Abstract
Temporal self-regulation theory (TST) is an integrative model of individual health behavior that retains features of familiar social-cognitive models, but extends them to include neurobiological control resources and consideration of temporal factors in behavioral contingencies introduced by the ecological context in which the behavior occurs. The TST model posits that the intention-behavior link is subject to modification by executive control resources (i.e., inhibition, working memory, and attentional set shifting) and behavioral prepotency (i.e., habit strength, visceral appeal, or “default” status of the behavior). Intention itself is posited to be determined by the balance of costs and benefits of the behavior within a time-sensitive context, such that immediate factors are disproportionately influential. The TST model is intended to explain health protective behaviors, health risk behaviors, and single-occurrence choice behaviors that have relevance for health and wellbeing. Several links in the model are already supported by decades of research in behavioral economics, decision theory, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. In this chapter, we introduce the TST model, describe its linkages to each of these research disciplines, and provide recommendations for how it can guide intervention strategy in the field of public health.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J. (2009a). The role of time perspective in smoking cessation amongst older english adults. Health Psychology, 28, 529–534.
Adams, J. (2009b). Time for a change of perspective on behavior change interventions? Addiction, 104, 1025–1026.
Adams, J., & Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 83–105.
Adams, J., & White, M. (2009). Time perspective in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and body mass index. Health Psychology, 28, 83–90.
Ainslie, G. (2013). Picoeconomics in neural and evolutionary contexts. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
Barral, S., Cosentino, S., Costa, R., Matteini, A., Christensen, K., Andersen, S. L., et al. (2012). Cognitive function in families with exceptional survival. Neurobiology of Aging, 33(619), e1–e7.
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.
Becker, B. W., Thames, A. D., Woo, E., Castellon, S. A., & Hinkin, C. H. (2011). Longitudinal change in cognitive function and medication adherence in HIV-infected adults. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 1888–1894.
Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cascio, C., Dal Cin, S., & Falk, E. (2013). Health communications: Predicting behavior change from the brain. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
Duff, K., Mold, J. W., & Gidron, Y. (2009). Cognitive functioning predicts survival in the elderly. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 90–95.
Ettenhofer Mark, L., Foley, J., Castellon, S. A., & Hinkin, C. H. (2010). Reciprocal prediction of medication adherence and neurocognition in HIV/AIDS. Neurology, 74(15), 1217–1222.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Fregni, F., Orsati, F., Pedrosa, W., Fecteau, S., Tome, F. A. M., Nitsche, M. A., et al. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates the desire for specific foods. Appetite, 51, 34–41.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225.
Gallo, I.S., Cohen, A.L., Gollwitzer, P.M. & Oettingen, G. (2013). Neurophysiological correlates of the self-regulation of goal pursuit. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
Gerard, G., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Lenworthy, L. (2000). Test review: Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychology, 6, 235–238.
Hall, P. A. (2012). Executive control resources and frequency of fatty food consumption: Findings from an age-stratified community sample. Health Psychology, 31, 235–241.
Hall, P. A., & Epp, L. (2013). Does domain-specific time perspective predict accelerometer assessed physical activity? An examination of ecological moderators. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 52–58.
Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2003). The effects of a brief time perspective intervention for increasing physical activity among young adults. Psychology and Health, 18, 685–706.
Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2007). Temporal self-regulation theory: A model for individual health behavior. Health Psychology Review, 1, 6–52.
Hall, P.A., & Fong, G.T. (2013). Conscientiousness versus executive function as predictors of health behaviors and health trajectories. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9466-2.
Hall, P. A., Elias, L. J., & Crossley, M. (2006). Neurocognitive influences on health behaviour in a community sample. Health Psychology, 25, 778–782.
Hall, P. A., Fong, G. T., Epp, L. J., & Elias, L. (2008). Executive function moderates the intention-behavior link for physical activity and dietary behavior. Psychology and Health, 23, 309–326.
Hall, P. A., Dubin, J., Crossley, M., Holmqvist, M., & D’Arcy, C. (2009). Does executive function explain the IQ-mortality association? Evidence from the Canadian study on health and aging. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 196–204.
Hall, P. A., Crossley, M., & D’Arcy, C. (2010). Executive function and survival in the context of chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 119–127.
Hall, P.A., Fong, G.T., & Cheng, A. (2012a). Time perspective and weight management behaviors in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: A mediational analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,. doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9389-6
Hall, P. A., Fong, G. T., Yong, H. H., Sansone, G., Borland, R., & Siahpush, M. (2012b). Addictive behaviors do time perspective and sensation-seeking predict quitting activity among smokers? findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 1307–1313.
Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., & Maisto, S. A. (2006). Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: Model testing with boot-strapping replication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 127–137.
Hinkin, C. H., Castellon, S. A., Durvasula, R. S., Hardy, D. J., Lam, M. N., Mason, K. I., et al. (2002). Medication adherence among HIV+ adults: Effects of cognitive dysfunction and regimen complexity. Neurology, 59, 1944–1950.
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychology Review, 2, 111–137.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180.
Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2011). Training inhibitory control: A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite, 56, 345–349.
Humes, G. E., Welsh, M. C., Retzlaff, P., & Cookson, N. (1997). Towers of Hanoi and London: Reliability and validity of two executive function tests. Assessment, 4, 249–257.
Insel, K., Morrow, D., Brewer, B., & Figueiredo, A. (2006). Executive function, working memory, and medication adherence among older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 61B, P102–P107.
Jasinska, A. J., Yasuda, M., Burant, C. F., Gregor, N., Khatri, S., Sweet, M., et al. (2012). Impulsivity and inhibitory control deficits are associated with unhealthy eating in young adults. Appetite, 59, 738–747.
Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164.
Kimberg, D. Y., & Farah, M. J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 411–428.
Langleblen, D. D., et al. (2009). Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads. Neuroimage, 46, 219–225.
Liu-Ambrose, T., & Nagamatsu, L.S. (2013). Resistance training and cognitive and cortical plasticity in older adults. Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lowe, C., & Hall, P.A. (2013). Neurobiological facets of food craving and consumption: Evidence from neuropsychological and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
McAuley, E., Mullen, S.P. & Hillman, C. (2013). Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cognition across the lifespan. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York, NY.
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933–938.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions : Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
Nederkoorn, C., Houben, K., Hofmann, W., Roefs, A., & Jansen, A. (2010). Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and preference for high fat foods. Health Psychology, 29, 389–393.
Panos, S.E., Patel, S., Thames, A.D., & Hinkin, C.H. (2013). Neurocognition and medication adherence in HIV infected adults. In P.Hall (Ed.), Social neuroscience and public health: Foundations for the science of chronic disease prevention. Springer: New York.
Pepin, J. (2011). The origins of AIDS. London: Cambridge Press.
Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15, 131–134.
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1313–1330.
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249–268.
Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., & Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress–coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 118–125.
Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit–goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843–863.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Highlights
-
Temporal self-regulation theory (TST) is a model of individual health behavior that incorporates cognitive resources and ecological factors.
-
TST posits that intention is a proximal predictor of behavior, but its influence is modulated by executive control resources and behavioral prepotency.
-
Temporal proximity of behavioral contingencies determines the need for self-regulatory resources, and the relative influence of prepotency.
-
In accordance with TST, public health initiatives will stand the best chance of success if they accomplish the following: support prepotency through strategic behavior cueing, encourage optimization of cognitive control resources, and systematically engineer social and physical environments to support desired behaviors.
Appendix A
Time Perspective Questionnaire-Alcohol Version (TPQ-A)
Consider each of the statements below. For each, indicate your level of agreement or disagreement by using the following scale.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Disagree very strongly | Disagree strongly | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Agree strongly | Agree very strongly |
1. | Long-term sobriety is at least as important to me as the immediate pleasures of having a drink (e.g., getting a “buzz”, relaxation) |
2. | I do not spend much time thinking about my long-term sobriety plans |
3. | I have a good sense of how I can cut down my drinking now and in the future |
4. | I spend a great deal of time thinking about how my present drinking habits will affect my life later on |
5. | I never consider the long-term consequences of drinking when I decide to have a drink |
6. | I do not have long-term sobriety plans |
Appendix B
Time Perspective Questionnaire-Smoking Version (TPQ-S)
Consider each of the statements below. For each, indicate your level of agreement or disagreement by using the following scale.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Disagree very strongly | Disagree strongly | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Agree strongly | Agree very strongly |
1. | Long-term quitting plans are at least as important to me as the immediate benefits of smoking (e.g., reduced craving, relaxation) |
2. | I do not spend much time thinking about my long-term quitting plans |
3. | I have a good sense of how I can cut down my smoking now and in the future |
4. | I spend a great deal of time thinking about how my present smoking habits will affect my life later on |
5. | I never consider the long-term consequences of smoking when I light up |
6. | I do not have a long-term quit plan for smoking |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, P.A., Fong, G.T. (2013). Temporal Self-Regulation Theory: Integrating Biological, Psychological, and Ecological Determinants of Health Behavior Performance. In: Hall, P. (eds) Social Neuroscience and Public Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6851-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6852-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)