The Design of Manufacturing Systems to Cope with Variability

Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 192)


Manufacturing systems have to be able to cope with variability, such as job variety, machine failures and repair, operation time variability and the variability between workers. The chapter shows how models can be used to support the design of systems that cope with variability. In job shops variability leads to high inventories. Only with highly variable operation times does random routing of jobs improve performance, otherwise uniform routing is preferable. Scheduling jobs based on their operation times improves performance. While flow lines can offer improved productivity, quality problems occur in moving belt systems, and with limited storage space for in process jobs productivity is reduced. FMS were developed to overcome job shop and flow line problems. Models are used to show why FMS have not met their initial promise. Central storage of in process jobs uses limited storage space better. Cells and teams should achieve substantial productivity improvement, but only if there are incentives for faster workers do more work.


Flow Line Flexible Manufacture System Work Center Material Handling System Assembly Line Balance Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to acknowledge the contribution to my understanding of manufacturing systems by Bill Brady and Leo Hanifin and by my former PhD students John Callahan, George Shanthikumar, David Yao, Ken McKay, Beth Jewkes, Diwakar Gupta, Seyed Iravani, Xiao-Gao Liu.


  1. 1.
    Bartholdi, J. J. III, & Eisenstein, D. D. (1996). A production line that balances itself. Operations Research, 44, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buzacott, J. A. (1967). Automatic transfer lines with buffer stocks. International Journal of Production Research, 5, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buzacott, J. A. (1971). The role of inventory in flow-line production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 9, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buzacott, J. A. (1990). Abandoning the moving assembly line: Models of human operators and job sequencing. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 821–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzacott, J. A. (1996). Commonalities in reengineered business processes: Models and issues. Management Science, 42, 768–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buzacott, J. A. (1999). The structure of manufacturing systems: Insights on the impact of variability. International Journal of FMS, 11, 127–146.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buzacott, J. A. (2002). The impact of worker differences on production system output. International Journal of Production Economics, 78, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buzacott, J. A. (2003). The evolution of manufacturing systems models: A personal view. In J. G. Shanthikumar, D. D. Yao, & W. H. Zijm (Eds.), Stochastic modeling and optimization of manufacturing systems and supply chains (pp. 21–52). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buzacott, J. A. (2004). Modelling teams and workgroups in manufacturing. Annals of Operations Research, 126, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buzacott, J. A. (2007). Production system design for mass customization—Insights from the fast food industry. In H. Corsten, & H. Missbauer (Eds.), Produktions und Logistikmanagement (pp. 349–369). Munich: Verlag Franz Vahlen.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1980). Models for understanding flexible manufacturing systems. AIIE Transactions, 12, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1985). On approximate queueing models of dynamic job shops. Management Science, 31, 870–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (1993). Stochastic models of manufacturing systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buzacott, J. A., Shanthikumar, J. G., & Yao, D. D. (1994). Jackson network models of manufacturing systems. In D. D. Yao (Ed.), Stochastic models and analysis of manufacturing systems (pp. 1–45). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buzacott, J. A., & Yao, D. D. W. (1986). Flexible manufacturing systems: A review of analytical models. Management Science, 32, 890–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dudley, N. A. (1968). Work measurement: Some research studies. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Judiesch, M. K. (1990). Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jackson, J. R. (1957). Networks of waiting lines. Operations Research, 5, 518–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shanthikumar, J. G., & Buzacott, J. A. (1981). Open queueing network models of dynamic job shops. International Journal of Production Research, 19, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations