Skip to main content

Multivariable Evaluation of Candidates for Cardiovascular Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essential Cardiology

Abstract

A preventive approach to the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is needed. It is the leading cause of death in the USA and across most of the world. Those fortunate enough to survive can seldom be restored to full function. Extensive epidemiologic research and clinical trials have identified modifiable predisposing risk factors which, when corrected, can reduce the likelihood of its occurrence. Because CVD is a multifactorial disease with the risk factors interacting multiplicatively over time to promote it, these risk factors need to be assessed jointly. To accomplish this, multivariate risk prediction functions (algorithms) which estimate the probability of cardiovascular events conditional on the burden of specified risk factors have been produced to facilitate evaluation of candidates for CVD in need of preventive management.

Over six decades, the Framingham Study and other epidemiological studies have identified modifiable CVD risk factors that have a strong dose-dependent and independent relationship to the rate of development of atherosclerotic CVD. They include classes of risk factors such as atherogenic personal traits, lifestyles that promote them, and innate susceptibility. Most of the relevant risk factors are easy to assess during an office visit and include systolic blood pressure, blood lipids (total and HDL cholesterol) diabetes status, and current smoking. These risk factors in addition to age and sex are the standard CVD risk factors that are basic components in most risk prediction functions.

We summarize the data that established the standard risk factors. We then present the justification and need for multivariate evaluation and prediction functions along with some history. We illustrate the above using examples of existing functions. Then we discuss the evaluation of the performance of the functions and the validity and transportability of existing functions. We end with the discussion of adding new variables (novel biomarkers) to risk prediction.

†deceased

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zachariah J, Vasan RA, D’Agostino RB. The burden of increasing worldwide cardiovascular disease. In: Fuster V, Walsh R, Harrington R, editors. Hurst’s the heart. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cupples LA, D’Agostino RB. Section 34: some risks factors related to the annual incidence of cardiovascular disease and death in pooled repeated biennial measurements. In: Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Garrison RJ, editors. Framingham Heart Study: 30 year follow-up. Bethesda: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manson JE, Tosteson H, Ridker PM, et al. The primary prevention of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1406–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kannel WB. Contribution of the Framingham Study to preventive cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:206–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawber TR, Meadows GF, Moore Jr FE. Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951;41:279–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Agostino Sr RB, Kannel WB. Epidemiological background and design: the Framingham Study. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association sesquicentennial invited paper sessions. 1989. Alexandria VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson R, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Milne RJ, Rogers A. Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and blood cholesterol based on an individual’s absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet. 2005;365:434–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Odell PM, et al. An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991;83:357–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, et al. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:312–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murabito JM, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Wilson PWF. Intermittent claudication: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. Circulation. 1997;96:44–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Slibershatz H, Kannel WB, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannel WB, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, et al. Profile for estimating risk of heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1197–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino Sr RB. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23:1631–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Agostino Sr RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Agostino RB, Russell MW, Huse DM, et al. Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: new results from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 2000;139:272–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Califf RM, Armstrong PW, Carver JR, D’Agostino RB, et al. Task Force 5. Stratification of patients into high, medium, and low risk subgroups for purposes of risk factor management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:964–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson R. Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice: absolute risk rules – but raises the question of population screening. BMJ. 2000;320:659–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rose G. Environmental health: problems and prospects. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1991;25:48–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vine DL, Hastings GE. Ischaemic heart disease and cholesterol: absolute risk more informative than relative risk. BMJ. 1994;308:1040–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lloyd-Jones DM. Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status and future directions. Circulation. 2010;121:1768–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kannel WB, Sytkowski PA. Atherosclerosis risk factors. Pharmacol Ther. 1987;32:207–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A, et al. Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease – six year follow up experience: the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1961;55:33–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kannel WB, Wilson PWF. Comparison of risk profiles for cardiovascular events: implications for prevention. In: Abboud FM, editor. Advances in internal medicine. Chicago: Mosby Yearbook; 1997. p. 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. Diabetes Care. 1979;2:120–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kannel WB, Wilson PWF. Risk factors that attenuate the female coronary disease advantage. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:57–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. NIH Consensus Development Panel. Triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein and coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1993;269:505–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kannel WB. High-density lipoproteins: epidemiologic profile and risks of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52:9B–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson PWF, Kannel WB. Hypercholesterolemia and coronary risk in the elderly: the Framingham Study. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 1993;2:52–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Corti MC, Guralnic JM, Salive ME, et al. HDL cholesterol predicts coronary heart disease mortality in older persons. JAMA. 1995;274:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kannel WB, Wilson PWF. Efficacy of lipid profiles in prediction of coronary disease. Am Heart J. 1992;124:768–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kannel WB. Elevated systolic blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:251–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kannel WB, Dawber TR, McGee DL, et al. Perspectives on systolic blood hypertension: the Framingham Study. Circulation. 1980;61:1179–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Franklin SS, Kahn SA, Wong ND, et al. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1999;100:354–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988: role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. JAMA. 2002;287:356–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Castelli WP, Wilson PWF, Levy D, Anderson K. Cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:12H–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kannel WB. Epidemiologic relationship of disease among the different vascular territories. In: Fuster V, Ross R, Topol EJ, editors. Atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease, vol. II. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 1591–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cupples LA, Gagnon DR, Wong ND, et al. Preexisting cardiovascular conditions and long-term prognosis after initial myocardial infarction. The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1993;125:863–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kannel WB. Epidemiologic contributions to preventive cardiology and challenges for the 21st century. In: Wong ND, Black HR, Gardin JM, editors. Practical strategies in preventing heart disease. New York: McGraw Hill; 2000. p. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D’Agostino RB, Grundy S, Sullivan L, Wilson P. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic group investigation. JAMA. 2001;286:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. D’Agostino RB, Wolf PA, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Stroke risk profile: adjustment for antihypertensive medication. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1994;25:40–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gundy SM. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integrating risk assessment with intervention. Circulation. 1999;100:988–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, DeBacker G, et al. Estimation of ten year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:987–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Assmann G, Cullen P, Schulte H. Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Circulation. 2002;105:310–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ho KL, Anderson KM, Grossman W, Levy D. Survival after onset of congestive heart failure in the Framingham Study. Circulation. 1993;88:107–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kannel WB, Belanger AJ. Epidemiology of heart failure. Am Heart J. 1994;121:951–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. D’Agostino RB, Nam B-H. Evaluation of the performance of survival analysis model: discrimination and calibration measures. In: Balakrishnan N, Rao CR, editors. Handbook of statistics, vol. 23. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. p. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Risk score profiles. Framingham Heart Website. http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/risk/index.html. Last Accessed 9 Aug 2012.

  51. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis; model specific population value and confidence interval estimations. Stat Med. 2004;23:109023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino Sr RB, D’Agostino Jr RB, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27:207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Marragut J, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, et al. An adaptation of the Framingham coronary heart disease risk function to European Mediterranean areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:634–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu J, Hong Y, D’Agostino Sr RB, et al. Predictive value for the Chinese population of the Framingham CHD risk assessment tool compared with the Chinese Multi-Provincial Cohort Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2591–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Khalili D, Hadaegh F, Soori H, et al. Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Brindle P, Beswick A, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Heart. 2006;92:1752–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Koenig W. Haemostatic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(Suppl C):C39–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Inflammation, aspirin and the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:973–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Welch GN, Loscalzo J. Homocysteine and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1042–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1557–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rutter M, Meigs JB, Sullivan LM, D’Agostino Sr RB, Wilson PWF. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and prediction of cardiovascular events in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2004;110:380–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wilson PWF, Nam B-H, Pencina M, D’Agostino Sr RB, Benjamin EJ, O’Donnell CJ. C-reactive protein and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women from the Framingham Heart Study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2473–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1336–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lloyd-Jones DM, Nam B-H, D’Agostino Sr RB, Levy D, Murabito JM, Wang TJ, et al. Parental cardiovascular disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults: a prospective study of parents and offspring. JAMA. 2004;291:2204–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Ballantyne CM, Coresh J, Heiss J, Wu KK, et al. An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using c-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1368–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wong TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Chen C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2631–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Polak JF, Pencina MJ, Pencina KM, O’Donnell CJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino Sr RB. Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):213–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • D’Agostino Sr RB, Kannel WB. Epidemiological background and design: the Framingham Study. In: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association sesquicentennial invited paper sessions. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino RB, Grundy S, Sullivan L, Wilson P. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic group investigation. JAMA. 2001;286:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino Sr RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Ballantyne CM, Coresh J, Heiss J, Wu KK, et al. An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using c-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1368–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis; model specific population value and confidence interval estimations. Stat Med. 2004;23:109023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pencina MJ, D’Agostino Sr RB, D’Agostino Jr RB, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27:207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Slibershatz H, Kannel WB, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Chen C, et al. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2631–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariah J, Vasan RA, D’Agostino RB. The burden of increasing worldwide cardiovascular disease. In: Fuster V, Walsh R, Harrington R, editors. Hurst’s the heart. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph B. D’Agostino Sr. FAHA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Agostino, R.B., Kannel, W.B. (2013). Multivariable Evaluation of Candidates for Cardiovascular Disease. In: Rosendorff, C. (eds) Essential Cardiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6705-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6705-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6704-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6705-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics