Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Barrier Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contraception for Adolescent and Young Adult Women

Abstract

Condoms are the most common contraceptive method used by teenagers and are the only contraceptive method that also protect against sexually transmitted infections. However, the failure rate of condoms as contraception approaches 17 % within this population, making them less reliable as contraception but extremely important in dual use context. In this chapter we discuss basic epidemiology of condom use among teenaged women and examine the contraceptive efficacy of condoms in this population. We explore the role of barrier methods in dual-method protection, discuss unique challenges and considerations young women face when engaging in condom use, and consider provider issues when discussing condom use. We will briefly touch on other barrier methods, specifically the female condom, as a possible alternative to male condoms for teenaged women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Warner L, Steiner MJ. Male condoms. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, et al, editor. Contraceptive technology. New York, NY: Ardent Media; 2008. p. 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trends in sexual risk behaviors among high school students–United States, 1991–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(38):856–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR. 2010;59(RR-4):1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reece M, Herbenick D, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. J Sex Med. 2010;7 Suppl 5:266–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez G, Copen CE, Abma JC. Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006–2010 national survey of family growth. Vital and health statistics series 23, data from the National Survey of Family. Growth. 2011;31:1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williams RL, Fortenberry JD. Update on adolescent condom use. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(5):350–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Sullivan LF, Udell W, Montrose VA, Antoniello P, Hoffman S. A cognitive analysis of college students’ explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(5):1121–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Conard LA, Fortenberry JD, Blythe MJ, Orr DP. Pharmacists’ attitudes toward and practices with adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(4):361–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman S, Mantell J, Exner T, Stein Z. The future of the female condom. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(3):120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Ross J, Hawkins J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2007. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008;57(4):1–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulczycki A, Kim DJ, Duerr A, Jamieson DJ, Macaluso M. The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(3):114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCabe E, Golub S, Lee AC. Making the female condom a “reality” for adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1997;10(3):115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haignere CS, Gold R, Maskovsky J, Ambrosini J, Rogers CL, Gollub E. High-risk adolescents and female condoms: knowledge, attitudes, and use patterns. J Adolesc Health. 2000;26(6):392–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone KM, Grimes DA, Magder LS. Primary prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. A primer for clinicians. JAMA. 1986;255(13):1763–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van de Perre P, Jacobs D, Sprecher-Goldberger S. The latex condom, an efficient barrier against sexual transmission of AIDS-related viruses. AIDS. 1987;1(1):49–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Macaluso M, Lawson ML, Hortin G, Duerr A, Hammond KR, Blackwell R, et al. Efficacy of the female condom as a barrier to semen during intercourse. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(4):289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Speroff L, Darney PD. Barrier methods of contraception. A clinical guide for contraception. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS. Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial. Contraception. 1997;56(1):17–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crosby R, Sanders S, Yarber WL, Graham CA. Condom-use errors and problems: a neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(4):367–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steiner MJ, Dominik R, Rountree RW, Nanda K, Dorflinger LJ. Contraceptive effectiveness of a polyurethane condom and a latex condom: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(3):539–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD003550.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Macaluso M, Blackwell R, Jamieson DJ, Kulczycki A, Chen MP, Akers R, et al. Efficacy of the male latex condom and of the female polyurethane condom as barriers to semen during intercourse: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(1):88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trussell J, Sturgen K, Strickler J, Dominik R. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994;26(2):66–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cates W, Raymond E. Vaginal barriers and spermicides. In: Hatcher RA, Ttussell J, Nelson AL, et al., editors. Contraceptive technology. New York, NY: Ardent Media; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fihn SD, Boyko EJ, Chen CL, Normand EH, Yarbro P, Scholes D. Use of spermicide-coated condoms and other risk factors for urinary tract infection caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(3):281–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fihn SD, Boyko EJ, Normand EH, Chen CL, Grafton JR, Hunt M, et al. Association between use of spermicide-coated condoms and Escherichia coli urinary tract infection in young women. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(5):512–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Handley MA, Reingold AL, Shiboski S, Padian NS. Incidence of acute urinary tract infection in young women and use of male condoms with and without nonoxynol-9 spermicides. Epidemiology. 2002;13(4):431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fortenberry JD, Schick V, Herbenick D, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Reece M. Sexual behaviors and condom use at last vaginal intercourse: a national sample of adolescents ages 14 to 17 years. J Sex Med. 2010;7 Suppl 5:305–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamann CP, Kick SA. Update: immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex. Cutis. 1993;52(5):307–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen FC, Buscher U, Niggemann B. Condoms are not a risk factor for sensitization to latex. Contraception. 2002;66(6):439–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Henry-Reid LM, O’Connor KG, Klein JD, Cooper E, Flynn P, Futterman DC. Current pediatrician practices in identifying high-risk behaviors of adolescents. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e741–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez G, Abma J, Copen C. Educating teenagers about sex in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;44:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jones RK, Purcell A, Singh S, Finer LB. Adolescents’ reports of parental knowledge of adolescents’ use of sexual health services and their reactions to mandated parental notification for prescription contraception. JAMA. 2005;293(3):340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(6):454–61.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Warner L, Stone KM, Macaluso M, Buehler JW, Austin HD. Condom use and risk of gonorrhea and Chlamydia: a systematic review of design and measurement factors assessed in epidemiologic studies. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(1):36–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Winer RL, Hughes JP, Feng Q, O’Reilly S, Kiviat NB, Holmes KK, et al. Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(25):2645–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weller S, Davis K. Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD003255.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martin ET, Krantz E, Gottlieb SL, Magaret AS, Langenberg A, Stanberry L, et al. A pooled analysis of the effect of condoms in preventing HSV-2 acquisition. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(13):1233–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stanaway JD, Wald A, Martin ET, Gottlieb SL, Magaret AS. Case-crossover analysis of condom use and herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(5):388–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Solomon HM, Lyszkowski AD. The male polyurethane condom: a review of current knowledge. Contraception. 1996;53(3):141–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vijayakumar G, Mabude Z, Smit J, Beksinska M, Lurie M. A review of female-condom effectiveness: patterns of use and impact on protected sex acts and STI incidence. Int J STD AIDS. 2006;17(10):652–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pazol K, Kramer MR, Hogue CJ. Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(2):208–17.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ott MA, Adler NE, Millstein SG, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. The trade-off between hormonal contraceptives and condoms among adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;34(1):6–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roye CF. Condom use by Hispanic and African-American adolescent girls who use hormonal contraception. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23(4):205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Santelli JS, Warren CW, Lowry R, Sogolow E, Collins J, Kann L, et al. The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1997;29(6):261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson JE, Santelli J, Gilbert BC. Adolescent dual use of condoms and hormonal contraception: trends and correlates 1991–2001. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(9):719–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brown JL, Hennessy M, Sales JM, DiClemente RJ, Salazar LF, Vanable PA, et al. Multiple method contraception use among African American adolescents in four US cities. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:765917.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Manning WD, Longmore MA, Giordano PC. The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000;32(3):104–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Sionean C, Cobb BK, Harrington K, et al. Correlates of using dual methods for sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy prevention among high-risk African-American female teens. J Adolesc Health. 2001;28(5):410–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Riehman KS, Sly DF, Soler H, Eberstein IW, Quadagno D, Harrison DF. Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(5):212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cook L, Nanda K, Grimes D. Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD002031.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD003551.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kuyoh MA, Toroitich-Ruto C, Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Gallo MF. Sponge versus diaphragm for contraception: a Cochrane review. Contraception. 2003;67(1):15–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Grimes DA, Lopez L, Raymond EG, Halpern V, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Spermicide used alone for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD005218.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kiley J, Sobrero A. Use and effectiveness of barrier and spermicidal contraceptive methods. The Global Library of Women’s Medicine (ISSN: 1756–2228) 2008. doi:10.3843/GLOWM.10385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 2050, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Elisabeth Woodhams M.D. & Melissa Gilliam M.D., M.P.H.

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Woodhams M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melissa Gilliam M.D., M.P.H.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Woodhams M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Amy Whitaker

  2. Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Melissa Gilliam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodhams, E., Gilliam, M. (2014). Barrier Methods. In: Whitaker, A., Gilliam, M. (eds) Contraception for Adolescent and Young Adult Women. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6579-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6579-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6578-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6579-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation