Skip to main content

Fatigue Dynamics Under Statistically and Spectrally Similar Deterministic and Stochastic Excitations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1

Part of the book series: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series ((CPSEMS,volume 35))

Abstract

Estimating and tracking crack growth dynamics is essential for fatigue failure prediction. A new experimental system—coupling structural and crack growth dynamics—is used to show fatigue damage accumulation is different under chaotic and stochastic loading, even when both excitations possess same spectral and statistical signatures. Furthermore, the conventional rain-flow counting method considerably overestimates damage in case of chaotic forcing. Important nonlinear loading characteristics, which can explain the observed discrepancies, are identified and suggested to be included as loading parameters in new fatigue models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(R =\sigma _{\min }/\sigma _{\max }\), where σ min is the minimum peak stress and σ max is the maximum peak stress

References

  1. ASTM E1820-08a (2008) Standard test methods for measurement of fracture toughness. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chee-Hoe Foong, Wiercigroch M, Deans WF (2006) Novel dynamic fatigue-testing device: design and measurements. Meas Sci Technol 17:2218–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Downing SD, Socie DF (1982) Simple rainflow counting algorithms. Int J Fatigue 4(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falco M, Liu M, Chelidze D (2010) A new fatigue testing apparatus model and parameter identification. In: ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Montreal, vol 5(44137), pp 1007–1012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fraser AM, Swinney HL (1986) Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys Rev A 33:1134–1140

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakšić N, Chee-Hoe Foong, Wiercigroch M, Boltežar M (2008) Parameter identification and modelling of the fatigue-testing rig. Int J Mech Sci 50(7):1142–1152

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kantz H, Schreiber S (2004) Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI (1992) Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 45:3403–3411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miner M (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J Appl Mech 67:A159–A164

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) A practical method for calculating largest lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys D 65:117–134

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiber T, Schmitz A (1996) Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Phys Rev Lett 77:635–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skorupa M (1999) Load interaction effects during fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading – a literature review. part i: Empirical trends. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 21:987–1006

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skorupa M (1999) Load interaction effects during fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading – a literature review. part ii: Qualitative interpretations. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 22:905–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Theiler J (1986) Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Phys Rev A 34:2427–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1100031.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Chelidze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, S.H., Falco, M., Liu, M., Chelidze, D. (2013). Fatigue Dynamics Under Statistically and Spectrally Similar Deterministic and Stochastic Excitations. In: Kerschen, G., Adams, D., Carrella, A. (eds) Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol 35. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6570-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6570-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6569-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6570-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics