Skip to main content

Beijing’s Museums in the Context of the 2008 Beijing Olympics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Heritage Politics in China
  • 2849 Accesses

Abstract

During the months prior to the 2008 Olympic Games, the Beijing Folk Customs Museum (located within a contested space from “Old Beijing” recently redefined as a working Daoist temple) saw temple caretakers and museum professionals reframe cultural phenomena as national cultural heritage. By implementing state directives to showcase “New Beijing,” a capital city blending modern civilization with traditional Chinese culture, both the temple and the museum could pursue distinct long-term goals. This chapter highlights dynamics of state-society relations at the local level, changing Chinese ethnographic museum practices, and complexities of identifying and preserving intangible and other forms of cultural heritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I find it ironic that just five years later, museums were closed as the Cultural Revolutionary campaign of “destroying the Four Olds” (posijiu 破四旧) meant attacking old ideas, old habits, old customs, and old culture. By 1976, all museums besides the Forbidden City had closed as a result of the Cultural Revolution. The 1980s saw more than 60 museums open or reopen in Beijing (Dong 2006). As a time for museum construction and restoration, 1976–1993 rivals the 2001–2008 Olympic run.

  2. 2.

    Though overseen by the State Administration of Cultural Heritage (SACH), their status as World Cultural Heritage symbolically removes them from the national and onto the global political-economic stage (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2006). In some ways this removal from national to international heritage may invite negligence in enforcing nationalistic messages and encourage individual co-optation of the space. Similar to what Kraus (2000) witnessed in Nanjing, for example, individuals gather in the Temple of Heaven’s park to perform and sell folk arts and crafts without permission from the Central government. I also found advertisements for a folk arts fair here, sponsored by Beijing City’s cultural bureau, even though technically the city government has no actual authority within a World Heritage Site.

  3. 3.

    The lack of monks has always made this branch of Daoism harder to control from a state regulatory standpoint. This may be part of the cause of its marginalization within the state-sponsored Daoist Association. The National Association has its headquarters at Baiyun Guan (白云馆), a monastery located on the other side of the city that houses adherents to quanzhen (全真) Daoism.

References

  • Ames, M. 1992. Museums in the age of deconstruction. In Cannibal Tours and Glass Boxes: The Anthropology of Museums, 2nd ed, ed. M. Ames, 151–168. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Folk Arts Museum. 2006. Lao Beijing de minjian huahui (Old Beijing’s popular cultural associations). Beijing Folk Arts Museum (Online). http://dongyuetemple.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=38%3Adym-arch&Itemid=56. Accessed 25 Nov 2007.

  • Beijing Folk Arts Museum. 2008. Dongyue Miao lishi zhan (Dongyue temple history exhibit). Beijing: Beijing Folk Arts Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games. 2001. Beijing Olympic action plan, official English version. Beijing (Online). http://www.beijing-2008.org/Olympic_new/english/features/planindex.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2006.

  • Broudehoux, A. 2004. The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Ministry of Culture. 2005. Bowuguan Guanli Banfa (Museum management methods). China Development Gateway. http://chinagate.cn/english/reports/48277.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2009.

  • China Ministry of Culture. 2006a. Protection of cultural heritage in China. China Development Gateway. http://en.chinagate.com.cn/reports/2006-08/18/content_2448279.htm. Accessed 4 Jan 2008.

  • China Ministry of Culture. 2006b. Protection of intangible cultural heritage in China. China Development Gateway. http://chinagate.cn/english/reports/48277.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2009.

  • China Ministry of Culture. 2008. Cultural institutions. China Culture Information Net (Online). http://english.ccnt.com.cn/?catog=culaws&file=030103&ads=service_001. Accessed 27 Feb 2010.

  • Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, K.A. 2005. Museums, memorial sites and exhibitionary culture in the People’s Republic of China. China Quarterly 18: 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J. 2006. Beijing Diqu jin bainian bowuguan fazhan gaishu (100 Years of museum development in the Beijing area: An outline) Beijing Wenbao. http://www.bjww.gov.cn/2006/4-6/174542.shtml. Accessed 10 Oct 2007.

  • du Plessis, J. 2005. The growing problem of forced evictions and the crucial importance of community-based, locally appropriate alternatives. Environment & Urbanization 17(1): 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erie, M. 2009. The hard case of the “Toughest Nail-House in History”: Property rights, legal consciousness, and the new media in China. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445293. Accessed 30 Dec 2009.

  • Gao, B.Z. 2006. An ethnography of a building both as museum and temple: On double-naming practices as the art of politics. Sociological Studies 21(1): 007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladney, D. 2004. Dislocating China: Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, X. 2004. Jian tan Minsu Bowuguan banguan silu (Thoughts on the Folk Arts Museum’s administration). Beijing Wenbao, July 7. http://www.bjww.gov.cn/2004/7-28/3155.shtml. Accessed 10 Oct 2008.

  • Hein, H.S. 2000. The Museum in Transition: A Philosophical Perspective. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 1995. Theorizing heritage. Ethnomusicology 39(3): 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 2006. World heritage and cultural economics. In Museum Frictions: Public Cultures/Global Transformations, ed. I. Karp, C.A. Kratz, L. Szwaja, and T. Ybarra-Frausto, 161–202. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, R. 2000. Public monuments and private pleasures in the parks of Nanjing: A tango in the ruins of The Ming Emperor’s palace. In The Consumer Revolution in Urban China, ed. D. Davis, 287–310. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, C.F. 2008. Appropriate museology in theory and practice. Museum Management and Curatorship 23(1): 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlantzick, J. 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberthal, K., and M. Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perin, C. 1992. The communicative circle: Museums as communities. In Museums and Communities: The Politics of Public Culture, ed. I. Karp, C.M. Kreamer, and S.D. Lavine, 183–220. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo, J.C. 2007. Brand China. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbridge, J.E., and G.J. Ashworth. 1996. Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. 1995. Palaces, museums, and squares: Chinese national spaces. Museum Anthropology 19(2): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., and D. Bell. 2005. Destroying the remembered and recovering the forgotten in China. China Information 19(3): 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis Ashton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashton, C. (2013). Beijing’s Museums in the Context of the 2008 Beijing Olympics . In: Blumenfield, T., Silverman, H. (eds) Cultural Heritage Politics in China. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6874-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics