Advertisement

Biofabrication: Main Advances and Challenges

  • Andrés Díaz Lantada
Chapter

Abstract

The artificial production, in laboratories, of organs and biological structures, by adequately placing and combining ex vivo cells, synthetically produced tissue patches, and supporting biomaterials, is no more a matter of science fiction but a present relevant research challenge already providing promising results, included under an innovative area called “biofabrication.”

If organs could be artificially produced, patients would benefit from more rapid surgical interventions; compatibility would be highly promoted, as they would be produced ex vivo from the own patient’s cells; and aspects such as organ piracy would be limited (nowadays around 10 % of organs used for transplantation worldwide comes from illegal activities).

The socio-economical impact of synthetic organ production is comparable to that of the whole pharmaceutical industry, what explains the interest it has arisen in the last decade, with several new companies aiming at improving state-of-the-art tissue engineering procedures for starting 3D tissue construction.

In addition, novel scientific journals are being devoted to these advances, and it is just a matter of time that related concepts and techniques are included in the syllabuses of teaching programs at universities, what would be very positive for the evolution of this area.

This chapter provides a brief introduction to this field of research, discussing most relevant advances on materials science, design tools, and manufacturing technologies that are working for making biofabrication a viable alternative to conventional therapeutic procedures. Main present difficulties and research challenges are also discussed.

Keywords

Additive Manufacture Spider Silk Medical Imaging Technology Rapid Prototype Machine Cell Printer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barthlott, W., Neinhuis, C.: Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202, 1–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolo, P.J.S., Almeida, H., Laoui, T.: Rapid prototyping and manufacturing for tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 36(1), 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Bartolo, P.J.S., Bidanda, B.: Biomaterials and Prototyping Applications in Medicine. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benyus, J.M.: Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. Harper Collins, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Díaz Lantada, A., Lafont Morgado, P., Echávarri Otero, J., Chacón Tanarro, E., De la Guerra Ochoa, E., Munoz-Guijosa, J.M., Muñoz Sanz, J.L.: Biomimetic computer-aided design and manufacturing of complex biological surfaces. In: Biodevices 2012 – International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices. IEEE-EMBS, Vilamoura (2012)Google Scholar
  6. De la Guerra Ochoa, E., Del Sordo Carrancio, D., Echávarri Otero, J., Chacón Tanarro, E., Díaz Lantada, A., Lafont Morgado, P.: The influence of textured surfaces on the lubrication of artificial joint prostheses. In: Biodevices 2012 – International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices. IEEE-EMBS, Vilamoura (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Gómez Ribelles, J.L., Monleón Pradas, M., García Gómez, R., Forriol, F., Sancho-Tello, M., Carda, C.: The role of three-dimensional scaffolds in the regeneration of joint cartilage. In: Biodevices 2010 – International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices: Special Session on Rapid Prototyping for Improving the Development of Biodevices. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Valencia (2010), 20–23 Jan 2010Google Scholar
  8. Guo, X., Liu, X., Zhang, B., Hu, G., Bai, J., et al.: A combined fluorescence and microcomputer tomography system for small animal testing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 2876–2883 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Hollister, S.J.: Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 4, 518–524 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakab, K., Norotte, C., Marga, F., Murphy, K., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Forgacs, G., et al.: Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication 2, 022001 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanani, C.: Cell printing: a novel method to seed cells onto biological scaffolds. Ph.D. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2012)Google Scholar
  12. Langer, R.S., Vacanti, J.P.: Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lenaghan, S.C., Serpersu, K., Xia, L., He, W., Zhang, M., et al.: A naturally occurring nanomaterial from the Sundew (Drosera) for tissue engineering. Bioinspir. Biomim. 6, 0460009 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, S.J., Xiong, Z., Wang, X.H., Yan, Y.N., Liu, X.H., Zhang, R.J., et al.: Direct fabrication of a hybrid cell/hydrogel construct by a double-nozzle assembling technology. J. Bioact. Biocompatible Pol. 24, 249–265 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marga, F., Jakab, F., Khatiwala, C., Shepherd, B., Dorfman, S., Hubbard, B., Colbert, S., Gabor, F., et al.: Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication 4, 022001 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melchels, F.P.W., Domingos, M.A.N., Klein, T.J., Malda, J., Bartolo, P.J., Hutmacher, D.W.: Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog. Polym. Sci. (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
  17. Mironov, V., Trusk, T., Kasyanov, V., Little, S., Swaja, R., Markwald, R., et al.: Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigm. Biofabrication 1(2), 022001 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norotte, C., Marga, F.S., Niklason, L.E., Forgacs, G., et al.: Scaffold free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30, 5910–5917 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ovsianikov, A., Gruene, M., Pflaum, M., Koch, L., Maiorana, F., Wilhelmi, M., Haverich, A., Chichkov, B., et al.: Laser printing of cells into 3D scaffolds. Biofabrication 2, 014104 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi, H., Farag, A.A., Fahmi, R., Chen, D.: Validation of finite element models of liver tissue using micro-CT. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55, 978–985 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Some Interesting Related Websites

  1. http://reprap.org/wiki/RepRap. Accessed Mar 2013
  2. http://www.digilabglobal.com. Accessed Mar 2013
  3. http://www.envisiontec.de. Accessed Mar 2013
  4. http://www.fractal-bio.com. Accessed Mar 2013
  5. http://www.skyscan.be. Accessed Mar 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department – Product Development LaboratoryUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations