Skip to main content

Experimental and Finite Element Nonlinear Dynamics Analysis of Formula SAE Impact Attenuator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications 2

Abstract

Energy absorption and weight are major concerns in the design of an impact attenuator. To reduce the costs involved in the design and development of a new attenuator, it is important to minimise the time spent in the development and testing phase. The aim of this paper is to report on a study that used computer dynamic simulation to analyse the energy absorption and damage in a new impact attenuator. All initial requirements of the new attenuator were set in accordance with the 2011 Formula SAE rules. In this study, a nonlinear dynamic finite element was used to simulate an FSAE impact attenuator crash against a rigid barrier. Geometrical and material nonlinearities were performed using ABAQUS/Explicit commercial code. The numerical model was verified by experimental tests. Agreement between the numerical simulations and the test results showed that finite element analysis could be used effectively to predict the energy absorption and damage performance of an impact attenuator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. SAE International (2010) 2011 Formula SAE® Rules, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Askeland DR, Phule PP (2006) The science and engineering of materials, 5th edn. Thompson, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asano N (1981) Principle of virtual work for two elasto-impact bodies in separate state and its application to finite element method. Bull JSME 24:1123–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano N (1983) Virtual work principles for two elastoimpact contact bodies. Bull JSME 26:1687–1695

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wriggers P (2002) Computational contact mechanics. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang L, Rogers RJ (1988) Combined Lagrangian multiplier and penalty function finite element technique for elastic impact analysis. Comput Struct 30:1219–1229

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Vulovic S, Zivkovic M, Grujovic N, Slavkovic R (2007) A comparative study of contact problems solution based on the penalty and Lagrange multiplier approaches. J Serbian Soc Comput Mech 1:174–183

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weyler R, Oliver J, Sain T, Cante JC (2012) On the contact domain method: a comparison of penalty and Lagrange multiplier implementations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 205–208:68–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu SR (2009) A variational principle for dynamic contact with large deformation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2009–2015

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang F-J, Wang L-P, Cheng J-G, Yao Z-H (2007) Contact force algorithm in explicit transient analysis using finite-element method. Finite Elements Anal Design 43:580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dassault Systèmes (2010) Abaqus 6.10 theory manual. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi HH, Hwang SM, Kang YH, Kim J, Kang BS (2002) Comparison of implicit and explicit finite-element methods for the hydroforming process of an automobile lower arm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simulia Inc. (2010) ABAQUS/Explicit user’s manual. Version 6.10. Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmudi R (1997) Stress-state dependence of work-hardening behavior in aluminium alloy sheet. J Mater Process Technol 72:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Akbarpour MR, Ekrami A (2008) Effect of ferrite volume fraction on work hardening behavior of high bainite dual phase (DP) steels. Mater Sci Eng A 477:306–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Isaac Samuel E, Choudhary BK (2010) Universal scaling of work hardening parameters in type 316L(N) stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7457–7460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zare A, Ekrami A (2011) Effect of martensite volume fraction on work hardening behavior of triple phase (TP) steels. Mater Sci Eng A 528:4422–4426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This experiment and design were based on works supported by the RMIT University 2011 Formula SAE team. The authors would like to thank Daniel Tonini for his contribution in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toh Yen Pang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

List of Symbols

τ 1, τ 2

Time instant

δEα

Virtual kinetic force

δTα

Internal force

δWα

External forces

V

Volume occupied by a part of the body in the current configuration

S

The surface bounding in the volume

ρ

Material density

\( {f^{{({V_{\alpha }})}}} \)

Externally applied forces per unit volume

\( {f^{{(S_{\sigma}^{{(\alpha )}})}}} \)

Externally applied surface traction per unit surface area

σ

Cauchy stress tensor field

ε

Conjugate strain tensor

u

Displacement

ü

Accelerations

\( \bar{u} \)

Velocities

\( \delta \prod_{\alpha}^{cont } \)

Virtual contact work

δ

Arbitrary, virtual and compatible variation

\( \delta {{\bar{g}}_N} \)

Variation in gap

\( \delta {g_T} \)

Variation in tangential displacement

\( {g_N} \)

Gap

\( {g_T} \)

Relative displacement in a tangential direction

\( {{\bar{g}}_T} \)

Relative sliding velocity

\( {t_T} \)

Tangential stress vector

\( {t_N} \)

Contact force

τ crit

Threshold of tangential contact traction for tangential slip

\( {\upvarepsilon_N} \)

Penalty parameter

\( {{\bar{n}}^1} \)

Normal vector

\( {{\bar{x}}^1} \)

Deformation of the master surface

x 2

Deformation of the slave surface

\( {\rm S}_c^{(1) } \)

Master surface

\( S_c^{(2) } \)

Slave surface

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pang, T.Y., Tristian, H. (2014). Experimental and Finite Element Nonlinear Dynamics Analysis of Formula SAE Impact Attenuator. In: Jazar, R., Dai, L. (eds) Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6877-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6877-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6876-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6877-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics