Skip to main content

Homo sapiensCucurbita interaction in Mesoamerica: Domestication, Dissemination, and Diversification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

Abstract

Cucurbita are monoecious and creeping plants including 20 taxa and 15 species. In Mesoamerica, four species were domesticated or diversified after domestication in other geographic areas: C. argyrosperma C. pepo, C. moschata, and C. ficifolia. The earliest evidences of the domestication of Cucurbita date 9000 BP from Southwestern Mesoamerica and 10,000 BP from Southwestern Ecuador. The main targets of human selection were the seeds contained in larger and less bitter and toxic fruits (due to cucurbitacins), without vine detachment. C. argyrosperma ssp. sororia from México to Central America warm-humid and subhumid climates is considered the wild ancestor of the domesticated C. argyrosperma ssp. argyrosperma. For C. pepo, the proposed ancestor of the domesticated populations of México is C. pepo ssp. fraterna from northeastern Mexico, while the putative progenitor of the cultivars from in North America is C. pepo ssp. texana from eastern United States. For C moschata, there are two hypotheses as to its domestication region: southern Mesoamerica, or from the lowlands of Colombia and southern Ecuador. Cultivated C. ficifolia is found from the Mexican highlands south to Chile and Argentina, its center of domestication is either Central America or southern Mexico/Central America, as supported by linguistic evidence, or the Andes, as indicated by archaeological evidences from Peru dated at 3000 BC. Humans spread cultivated Cucurbita inside and out of Mesoamerica, structuring a complex agricultural system along with corn (Zea mays), and different species of beans (Phaseolus spp.) called “milpa,” that were established in a wide range of environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nee M. The domestication of Cucurbita. Econ Bot. 1990;44:56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tapley WT, Enzie WD, Eseltine GP. The vegetables of New York, Part IV. New York: New York Agricultural Experiment Station; 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitaker TW, Davis GN. Cucurbits: botany, cultivation, and utilization. New York: Interscience; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merrick LC. Systematics and evolution of a domesticated squash, Cucurbita argyosperma, and its wild and weedy relatives. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C, editors. Biology and utilization of the cucurbitaceae. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lira R, Andres T, Nee M. Cucurbita. In: Lira R, editor. Estudios Taxonómicos y Ecogeográficos de las Cucurbitaceae Latinoamericanas de Importancia Económica: Cucurbita, Sechium, Sicana y Cyclanthera. Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Gene Pools. 9. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; 1995. p. 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hurd PD, Linsley EG, Whitaker TW. Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of cultivated Cucurbita. Evolution. 1971;25:218–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffrey C. Appendix: an outline classification of the Cucurbitaceae. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C, editors. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 449–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffrey C. A new system of Cucurbitaceae. [St. Petersburg] Botanicheskii Zhurnal. Moscow & leningrad. 2005;90:332–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schaefer H, Renner SS. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Cucurbitales and a new classification of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae). Taxonomy. 2011;60:122–38.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey LH. Species of Cucurbita. Gentes Herb. 1943;7:267–316.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey LH. Jottings in the Cucurbitas. Gentes Herb. 1948;7:449–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Esquinas Alcazar JT, Gulick PJ. Genetic resources of Cucurbitaceae. A global report. Rome: IBPGR Secretariat; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Origin of agriculture and plant domestication in West Mesoamerica. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;57:813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wandsnider L. The roasted and the boiled: food composition and heat treatment with special emphasis on pit-hearth cooking. J Anthropol Archaeol. 1997;16:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thoms AV. Rock of ages: propagation of hot-rock cookery in Western North America. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36:573–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacNeish RS. Ancient Mesoamerican civilization. Sci New Ser. 1964;143:531–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MacNeish RS, Nelken-Turner A. The preceramic of Mesoamerica. J Field Archaeol. 1983;10:71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flannery KV. Guilá Naquitz. Orlando: Academic; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ranere AJ, Piperno DR, Holst I, Dickau R, Iriarte J. Preceramic human occupation of the Central Balsas Valley, Mexico: cultural context of early domesticated maize and squash. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5014–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Piperno DR, Stothert E. Phytolith for early Holocene Cucurbita domestication in Southwest Ecuador. Science. 2003;299:1054–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Holst I, Iriarte J, Dickau R. Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium BP maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Flores-Silva A, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. The archaic diet in Mesoamerica: incentive for milpa development and species domestication. Econ Bot. 2012;66:328–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hart PJ. Can Cucurbita pepo gourd seeds be made edible? J Archaeol Sci. 2004;31:1631–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown CH, Luedeling E, Wichmann S, Epps P. The paleobiolinguistics of domesticated squash (Cucurbita spp.). In: Quinlan M, Lepofsky D, editors. Explorations in ethnobiology: the legacy of Amadeo Rea, Contributions in ethnobiology, vol. 1. The Society of Ethnobiology: Bristol; 2012. p. 132–61.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Piperno DR. Phytolithic analysis of geological sediments from Panama. Antiquity. 1985;59:13–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piperno DR, Pearsall DM. The origins of agriculture in the lowland neotropics. San Diego: Academic; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dickau R. Microbotanical and macrobotanical evidence of plant use and the transition to agriculture in Panama. In: VanDerwarker AM, Peres TM, editors. Integrating zooarchaeology and paleoethnobotany: a consideration of issues, methods, and cases. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 99–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith BD. Documenting plant domestication: the consilience of biological and archaeological approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1324–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith B. Seed size increase as a marker of domestication in Squash (Cucurbita pepo). In: Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, Bradley D, editors. Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Oakland: University of California Press; 2006. p. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piperno DR, Dillehay TD. Starch grains on human teeth reveal early broad crop diet in northern Peru. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19622–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanjur OI, Piperno DR, Andres TC, Wessel-Beaver L. Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Paris HS, Kabelka E. Gene list for Cucurbita species 2009. Cucurbit genetics cooperative report, 2008–2009. p. 31–2, 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Andres T. Cucurbita fraterna, the closest wild relative and progenitor of C. pepo. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep. 1987;10:69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Decker-Walters DS. Evidence for multiple domestications of Cucurbita pepo. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C, editors. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilson HD, Doebley J, Duvall M. Chloroplast DNA diversity among wild and cultivated members of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae). Theor Appl Genet. 1992;84:859–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paris HS, Yonash N, Portnoy V, Mozes-Daube N, Tzuri G, Katzir N. Assessment of genetic relationships in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) using DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106:971–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gong L, Paris HS, Nee M, Stift G, Pachner M, Vollmann J, Lelley T. Genetic relationships and evolution in Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin, squash, gourd) as revealed by simple sequence repeat polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;124:875–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith BD, Yarnell RA. Initial formation of an indigenous crop complex in eastern North America at 3,800 B.P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:6561–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Provvidenti R. Viral diseases and genetic sources of resistance in Cucurbita species. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C, editors. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 427–35.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Garzon-Tiznado JA. Formación de variedades de calabacita tipo zucchini (Cucurbita spp.) resistentes a los virus mosaico del pepino y de la sandía. Informe de investigación del proyecto: Estudio y Control de las Enfermedades Virales en el Cultivo de la Calabacita. México: INIFAP SARH; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Whitaker TW. American origin of the cultivated cucurbits. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1947;34:102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bukasov SM. Las Plantas Cultivadas de Mexico, Guatemala y Colombia. Turrialba: CATIE-GTZ; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cutler HC, Whitaker TW. A new species of Cucurbita from Ecuador. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1969;55:392–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gong L, Stift G, Kofler R, Pachner M, Lelley T. Microsatellites for the genus Cucurbita and an SSR-based genetic linkage map of Cucurbita pepo L. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:37–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Cerón-González L, Legaria-Solano JP, Villanueva-Verduzco C, Sahagún-Castellanos J. Diversidad genética en cuatro especies mexicanas de calabaza (Cucurbita spp.). Rev Fitotec Mex. 2010;33:189–96.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Barboza N, Albertazzia FJ, Sibaja-Cordero JA, Mora-Umaña F, Astorga C, Ramírez P. Analysis of genetic diversity of Cucurbita moschata (D.) germplasm accessions from Mesoamerica revealed by PCR SSCP and chloroplast sequence data. Sci Hortic. 2012;134:60–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Andres T. Biosystematics, theories on the origin and breeding potential of Cucurbita ficifolia. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C, editors. Biology and utilization of the cucurbitaceae. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990. p. 102–19.

    Google Scholar 

  48. West-Eberhard MJ. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wilson HD, Lira R, Rodriguez I. Crop/weed gene flow: Cucurbita argyrosperma Huber and C. fraterna L.H. Bailey. Econ Bot. 1994;48:293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Montes-Hernández S, Eguiarte L. Genetic structure and indirect estimates of gene flow in three taxa of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) in western Mexico. Am J Bot. 2002;89:1156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Spencer NJ, Snow AA. Fecundity of transgenic wild-crop hybrids of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae): implications for crop-to-wild gene flow. Heredity. 2001;86:694–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cruz-Reyes R, Ávila Sakar G, Sanchez-Montoya G, Quesada M. Experimental assessment of gene flow between transgenic squash and a wild relative in the center of origin of Cucurbits. Ecosphere. 6(12):art248;2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Lira Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lira, R., Eguiarte, L., Montes, S., Zizumbo-Villarreal, D., Marín, P.CG., Quesada, M. (2016). Homo sapiensCucurbita interaction in Mesoamerica: Domestication, Dissemination, and Diversification. In: Lira, R., Casas, A., Blancas, J. (eds) Ethnobotany of Mexico. Ethnobiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6669-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics