Skip to main content

On the Temporal Dynamics of Influence on the Social Semantic Web

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Semantic Web and Web Science

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

The factors indicating influence on the social semantic web have been analysed in various approaches. We address the still open question of the temporal dynamics of these factors. We focus in particular on emerging, hot topics and the communities of microblog users around them. By training a model to predict the influence over several time segments we are able to analyse how the impact of 16 factors denoting influence develops over time. As datasets we employ a collection of microblog messages around two emerging new topics: the Egyptian revolution and the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn being accused for sexual assault. In conclusion we demonstrate that factors indicating influence are relatively stable—even in emerging communities. In particular the characteristics of an influential user remain stable, while the characteristics of the contents they publish are less constant. However, we also observe some minor differences in our two cases that can be explained by the context of the particular topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://twitter.com/.

  2. 2.

    In the preparation of this work we considered various other datasets, but had to discard them because they were either too small, did not cover a long enough time span or did not permit to extract the features we were interested in.

  3. 3.

    http://trec.nist.gov/data/tweets/.

  4. 4.

    http://dev.twitter.com/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.google.com/insights/search/.

  6. 6.

    Please note that performance of the fixed model is noted only from data segment 2 onwards. On the first segment it is equivalent to the local model.

References

  1. Angeletou, S., Rowe, M., Alani, H.: Modelling and analysis of user behaviour in online communities. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Semantic Web - Volume Part I, pp. 35–50. ISWC’11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2063016.2063020

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 65–74. WSDM ’11. ACM, New York, NY (2011), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1935826.1935845

  3. Bojars, U., Breslin, J.G., Peristeras, V., Tummarello, G., Decker, S.: Interlinking the social web with semantics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 23, 29–40 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Tech. rep., The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 10–17, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Che Alhadi, A., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., Naveed, N.: Livetweet: Monitoring and predicting interesting microblog posts. In: ECIR’12: Proceedings of the 34th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 569–570, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gottron, T., Lipka, N.: A comparison of language identification approaches on short, query-style texts. In: ECIR ’10: Proceedings of the 32nd European Conference on Information Retrieval, pp. 611–614, Mar 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, L., Dan, O., Davison, B.D.: Predicting popular messages in Twitter. In: Proc. Int. World Wide Web Conf., pp. 57–58, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proc. Int. World Wide Web Conf., pp. 591–600, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leavitt, A., Buchard, E., Fischer, D., Gilbert, S.: The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on Twitter, 2009, http://www.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/influence-report-final.pdf

  11. Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., Che Alhadi, A.: Bad news travel fast: A Content-based analysis of interestingness on twitter. In: WebSci ’11: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Science, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., Che Alhadi, A.: Searching microblogs: Coping with sparsity and document quality. In: CIKM’11: Proceedings of 20th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 183–188, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pickhardt, R., Gottron, T., Scherp, A., Staab, S., Kunze, J.: Efficient graph models for retrieving top-k news feeds from ego networks. In: SocialCom’12: Proceedings of ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romero, D.M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., Huberman, B.A.: Influence and passivity in social media. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 18–33, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowe, M., Angeletou, S., Alani, H.: Predicting discussions on the social semantic web. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6644, pp. 405–420. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Social Computing, pp. 177–184, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 63(1), 163–173 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21662

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., He, Q.: TwitterRank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 261–270, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received partial funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 257859, ROBUST and grant agreement no. 287975, SocialSensor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Gottron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gottron, T., Radcke, O., Pickhardt, R. (2013). On the Temporal Dynamics of Influence on the Social Semantic Web. In: Li, J., Qi, G., Zhao, D., Nejdl, W., Zheng, HT. (eds) Semantic Web and Web Science. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6880-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6880-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6879-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6880-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics