Abstract
During the months prior to the 2008 Olympic Games, the Beijing Folk Customs Museum (located within a contested space from “Old Beijing” recently redefined as a working Daoist temple) saw temple caretakers and museum professionals reframe cultural phenomena as national cultural heritage. By implementing state directives to showcase “New Beijing,” a capital city blending modern civilization with traditional Chinese culture, both the temple and the museum could pursue distinct long-term goals. This chapter highlights dynamics of state-society relations at the local level, changing Chinese ethnographic museum practices, and complexities of identifying and preserving intangible and other forms of cultural heritage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I find it ironic that just five years later, museums were closed as the Cultural Revolutionary campaign of “destroying the Four Olds” (posijiu 破四旧) meant attacking old ideas, old habits, old customs, and old culture. By 1976, all museums besides the Forbidden City had closed as a result of the Cultural Revolution. The 1980s saw more than 60 museums open or reopen in Beijing (Dong 2006). As a time for museum construction and restoration, 1976–1993 rivals the 2001–2008 Olympic run.
- 2.
Though overseen by the State Administration of Cultural Heritage (SACH), their status as World Cultural Heritage symbolically removes them from the national and onto the global political-economic stage (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 2006). In some ways this removal from national to international heritage may invite negligence in enforcing nationalistic messages and encourage individual co-optation of the space. Similar to what Kraus (2000) witnessed in Nanjing, for example, individuals gather in the Temple of Heaven’s park to perform and sell folk arts and crafts without permission from the Central government. I also found advertisements for a folk arts fair here, sponsored by Beijing City’s cultural bureau, even though technically the city government has no actual authority within a World Heritage Site.
- 3.
The lack of monks has always made this branch of Daoism harder to control from a state regulatory standpoint. This may be part of the cause of its marginalization within the state-sponsored Daoist Association. The National Association has its headquarters at Baiyun Guan (白云馆), a monastery located on the other side of the city that houses adherents to quanzhen (全真) Daoism.
References
Ames, M. 1992. Museums in the age of deconstruction. In Cannibal Tours and Glass Boxes: The Anthropology of Museums, 2nd ed, ed. M. Ames, 151–168. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Beijing Folk Arts Museum. 2006. Lao Beijing de minjian huahui (Old Beijing’s popular cultural associations). Beijing Folk Arts Museum (Online). http://dongyuetemple.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=38%3Adym-arch&Itemid=56. Accessed 25 Nov 2007.
Beijing Folk Arts Museum. 2008. Dongyue Miao lishi zhan (Dongyue temple history exhibit). Beijing: Beijing Folk Arts Museum.
Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games. 2001. Beijing Olympic action plan, official English version. Beijing (Online). http://www.beijing-2008.org/Olympic_new/english/features/planindex.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2006.
Broudehoux, A. 2004. The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing. New York: Routledge.
China Ministry of Culture. 2005. Bowuguan Guanli Banfa (Museum management methods). China Development Gateway. http://chinagate.cn/english/reports/48277.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2009.
China Ministry of Culture. 2006a. Protection of cultural heritage in China. China Development Gateway. http://en.chinagate.com.cn/reports/2006-08/18/content_2448279.htm. Accessed 4 Jan 2008.
China Ministry of Culture. 2006b. Protection of intangible cultural heritage in China. China Development Gateway. http://chinagate.cn/english/reports/48277.htm. Accessed 10 Nov 2009.
China Ministry of Culture. 2008. Cultural institutions. China Culture Information Net (Online). http://english.ccnt.com.cn/?catog=culaws&file=030103&ads=service_001. Accessed 27 Feb 2010.
Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Denton, K.A. 2005. Museums, memorial sites and exhibitionary culture in the People’s Republic of China. China Quarterly 18: 565–586.
Dong, J. 2006. Beijing Diqu jin bainian bowuguan fazhan gaishu (100 Years of museum development in the Beijing area: An outline) Beijing Wenbao. http://www.bjww.gov.cn/2006/4-6/174542.shtml. Accessed 10 Oct 2007.
du Plessis, J. 2005. The growing problem of forced evictions and the crucial importance of community-based, locally appropriate alternatives. Environment & Urbanization 17(1): 123–134.
Erie, M. 2009. The hard case of the “Toughest Nail-House in History”: Property rights, legal consciousness, and the new media in China. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445293. Accessed 30 Dec 2009.
Gao, B.Z. 2006. An ethnography of a building both as museum and temple: On double-naming practices as the art of politics. Sociological Studies 21(1): 007.
Gladney, D. 2004. Dislocating China: Muslims, Minorities, and Other Subaltern Subjects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Han, X. 2004. Jian tan Minsu Bowuguan banguan silu (Thoughts on the Folk Arts Museum’s administration). Beijing Wenbao, July 7. http://www.bjww.gov.cn/2004/7-28/3155.shtml. Accessed 10 Oct 2008.
Hein, H.S. 2000. The Museum in Transition: A Philosophical Perspective. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 1995. Theorizing heritage. Ethnomusicology 39(3): 367–380.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 2006. World heritage and cultural economics. In Museum Frictions: Public Cultures/Global Transformations, ed. I. Karp, C.A. Kratz, L. Szwaja, and T. Ybarra-Frausto, 161–202. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kraus, R. 2000. Public monuments and private pleasures in the parks of Nanjing: A tango in the ruins of The Ming Emperor’s palace. In The Consumer Revolution in Urban China, ed. D. Davis, 287–310. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kreps, C.F. 2008. Appropriate museology in theory and practice. Museum Management and Curatorship 23(1): 23–41.
Kurlantzick, J. 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lieberthal, K., and M. Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Perin, C. 1992. The communicative circle: Museums as communities. In Museums and Communities: The Politics of Public Culture, ed. I. Karp, C.M. Kreamer, and S.D. Lavine, 183–220. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Ramo, J.C. 2007. Brand China. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.
Turnbridge, J.E., and G.J. Ashworth. 1996. Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. New York: Wiley.
Watson, R. 1995. Palaces, museums, and squares: Chinese national spaces. Museum Anthropology 19(2): 7–19.
Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zhao, X., and D. Bell. 2005. Destroying the remembered and recovering the forgotten in China. China Information 19(3): 489–503.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ashton, C. (2013). Beijing’s Museums in the Context of the 2008 Beijing Olympics . In: Blumenfield, T., Silverman, H. (eds) Cultural Heritage Politics in China. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6874-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6874-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6873-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6874-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)