Skip to main content

Cotton: Traditional and Modern Uses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

Abstract

Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., is one of the most important crops for humanity. It is placed among the top ten most widely grown crops in the world even though its main purpose is not food. In addition to the appreciation for its fibers, cultures learned to use the whole plant for many uses, from controlling reproduction and pharmaceuticals to pigments and cattle feed.

Wild populations of this species, that inhabit coastal dunes and lowlands, are heavily impacted by multiple factors that limit their proper conservation, such as land use changes caused by the development of resorts, roads, residential areas, and the general disturbance of coastal areas. On the other hand, biosecurity measures currently taken have proved inefficient in the face of gene and transgene flow with cultivated relatives of the same species.

In 2002, we began to study the populations of wild cotton to propose strategies that could contribute to in situ conservation of the species in Mexico, its center of origin and diversity. Since then, we have made multiple visits to each of the cotton metapopulations and talked to the people living in the same communities. We also investigated the genetic diversity, interactions between plants and insects, bacteria and fungi while documenting uses and traditions preserved by the people, which became valuable contributions that motivated us to write this chapter. We noted that the problems caused by migration, poverty, and loss of consciousness by the younger generations transcend from cotton conservation to society as a whole. These situations pointed out that long-term conservation of plant genetic resources of Mesoamerica will only be possible through the preservation of ancient knowledge about the care of crop fields (such as milpa), traditional and medicinal uses of plants, indigenous languages, gastronomy and general habits and customs that shaped the great biodiversity of Mesoamerica to domesticate over 150 crops that are important to humanity today.

Thus, one way to create conservation strategies for these plants is to make information available to all public about their past, present, and potential uses in order to promote care for the plants and their environment at local and global levels. In this chapter, we will discuss traditional and current uses of G. hirsutum, especially in Mesoamerica, because this region is its center of domestication and therefore, where the longest relationship with human civilizations has been established. Here, we show that instead of taking advantage from their great potential for generating long-term biosafety conditions and improving conservation strategies for this species at its center of origin and diversity, our society is wasting opportunities of the multiple uses cotton could provide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fryxell PA. The natural history of the cotton tribe (Malvaceae, tribe Gossypieae). CollegeStation: Texas A&M University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wendel JF, Brubaker CL, Seelanan T. The origin and evolution of Gossypium. In: Stewart JM et al., editors. Physiology of cotton. The Netherlands: Springer; 2010. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FAOSTAT. Searchable online statistical database from Food and Agriculture Division of the United Nations. 2012. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed April 2014.

  4. James C. Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAAA briefs no. 44. Ithaca: ISAAA; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seelanan T, Schnabel A, Wendel JF. Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Syst Bot. 1997;22(2):259–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watt G. The wild and cultivated cotton plants of the world. A revision of the genus Gossypium, framed primarily with the object of aiding planters and investi. Charleston: Nabu Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchinson JB, Silow RA, Stephens SG. The evolution of Gossypium and the differentiation of the cultivated cottons. New York: Oxford University Press; 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fryxell PA. Stages in the evolution of Gossypium L. Adv Front Pl Sci. 1965;10:31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khadi BM, Santhy V, Yadav MS. Cotton: an introduction. In: Zehr UB, editor. Cotton biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson JB. New evidence on the origin of the old world cottons. Heredity. 1954;8(2):225–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wendel JF, Albert VA. Phylogenetics of the cotton genus (Gossypium): character-state weighted parsimony analysis of chloroplast-DNA restriction site data and its systematic and biogeographic implications. Syst Bot. 1992;17(1):115–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown MS, Menzel MY. The cytology and crossing behavior of Gossypium gossypioides. Bull Torrey Botanical Club. 1952;79:110–25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerstel DU. Chromosomal translocations in interspecific hybrids of the genus Gossypium. Evolution. 1953;7(3):234–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Menzel MY, Brown MS. The significance of multivalent formation in three-species Gossypium hybrids. Genetics. 1954;39(4):546–57.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wendel JF, Schnabel A, Seelanan T. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(1):280–4.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cronn RC, Small RL, Haselkorn T, Wendel JF. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. Am J Bot. 2002;89(4):707–25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Endrizzi JE, Turcotte EL, Kohel RJ. Genetics, cytology and evolution of Gossypium. Adv Genet. 1985;23:271–375.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wendel JF, Rowley R, Stewart JM. Genetic diversity in and phylogenetic relationships of the Brazilian endemic cotton, Gossypium mustelinum (Malvaceae). Pl Syst Evol. 1994;192(1–2):49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pickersgill B. Domestication of plants in the Americas: insights from Mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):925–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wegier AL. Diversidad genética y conservación de Gossypium hirsutum silvestre y cultivado en México [PhD thesis]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berdan FF. Cotton in Aztec Mexico: production, distribution and uses. Mexican Studies. 1987;3(2):235–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chase AF, Chase DZ, Zorn E, Teeter W. Textiles and the maya archaeological record. Anc Meso. 2008;19(1):127–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Follensbee BJA. Fiber technology and weaving in formative-period gulf coast cultures. Anc Meso. 2008;19(1):87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith ME, Hirth KG. The development of prehispanic cotton-spinning technology in western Morelos, Mexico. J Field Archaeol. 1988;15(3):349–58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilar A. La tradición ante el mundo actual. Remigio Mestas: tradición y sustentabilidad (II de III partes). El Jolgorio cultural, Oaxaca. México; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. López F. Museos textiles en Canadá, Guatemala y México. Res Mobilis. 2012;1(1):108–23.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bibilioteca de digital de la Medicina Tradicional Mexicana (BDMTM). Accessed April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berardi LC, Goldblatt LA. Gossypol. In: Liener IE, editor. Toxic constituents of plant foodstuffs. New York: Academic Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abou-donia MB. Physiological effects and metabolism of gossypol. Residue Rev. 1976;61:125–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dodou K. Investigations on gossypol: past and present developments. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 2005;14(11):1419–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Celorio-Mancera ML, Ahn SJ, Vogel H, Heckel DG. Transcriptional responses underlying the hormetic and detrimental effects of the plant secondary metabolite gossypol on the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa armigera. BMC Genom. 2011;12(1):575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Randel RD, Chase CC, Wyse SJ. Effects of gossypol and cottonseed products on reproduction of mammals. J Anim Sci. 1992;70:1628–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boatner CH. Pigments of cottonseed. In: Bailey AE, editor. Cottonseed and cottonseed products. New York: Interscience; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kavilanz P. Dollar bills are made of cotton. CNN-Money. http://money.cnn.com/2011/03/08/news/economy/dollar_cotton_prices/. Accessed March 2014.

  35. Campbell T, Bullock S, Long D, Hewitt D, Dowd M. Visitation to cottonseed storage sites by feral swine and evidence of gossypol exposure. Human-Wildlife Interact. 2010;4(1):145–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Diaw MT, Dieng A, Mergeai G, Sy M, Hornick JL. Effects of the substitution of groundnut cake by conventional cottonseed kernel on broilers production in Senegal. Tropicultura. 2010;28(3):139–47.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnston NP, Berrio LF. Comparative effects of cottonseed, soybeans, safflower seeds and flax seeds on the performance of rabbits and guinea pigs. J Appl Rabbit Res. 1985;8(2):64–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Calhoun ML, Kuhlmann SW, Baldwin BC. Cotton feed product composition and gossypol availability and toxicity. 2nd National Alternative Feeds Symposium. Missouri, Columbia: St. Louis, MO. University of Missouri. 1995; p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Brien RD, Jones LA, King CC, Wakelyn PJ, Wan PJ. Cottonseed oil. In: Shahidi F, editor. Bailey’s industrial oil and fat products. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2005. p. 173–279. Chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blasi DA, Drouillard JS. Composition and feeding value of cottonseed feed products for beef cattle. Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wegier A, Piñeyro-Nelson A, Alarcón J, Gávez-Mariscal A, Alvarez-Buylla ER, Piñero D. Recent long-distance transgene flow into wild populations conforms to historical patterns of gene flow in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) at its centre of origin. Mol Ecol. 2011;20(19):4182–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Committee on Environmental Impacts Associated with Commercialization of Transgenic Plants (CEIACTP), Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Research Council. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: The Scope and Adequacy of Regulation. National Academies Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Coutinho EM, Athayde C, Atta G, et al. Gossypol blood levels and inhibition of spermatogenesis in men taking gossypol as a contraceptive. A multicenter, international, dose-finding study. Contraception. 2000;61(1):61–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Polsky B, Segal SJ, Baron PA, Gold JW, Ueno H, Armstrong D. Inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus in vitro by gossypol. Contraception. 1989;39(6):579–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. An T, Ouyang W, Pan W, et al. Amino acid derivatives of the (−) enantiomer of gossypol are effective fusion inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antiviral Res. 2012;94(3):276–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ratsula K, Haukkamaa M, Wichmann K, Luukkainen T. Vaginal contraception with gossypol: a clinical study. Contraception. 1983;27(6):571–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Remigio Mestas, Alejandro de Ávila, Flavio Aragón, Jorge Larson, Alejandro Casas, and Rafael Lira whose words and advice contributed to this chapter. Thanks to historian Ximena Mondragón for valuable comments to the manuscript. We would like to acknowledge all the people whose job, hobby, or traditions contribute to the conservation of cotton and its significance in Mesoamerican culture. This chapter is part of the research conducted in the project “Program for the conservation of wild populations of Gossypium in Mexico,” financed by DGSPRNR-SEMARNAT and CARB-CONABIO to whom we express our gratitude for logistical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Wegier M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wegier, A., Alavez, V., Piñero, D. (2016). Cotton: Traditional and Modern Uses. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics