences of penile curvature in patients and controls.
Ejaculation is more often reported by patients to have weak force with need to milk semen than controls.
Objective assessment of postoperative penile appearance indicates that tubularized incised plate (TIP) operation creates a more normal meatus and glans than flap procedures (Mathieu and onlay preputial flap). One study reported that parents of hypospadias patients scored outcomes after distal and proximal TIP similarly to parents of normal boys after circumcision.
Questionnaires of adults operated in childhood, sometimes by techniques no longer in use, find patients have less satisfaction with genital appearance than controls.
Distal hypospadias repair has short-term complication rates <10 %.
A reduction in proximal TIP complications from 53 to 13 % was reported in one study after a series of technical modifications.
Onlay and tubularized preputial flap proximal hypospadias repairs have complications of approximately 15–45 %.
There are few reported data for complications after various staged repairs.
Multiple logistic regression analyses find proximal meatal location and reoperation to be independent risk factors for complications, whereas suture materials and methods (interrupted vs. continuous) and stent or not (distal repair) did not impact outcomes.
Age at surgery >4 years was an independent risk factor in one study, but age was not a factor in two other analyses.
Most urethroplasty complications are diagnosed within 1 year of repair. Two studies of patients dismissed from childhood follow-up reported that 8 and 17 % had a complication when evaluated again as teens or adults.
KeywordsUrethral Stricture Hypospadias Repair Urethral Plate Meatal Location Meatal Stenosis
- AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics). Timing of elective surgery on the genitalia of male children with particular reference to the risks, benefits, and psychological effects of surgery and anesthesia. Pediatrics. 1996;97(4):590–4.Google Scholar
- Chuang JH, Shieh CS. Two-layer versus one-layer closure in transverse island flap repair of posterior hypospadias. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(5):739–42. Cox MJ, Coplen DE, Austin PF. The incidence of disorders of sexual differentiation and chromosomal abnormalities of cryptorchidism and hypospadias stratified by meatal location. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2649–52; discussion 52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dajusta D, Bush N, Snodgrass W. Glans penis width in patients with hypospadias compared to health controls. Boston, MA: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2011.Google Scholar
- El-Hout Y, Braga LH, Pippi Salle JL, Moore K, Bagli DJ, Lorenzo AJ. Assessment of urethral plate appearance through digital photography: do pediatric urologists agree in their visual impressions of the urethral plate in children with hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(3):294–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghanem MA, Nijman RJ. Outcome analysis of tubularized incised urethral plate using dorsal dartos flap for proximal penile hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;6(5):477–80.Google Scholar
- Gopal SC, Gangopadhyay AN, Mohan TV, Upadhyaya VD, Pandey A, Upadhyaya A, et al. Use of fibrin glue in preventing urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(10):1869–72. Granberg C, Bush N, Snodgrass W. Objective criteria for preoperative testosterone use before proximal hypospadias repair: evidence for androgen resistance. American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition; New Orleans, LA2012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaefer M, Diamond D, Hendren WH, Vemulapalli S, Bauer SB, Peters CA, et al. The incidence of intersexuality in children with cryptorchidism and hypospadias: stratification based on gonadal palpability and meatal position. J Urol. 1999;162(3 Pt 2):1003-6; discussion 6–7. Kajbafzadeh AM, Arshadi H, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, Najjaran-Tousi V, Sahebpor AR. Proximal hypospadias with severe chordee: single stage repair using corporeal tunica vaginalis free graft. J Urol. 2007;178(3 Pt 1):1036–42. discussion 42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McAleer IM, Kaplan GW. Is routine karyotyping necessary in the evaluation of hypospadias and cryptorchidism? J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt 1):2029–31; discussion 31–2. McLorie G, Joyner B, Herz D, McCallum J, Bagli D, Merguerian P, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate methods of postoperative care of hypospadias. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1669–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snodgrass W. Hypospadias. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 3503–36.Google Scholar
- Snodgrass W, Villanueva C, Bush N. Outcomes of reoperations for glans dehiscence in prepubertal boys with hypospadias. New Orleans, LA: American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition; 2012.Google Scholar
- Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP, Dott B. Genetic and environmental factors in hypospadias. J Med Genet. 1990;27(9):559–63. Thiounn N, Missirliu A, Zerbib M, Larrouy M, Dje K, Flam T, et al. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of penile curvature. Experience with 60 patients. Eur Urol. 1998;33(4):401–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallasciani S, Berrettini A, Nanni L, Manzoni G, Marrocco G. Observational retrospective study on acquired megalourethra after primary proximal hypospadias repair and its recurrence after tapering. J Pediatr Urol. 2012 in press; doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.05.005.
- Villanueva C, Bush N, Snodgrass W. Duration of follow-up to identify urethral complications after TIP hypospadias repair. New Orleans, LA: American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition; 2012.Google Scholar
- Yamaguchi T, Kitada S, Osada Y. Chromosomal anomalies in cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Urol Int. 1991;47(2):60–3. Yang S, Hsieh C, Chen Y, Chen S. Normal size of the urethral meatus in uncircumcised boys. J Urol ROC. 2001;12(1):20–3.Google Scholar