“We’re All in the Same Boat:” Potentials and Tensions When Learning Through Sharing Uncertainty in Peer Supervision Groups

Chapter

Abstract

Charlotte Tulinius presents some of the challenges of peer supervision groups in Denmark. In providing examples of how groups work, she illustrates core principles across different methods, including the application of reflexivity in the context of a patient-centred approach. Dr. Tulinius explores the cultural conditions and perceptions of GP professionalism that support the development and maintenance of peer supervision groups such as the concept of ‘sameness’. Her focus on the different ways groups are supervised provides insight into how groups can vary in their gain from participating in peer support groups. To illustrate some of the differences, she presents results from a study following three peer supervision groups over time. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the challenges in designing groups for sharing of uncertainty in ways possibly unique to Denmark but indeed relevant to anyone who wants to set up professional development based on uncertainty engagement methods.

Keywords

Fatigue Obesity Income Expense Metaphor 

References

  1. Andersen, T. (1996). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baarts, C., Tulinius, C., & Reventlow, S. (2000). Reflexivity – A strategy for a patient-centred approach in general practice. Family Practice, 17, 430–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balint, M. (2000). The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  4. Bendix, T. (1957). Din nervøse patient. [Your nervous patient]. Copenhagen: Lægeforeningens forlag.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, K. (2011). Taking sameness for granted through the Nordic worker-carer model. Thinking Gender Papers. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Women.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, M. M. (2007). Private practice psychologists’ use of peer supervision groups and experiences of compassion fatigue, burnout and compassion satisfaction. Dissertation. Chicago: Loyola University.Google Scholar
  7. Cruess, S. R. (2006). Professionalism and medicine’s social contract with society. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 449, 170–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Figley, R. C. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. Psychotherapy in Practice, 58, 1433–1441.Google Scholar
  9. Fink, P., Rosendal, M., & Toft, T. (2002). Assessment and treatment of functional disorders in general practice: The extended reattribution and management model–an advanced educational program for nonpsychiatric doctors. Psychosomatics, 43, 93–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Firth-Cozens, J. (2001). Interventions to improve physicians’ well-being and patient care. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fish, D., & Coles, C. (1998). Developing professional judgement in health care. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, N. (1999). Postmodern reflections on ‘risk’, ‘hazards’ and ‘life choices’. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 12–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hastrup, K. (1990). The ethnographic present: A reinvention. Cultural Anthropology, 5, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helman, C. (2006). The suburban shaman, tales from medicine’s front line. London: Hammersmith Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hervik, P. (1994). Shared reasoning in the field: Reflexivity beyond the author. In K. Hastrup & P. Hervik (Eds.), Social experience and anthropological knowledge (pp. 60–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hervik, P. (1999). Den Generende Forskellighed – danske svar på den stigende multikulturalisme. [The annoying otherness: The Danish response to an increasing multi-cultural society]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  17. Hølge-Hazelton, B., & Tulinius, C. (2010). Beyond the specific child. What is a ‘child case’ in general practice? The British Journal of General Practice, 60, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hølge-Hazelton B., & Tulinius C. (2012) Individual development of professionalism. A multiple case study of GPs in group supervision. International Journal of Family medicine 2012, 13. Article ID 792018, doi:10.1155/2012/792018, can be accessed freely at http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijfm/2012/792018/. last 17th March 2013.
  19. Jarvis, P. (2002). Practice-based and problem-based learning. In P. Jarvis (Ed.), The theory of practice of teaching (pp. 123–131). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  20. Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning: Lifelong learning and the learning society (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kjær, N. K., & Tulinius, C. (2004). Learning in general practice in Denmark: Trainees’ and trainers’ perspectives. Masters thesis. Maastricht: MHPE, Maastricht University.Google Scholar
  22. Kjeldmand, D. (2006). The doctor, the task and the group: Balint groups as a means of developing new understanding in the physician-patient relationship. Ph.D. thesis. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  23. Malterud, K. (1988). Veien blir til mens du går [The path is made as you walk it]. In G. Almind, D. Bruusgaard, N. Bentzen, B. Hovelius (Eds.), Forskning i nordisk allmennmedisin [Research in Nordic general practice] (pp.169–176). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  24. Nielsen, H. G., & Söderström, M. (2012). Group supervision in general practice as part of continuing professional development. Danish Medical Journal, 59(2):A4350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, H. G., & Tulinius, C. (2009). Preventing burn-out among GPs – Is there a possible route? Education for Primary Care, 20, 353–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Dowd, T. (1988). Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. British Medical Journal, 297, 528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Report of the Royal Commission on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration. (1960). Evidence of Lord Moran of Manton. The Journal of the College of General Practitioners, 3, 133–134.Google Scholar
  28. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. (1996) Skills for the new millennium: Report of the societal needs working group – CanMEDS 2000 project. Annals Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 29, 206–216.Google Scholar
  29. Saltiel, D. (2010). Judgement, narrative and discourse, a critique of reflective practice. In H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster, & M. Zukas (Eds.), Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Soler, J. K., Yaman, H., Esteva, M., et al. (2008). Burnout in European family doctors: The EGPRN Study. Family Practice, 25, 245–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  33. Stenhouse, L. (1967). Culture and education. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare: Making knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tulinius, C., & Dencker, A. (2001) Patienterne ville jo tro, at jeg var monoman, hvis jeg tog rygning op hver eneste gang.. [The patients would think I was suffering from monomania if I talked about smoking in every encounter…] A study of GPs’ attitudes, work and expectations for the work as life style advisers. Copenhagen: Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  36. Tulinius, C., & Hølge-Hazelton, B. (2010). Continuing professional development for general practitioners: Supporting the development of professionalism. Medical Education, 44, 412–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vedsted, P., Olesen, F., Hollnagel, H., et al. (2005). Almen laegepraksis I Danmark [General practice in Denmark]. Copenhagen: Maanedsskrift for almen praksis.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Research Unit and Department of General Practice and Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.St. Edmund’s College, Cambridge UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations