Skip to main content

Locally Non-linear Model Calibration Using Multi Harmonic Responses: Applied on Ecole de Lyon Non-linear Benchmark Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1

Abstract

In industry, linear FE-models commonly serve to represent global structural behavior. However, when test data are available they may show evidence of nonlinear dynamic characteristics. In such a case, an initial linear model may be judged being insufficient in representing the dynamics of the structure. The causes of the non-linear characteristics may be local in nature whereas the major part of the structure is satisfactorily represented by linear descriptions. Although the initial model then can serve as a good foundation, the parameters needed to substantially increase the model’s capability of representing the real structure are most likely not included in the initial model. Therefore, a set of candidate parameters controlling nonlinear effects, opposite to what is used within the vast majority of model calibration exercises, have to be added. The selection of the candidates is a delicate task which must be based on engineering insight into the structure at hand.The focus here is on the selection of the model parameters and the data forming the objective function for calibration. An over parameterized model for calibration render in indefinite parameter value estimates. This is coupled to the test data that should be chosen such that the expected estimate variancesof the chosen parameters are made small. Since the amount of information depends on the raw data available and the usage of them, one possibility to increase the estimate precision is to process the test data differently before calibration. A tempting solution may be to simply add more test data but, as shown in this paper, the opposite could be an alternative; disregarding low excessive data may make the remaining data better to discriminate between different parameter settings.Since pure mono-harmonic excitation during test is an abnormality, the excitation force is here designed to contain sub and super harmonics besides the fundamental one. Further, the steady-state responses at the side frequencies are here shown to contain most valuable information for the calibration process of models of locally nonlinear structures.Here, synthetic test data stemming from a model representing the Ecole Centrale de Lyon (ECL) nonlinear benchmark are used for illustration. The nonlinear steady state solutions are found using iterative linear reverse path state space calculations. The model calibration is here based on nonlinear programming utilizing several parametric starting points. Candidates for starting points are found by the Latin Hypercube sampling method. The best candidates are selected as starting points for optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Linderholt A (2003) Test design for finite element model updating, identifiable parameters and informative test data, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Udwadia FE (1997) A finite element model updating formulation using frequency responses and eigenfrequencies. In: NAFEMS international conference on structural dynamics modelling, pp. 293–305

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thouverez F (2003) Presentation of the ECL benchmark. Mech Syst Signal Process, Elsevier 17(1):195–202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayfeh AH, Mook DT (1979) Nonlinear oscillations. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Walter E, Pronzato L (1997) Identification of parametric models from experimental data. Springer, Great Britain

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Spall C (1999) The information matrix in control, computation and some applications. In: 38th conference on decision and control, Arizona, pp. 2367–2372

    Google Scholar 

  7. Linderholt A, Abrahamsson T (2003) Parameter identifiability in finite element model error localization. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(3):579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller AJ (1990) Subset selection in regression. Chapman and Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. MSC Nastran version 2012, MSC Software

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nash SG, Sofer A (1996) Linear and nonlinear programming. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Swedish National Aviation Engineering Program (NFFP) for their kind support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Linderholt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yaghoubi, V., Chen, Y., Linderholt, A., Abrahamsson, T. (2013). Locally Non-linear Model Calibration Using Multi Harmonic Responses: Applied on Ecole de Lyon Non-linear Benchmark Structure. In: Kerschen, G., Adams, D., Carrella, A. (eds) Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol 35. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6570-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6570-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6569-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6570-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics