Skip to main content

The International Vocabulary of Metrology and the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: Analysis, Criticism, and Recommendations

  • Chapter
Evaluating Measurement Accuracy

Abstract

As an independent scientific discipline, metrology needs its own terminological dictionary. Beginning from 1984, ISO has published three editions of the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM). The first such dictionary – “International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology” appeared in 1984. In 1993 came out the second edition of this document, and in 2007 the third (and current) edition. All three editions were prepared under the auspices of BIPM. The third edition has a new name – “International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM)” [1] – in order to stress the fundamental differences from the prior editions. The new VIM indeed differs significantly from the previous ones. Instead of the traditional philosophical foundations of metrology the new VIM adopts the philosophy of the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)” – the document prepared under the auspices of BIPM and published by ISO in 1995 [2]. This philosophy was named in VIM the “uncertainty approach”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indeed, the reader would note that this terminology, which separates the terms error and uncertainty, is followed in the present book.

  2. 2.

    Recall from Sect. 3.6 that by reliability of an estimate we mean an indication of how much different estimates, obtained from different samples of observations, can differ from each other.

  3. 3.

    Note that while we in this book have also transitioned from traditional theory of measurements to what we call physical theory, our change retains the concepts of true value of a measurand or measurement error, and does not substitute standard deviation for measurement accuracy indicator. Our physical theory avoids the use of Taylor series and thus increased accuracy of estimating measurement uncertainty, as well as solves two fundamental problems in theory of measurement: constructing confidence intervals for indirect measurements and universal method for combining systematic and random components of measurement error. The uncertainty approach introduced by VIM and GUM does not solve new problems, and – as we show in this chapter – produced some incorrect methods.

References

  1. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), ISO/IEC Guide 99 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISO (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Measurement Uncertainty, American National Standard ANSI/ASME РТС 19.1-1985 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Process Instrumentation Terminology, American National Standard ANSI/ISA-51.1-1979 (R 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Metrology. Basic Terms and Definitions. Recommendation 29–99 [In Russian]. Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology, and Certification. (Izdatel’stvo Standartov, Minsk, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method. ISO/IEC Guide 98–3:2008/Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”, ISO (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.B. Abernethy et al., Measurement Uncertainty Handbook (Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Bich, M.G. Cox, P.M. Harris, Evolution of the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”. Metrologia 43, 161–166 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. I.E. Burns, P.J. Campion, A. Williams, Error and uncertainty. Metrologia 9, 101–104 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Kaarls, Metrology, essential to trade, industry and society. Accred. Qual. Assur. 12(8), 435–437 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Kacker, A. Jones, On use of Bayesian statistics to make the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” consistent. Metrologia 40, 235–248 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Rabinovich, Towards a new edition of the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”. Accred. Qual. Assur. 12(11), 603–608 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Rabinovich, Measurement Errors and Uncertainties: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. (Springer, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.G. Rabinovich, Measurement Errors [in Russian] (Energia, Leningrad, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.G. Rabinovich, Method for calculating the measurement errors. Metrologia (Supplement to Izmeritel’naya Technika) 1, 3–12 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

9.1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

GuideToAssessingMeasurementAccuracy_1 (docx 338 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rabinovich, S.G. (2013). The International Vocabulary of Metrology and the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: Analysis, Criticism, and Recommendations. In: Evaluating Measurement Accuracy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6717-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics