Skip to main content

Robust Model Calibration with Load Uncertainties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 5

Abstract

The goal of this work is to propose a model calibration strategy for an industrial problem consisting in a MW class geared wind turbine power train subjected to uncertain loads. Lack of knowledge is commonplace in this kind of engineering system and a realistic model calibration cannot be performed without taking into account this type of uncertainty. The question at stake in this study is how to perform a robust predictive model of a dynamic system given that the excitations are poorly known. The uncertainty in the latter will be represented with an info-gap model. The tradeoff between fidelity to data and robustness to uncertainty is then investigated in order to maximize the robustness of the prediction error at a given horizon of uncertainty. This methodology is illustrated on a simple academic model and on a more complex engineering system representing a wind turbine geared power train.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ASME (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York. Tech. Rep. 10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baruch M, Itzhack YB (1978) Optimal weighted orthogonalization of measured modes. AIAA J 16:346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman A, Nagy E (1983) Improvement of a large analytical model using test data. AIAA J 21:1168–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Halevi Y, Bucher I (2003) Model updating via weighted reference basis with connectivity constraints. J Sound Vib 265:561–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friswell M, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics (Vol. 38). Springer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerschen G, Worden K, Vakakis A, Golinval J (2006) Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:505–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mottershead J, Link M, Friswell M (2011) The sensitivty method in finite element model updating: a tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2275–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calvi A, Schueller G, Goller B, Broggi M (2011) A stochastic model updating technique for complex aerospace structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(7):739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Link M, Govers Y (2010) Stochastic model updating-covariance matrix adjustment from uncertain experimental modal data. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(3):696–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-Haim Y, Hemez F (2011) Robustness, fidelity and predictions looseness of models. Phys Trans R Soc A 468:227–244

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. IEC 61400-1 (2005) 3rd edn 2005-08 Wind turbines – Part 1: Design requirements, IEC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Haim Y (2006) Info-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty, 2nd edn. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig RR (1981) Structural dynamics: an introduction to computer methods (Vol. 40). New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin J, Parker RG (1999) Analytical characterization of the unique properties of planetary gear free vibration. J Vib Acoust 131:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahraman A (1994) Planetary gear train dynamics. J Mech Des 116:713–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papathanassiou SA (2001) Mechanical stresses in fixed-speed wind turbines due to network disturbances. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 16(4):361–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahimi M, Parniani M (2009) Dynamic behavior and transient stability analysis of fixed speed wind turbines. Renew Energy 34(12):2613–2624

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Yakov Ben-Haim for his insightful support in the advancement of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Pereiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pereiro, D., Cogan, S., Sadoulet-Reboul, E., Martinez, F. (2013). Robust Model Calibration with Load Uncertainties. In: Simmermacher, T., Cogan, S., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C. (eds) Topics in Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 5. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6564-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6564-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6563-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6564-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics