Introduction and Overview of Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care

Chapter

Abstract

The future vision for our health care system recognizes the importance of holistic patient care that stands firmly on a biopsychosocial foundation of prevention and primary care. Yet, weaving together the complex factors of biomedical and ­psychosocial systems, which have been long divided, is a perplexing and challenging enterprise. Even when policy makers, health care administrators, and clinicians have embraced the vision for wholistic health care, they often flounder in a web of diverse cultures, different languages, competing values, opposing structures, and conflicting resources. The purpose of this book is to organize the immense amount of ­information in this field, to provide a systematic analysis of the contributions and challenges of integrated care initiatives, and to develop a consumer’s report for ­stakeholders on the foundational components of integrated behavioral health in primary care.

Keywords

Depression Stake Glean 

References

  1. Addo, S. F., Maiden, K., & Ehrenthal, D. B. (2011). Awareness of the 5 A’s and motivational interviewing among community primary care providers. Delaware Medical Journal, 83(1), 17–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Babor, T. F., McRee, B. G., Kassebaum, P. A., Grimaldi, P. L., Ahmed, K., & Bray, J. (2007). Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Substance Abuse, 28(3), 7–30. doi: 10.1300/J465v28n03_03.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodenheimer, T., Wagner, E. H., & Grumbach, K. (2002). Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(15), 1909–1914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brody, D. S., Hahn, S. R., Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Linzer, M., deGruy, F. V., 3rd, et al. (1998). Identifying patients with depression in the primary care setting: a more efficient method. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(22), 2469–2475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doherty, W. J., McDaniel, S. H., & Baird, M. A. (1996). Five levels of primary care/behavioral healthcare collaboration. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 5(5), 25–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McDaniel, S. H., Campbell, T., & Seaburn, D. (1991). Treating somatic fixation: A biopsychosocial approach: When patients express emotions with physical symptoms. Canadian Family Physician, 37, 451–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Peek, C. J. (2011). A collaborative care lexicon for asking practice and research development questions. One of three papers in: a national agenda for research in collaborative care: papers from the collaborative care research network research development conference. Agency for healthcare research and quality, Rockville MD.  http://www.ahrq.gov/research/collaborativecare/.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Kroenke, K., Linzer, M., deGruy, F. V., 3rd, Hahn, S. R., et al. (1994). Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(22), 1749–1756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Von Korff, M., Gruman, J., Schaefer, J., Curry, S. J., & Wagner, E. H. (1997). Collaborative management of chronic illness. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(12), 1097–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wagner, E. H. (1997). Managed care and chronic illness: health services research needs. Health Services Research, 32(5), 702–714.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern Family Medicine Residency, Erie Family Health CenterChicagoUSA
  2. 2.NH Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency, Concord Hospital Family Health CenterConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations